制定外科手术交接课程的教育蓝图:对证据的批判性回顾。

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1
Anastasija Simiceva, Jessica M. Ryan, Walter Eppich, Dara O. Kavanagh, Deborah A. McNamara, Marie Morris
{"title":"制定外科手术交接课程的教育蓝图:对证据的批判性回顾。","authors":"Anastasija Simiceva,&nbsp;Jessica M. Ryan,&nbsp;Walter Eppich,&nbsp;Dara O. Kavanagh,&nbsp;Deborah A. McNamara,&nbsp;Marie Morris","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Background</i> Currently no guidelines exist for the development of surgical handover educational curricula. This critical review synthesises the relevant literature to identify best approaches to handover education and develop an evidence-based framework for teaching and assessing surgical handover skills.<i> Methods</i> The following resources were critically reviewed by two independent researchers to identify key educational components; (1) all published studies primarily utilising an educational intervention to improve surgical handover up to May 2023, (2) key international guidelines and (3) reviews of all handover interventions published within the last 10 years.<i> Results</i> A total of eight comparative studies, two systematic reviews, and four handover guidelines were included. Findings were reported across eight domains; including educational setting, approach, format, content, resources used, assessment, student feedback, and follow-up training. A framework for developing surgical handover curricula was also reported.<i> Conclusion</i> The reported educational framework or ‘blueprint’ aims to assist educators across multiple settings to develop evidence-based surgical handover curricula for undergraduate and postgraduate learners. Future studies need to achieve higher Kirkpatrick levels to demonstrate both effectiveness and sustainability of educational interventions, ensuring safer patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":"30 5","pages":"1693 - 1707"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an educational blueprint for surgical handover curricula: a critical review of the evidence\",\"authors\":\"Anastasija Simiceva,&nbsp;Jessica M. Ryan,&nbsp;Walter Eppich,&nbsp;Dara O. Kavanagh,&nbsp;Deborah A. McNamara,&nbsp;Marie Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><i>Background</i> Currently no guidelines exist for the development of surgical handover educational curricula. This critical review synthesises the relevant literature to identify best approaches to handover education and develop an evidence-based framework for teaching and assessing surgical handover skills.<i> Methods</i> The following resources were critically reviewed by two independent researchers to identify key educational components; (1) all published studies primarily utilising an educational intervention to improve surgical handover up to May 2023, (2) key international guidelines and (3) reviews of all handover interventions published within the last 10 years.<i> Results</i> A total of eight comparative studies, two systematic reviews, and four handover guidelines were included. Findings were reported across eight domains; including educational setting, approach, format, content, resources used, assessment, student feedback, and follow-up training. A framework for developing surgical handover curricula was also reported.<i> Conclusion</i> The reported educational framework or ‘blueprint’ aims to assist educators across multiple settings to develop evidence-based surgical handover curricula for undergraduate and postgraduate learners. Future studies need to achieve higher Kirkpatrick levels to demonstrate both effectiveness and sustainability of educational interventions, ensuring safer patient care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"1693 - 1707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10459-025-10410-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目前尚无指导手术交接教学课程的制定。这篇综述综合了相关文献,以确定交接教育的最佳方法,并为外科交接技能的教学和评估开发一个基于证据的框架。方法:两位独立研究者对以下资源进行了批判性审查,以确定关键的教育成分;(1)截至2023年5月,所有发表的主要利用教育干预来改善手术交接的研究;(2)主要的国际指南;(3)过去10年发表的所有交接干预措施的综述。结果共纳入8篇比较研究、2篇系统综述和4篇交接指南。报告了八个领域的研究结果;包括教育环境、方法、格式、内容、使用的资源、评估、学生反馈和后续培训。本文还报道了外科手术交接课程的编制框架。报告的教育框架或“蓝图”旨在帮助教育工作者在多种环境下为本科生和研究生学习者开发循证手术移交课程。未来的研究需要达到更高的Kirkpatrick水平,以证明教育干预的有效性和可持续性,确保更安全的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing an educational blueprint for surgical handover curricula: a critical review of the evidence

Background Currently no guidelines exist for the development of surgical handover educational curricula. This critical review synthesises the relevant literature to identify best approaches to handover education and develop an evidence-based framework for teaching and assessing surgical handover skills. Methods The following resources were critically reviewed by two independent researchers to identify key educational components; (1) all published studies primarily utilising an educational intervention to improve surgical handover up to May 2023, (2) key international guidelines and (3) reviews of all handover interventions published within the last 10 years. Results A total of eight comparative studies, two systematic reviews, and four handover guidelines were included. Findings were reported across eight domains; including educational setting, approach, format, content, resources used, assessment, student feedback, and follow-up training. A framework for developing surgical handover curricula was also reported. Conclusion The reported educational framework or ‘blueprint’ aims to assist educators across multiple settings to develop evidence-based surgical handover curricula for undergraduate and postgraduate learners. Future studies need to achieve higher Kirkpatrick levels to demonstrate both effectiveness and sustainability of educational interventions, ensuring safer patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
期刊最新文献
Retrieval enhanced learning: Does it matter what topic is to be learned? Direction and specification in a moderated mediation analysis of interprofessional education: a commentary on He et al. Meta-emotion in health professions education: a theoretical integrative review. Pathways into academia - A scoping review with implications for the health professions. Elite interviewing as a research method: a worked example studying academic leadership in health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1