德性一元论与医疗实践:作为跨情境伦理专家的实践智慧。

IF 1.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhae051
Mario De Caro, Federico Bina, Sofia Bonicalzi, Riccardo Brunetti, Michel Croce, Skaistė Kerusauskaite, Claudia Navarini, Elena Ricci, Maria Silvia Vaccarezza
{"title":"德性一元论与医疗实践:作为跨情境伦理专家的实践智慧。","authors":"Mario De Caro, Federico Bina, Sofia Bonicalzi, Riccardo Brunetti, Michel Croce, Skaistė Kerusauskaite, Claudia Navarini, Elena Ricci, Maria Silvia Vaccarezza","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article defends the centrality of practical wisdom in medical practice by building on a monistic view of moral virtue, termed the \"Aretai model,\" according to which possession of practical wisdom is necessary and sufficient for virtuousness, grounding both moral growth and effective moral behavior. From this perspective, we argue that practical wisdom should be conceived as a cross-situational ethical expertise consisting of four skills:moral perception, moral deliberation, emotion regulation, and moral motivation. Conceiving of practical wisdom as both overall virtuousness and ethical expertise makes it possible to deal adequately with the uniqueness of concrete ethically relevant situations. We contend that this becomes particularly evident in the context of medical practice, both in terms of decision-making and action-taking, especially in the most challenging or contentious clinical cases. We conclude the article by suggesting the potential implications of the Aretai model for continuing education in medical and healthcare professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":"80-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtue Monism and Medical Practice: Practical Wisdom as Cross-Situational Ethical Expertise.\",\"authors\":\"Mario De Caro, Federico Bina, Sofia Bonicalzi, Riccardo Brunetti, Michel Croce, Skaistė Kerusauskaite, Claudia Navarini, Elena Ricci, Maria Silvia Vaccarezza\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jmp/jhae051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article defends the centrality of practical wisdom in medical practice by building on a monistic view of moral virtue, termed the \\\"Aretai model,\\\" according to which possession of practical wisdom is necessary and sufficient for virtuousness, grounding both moral growth and effective moral behavior. From this perspective, we argue that practical wisdom should be conceived as a cross-situational ethical expertise consisting of four skills:moral perception, moral deliberation, emotion regulation, and moral motivation. Conceiving of practical wisdom as both overall virtuousness and ethical expertise makes it possible to deal adequately with the uniqueness of concrete ethically relevant situations. We contend that this becomes particularly evident in the context of medical practice, both in terms of decision-making and action-taking, especially in the most challenging or contentious clinical cases. We conclude the article by suggesting the potential implications of the Aretai model for continuing education in medical and healthcare professions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"80-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae051\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae051","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章通过建立一种被称为“Aretai模型”的道德美德一元论观点来捍卫实践智慧在医疗实践中的中心地位,根据这种观点,拥有实践智慧是美德的必要和充分条件,是道德成长和有效道德行为的基础。从这个角度来看,我们认为实践智慧应该被视为一种跨情境的伦理技能,包括四种技能:道德感知、道德审议、情绪调节和道德动机。将实践智慧视为全面的美德和伦理专业知识,可以充分处理具体伦理相关情况的独特性。我们认为,这在医疗实践的背景下变得特别明显,无论是在决策和采取行动方面,特别是在最具挑战性或有争议的临床病例。最后,我们提出了Aretai模式对医疗保健专业继续教育的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtue Monism and Medical Practice: Practical Wisdom as Cross-Situational Ethical Expertise.

This article defends the centrality of practical wisdom in medical practice by building on a monistic view of moral virtue, termed the "Aretai model," according to which possession of practical wisdom is necessary and sufficient for virtuousness, grounding both moral growth and effective moral behavior. From this perspective, we argue that practical wisdom should be conceived as a cross-situational ethical expertise consisting of four skills:moral perception, moral deliberation, emotion regulation, and moral motivation. Conceiving of practical wisdom as both overall virtuousness and ethical expertise makes it possible to deal adequately with the uniqueness of concrete ethically relevant situations. We contend that this becomes particularly evident in the context of medical practice, both in terms of decision-making and action-taking, especially in the most challenging or contentious clinical cases. We conclude the article by suggesting the potential implications of the Aretai model for continuing education in medical and healthcare professions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.
期刊最新文献
Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity. Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance. Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature. Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing. Depressed, Not Disordered: Fittingness and Pathologies of Emotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1