我们是否给有高碳酸血症风险的病人提供了过多的氧气?来自一家大型教学医院的真实数据。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107965
B Ronan O'Driscoll, Nawar Diar Bakerly
{"title":"我们是否给有高碳酸血症风险的病人提供了过多的氧气?来自一家大型教学医院的真实数据。","authors":"B Ronan O'Driscoll,&nbsp;Nawar Diar Bakerly","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Oxygen guidelines recommend a target saturation range (SpO<sub>2</sub> range) of 88–92 % for patients at risk of hypercapnia. Saturations &lt;88 % and saturations &gt;92 % whilst using supplemental oxygen are associated with increased mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We audited SpO<sub>2</sub> observations of all patients with a prescribed target range of 88–92 % at one hospital over a four-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,045,958 observations from patients with an oxygen prescription, 107,724 (10.3 %) had a target range of 88–92 % (at risk of hypercapnia). 26,668 of these observations (24.8 %) involved oxygen use. 89.6 % of the SpO<sub>2</sub> observations with target SpO<sub>2</sub> range 88–92 % were satisfactory with SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥88 % breathing air or SpO<sub>2</sub> 88–92 % breathing oxygen. However, 1.2 % of SpO<sub>2</sub> observations for these patients were too low (&lt;88 %). This was commoner in observations involving use of supplemental oxygen (2.2 %) compared with observations on air (0.9 %).</div><div>Of the SpO<sub>2</sub> observations with target SpO<sub>2</sub> range 88–92 % which were recorded whilst the patient was receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, 9870 had SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt;92 % (over-oxygenated). This represented 9.2 % of all observations for patients with a target range of 88–92 % and 37.0 % of the 26,668 observations involving use of oxygen for these patients. Compared with nasal cannulae, SpO<sub>2</sub> observations involving use of simple masks, Venturi masks and humidified oxygen were more commonly outside of the target range.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>We found that excessive oxygen administration was much commoner than insufficient oxygen therapy for hospital patients at risk of hypercapnia. Excessive oxygen use implies an increased risk of harm to these patients, increased cost, and potentially delayed discharges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 107965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are we giving too much oxygen to patients at risk of hypercapnia? Real world data from a large teaching hospital\",\"authors\":\"B Ronan O'Driscoll,&nbsp;Nawar Diar Bakerly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Oxygen guidelines recommend a target saturation range (SpO<sub>2</sub> range) of 88–92 % for patients at risk of hypercapnia. Saturations &lt;88 % and saturations &gt;92 % whilst using supplemental oxygen are associated with increased mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We audited SpO<sub>2</sub> observations of all patients with a prescribed target range of 88–92 % at one hospital over a four-year period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1,045,958 observations from patients with an oxygen prescription, 107,724 (10.3 %) had a target range of 88–92 % (at risk of hypercapnia). 26,668 of these observations (24.8 %) involved oxygen use. 89.6 % of the SpO<sub>2</sub> observations with target SpO<sub>2</sub> range 88–92 % were satisfactory with SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥88 % breathing air or SpO<sub>2</sub> 88–92 % breathing oxygen. However, 1.2 % of SpO<sub>2</sub> observations for these patients were too low (&lt;88 %). This was commoner in observations involving use of supplemental oxygen (2.2 %) compared with observations on air (0.9 %).</div><div>Of the SpO<sub>2</sub> observations with target SpO<sub>2</sub> range 88–92 % which were recorded whilst the patient was receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, 9870 had SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt;92 % (over-oxygenated). This represented 9.2 % of all observations for patients with a target range of 88–92 % and 37.0 % of the 26,668 observations involving use of oxygen for these patients. Compared with nasal cannulae, SpO<sub>2</sub> observations involving use of simple masks, Venturi masks and humidified oxygen were more commonly outside of the target range.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>We found that excessive oxygen administration was much commoner than insufficient oxygen therapy for hospital patients at risk of hypercapnia. Excessive oxygen use implies an increased risk of harm to these patients, increased cost, and potentially delayed discharges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000277\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:对于有高碳酸血症风险的患者,氧指南推荐的目标饱和度范围(SpO2范围)为88-92%。在使用补充氧时饱和度达到92%与死亡率增加有关。方法:我们对一家医院所有患者SpO2的观察结果进行审计,规定目标范围为88-92%,为期四年。结果:在1045958例氧气处方患者的观察中,107724例(10.3%)的目标范围为88-92%(高碳酸血症风险)。其中26668例(24.8%)与氧气使用有关。呼吸空气时SpO2≥88%或呼吸氧气时SpO2 88 ~ 92%, 89.6%的SpO2观测值在目标SpO2范围88 ~ 92%满意。然而,这些患者中有1.2%的SpO2观察值过低(在患者接受补充氧治疗时记录的目标SpO2范围为88-92%的2个观察值),9,870例SpO2 bb0 -92%(过度氧合)。这占目标范围为88-92%的所有患者观察的9.2%,占26,668例患者使用氧气观察的37.0%。与鼻插管相比,使用简单面罩、文丘里面罩和湿氧的SpO2观测值更常见地超出目标范围。摘要:我们发现,对于有高碳酸血症风险的住院患者,过量给氧比不足给氧更为常见。过量的氧气使用意味着对这些患者的伤害风险增加,费用增加,并可能延迟出院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are we giving too much oxygen to patients at risk of hypercapnia? Real world data from a large teaching hospital

Introduction

Oxygen guidelines recommend a target saturation range (SpO2 range) of 88–92 % for patients at risk of hypercapnia. Saturations <88 % and saturations >92 % whilst using supplemental oxygen are associated with increased mortality.

Methods

We audited SpO2 observations of all patients with a prescribed target range of 88–92 % at one hospital over a four-year period.

Results

Of 1,045,958 observations from patients with an oxygen prescription, 107,724 (10.3 %) had a target range of 88–92 % (at risk of hypercapnia). 26,668 of these observations (24.8 %) involved oxygen use. 89.6 % of the SpO2 observations with target SpO2 range 88–92 % were satisfactory with SpO2 ≥88 % breathing air or SpO2 88–92 % breathing oxygen. However, 1.2 % of SpO2 observations for these patients were too low (<88 %). This was commoner in observations involving use of supplemental oxygen (2.2 %) compared with observations on air (0.9 %).
Of the SpO2 observations with target SpO2 range 88–92 % which were recorded whilst the patient was receiving supplemental oxygen therapy, 9870 had SpO2 >92 % (over-oxygenated). This represented 9.2 % of all observations for patients with a target range of 88–92 % and 37.0 % of the 26,668 observations involving use of oxygen for these patients. Compared with nasal cannulae, SpO2 observations involving use of simple masks, Venturi masks and humidified oxygen were more commonly outside of the target range.

Summary

We found that excessive oxygen administration was much commoner than insufficient oxygen therapy for hospital patients at risk of hypercapnia. Excessive oxygen use implies an increased risk of harm to these patients, increased cost, and potentially delayed discharges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic and prognostic value of LAMB2 in sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor is safe and effectively reduces sino-nasal symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis post lung transplantation Active for life intervention produces a sustained increase in physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Exhaled breath condensate based breath analyser: Real-time thermofluidic standardisation of hydrogen peroxide for longitudinal COPD monitoring: a pilot investigation Subclinical myocardial injury in patients with insomnia symptoms and obstructive sleep apnea: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1