考虑沟槽形态和局部冲刷效应的粘土吸力锚杆抽拔能力及破坏机理

IF 8.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Engineering Geology Pub Date : 2025-03-13 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107942
Min-Hao Zhang , Zhen-Yu Yin , Yong Fu
{"title":"考虑沟槽形态和局部冲刷效应的粘土吸力锚杆抽拔能力及破坏机理","authors":"Min-Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin ,&nbsp;Yong Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seabed trenching is a common geological and geotechnical hazard encountered in offshore engineering, potentially compromising the pull-out capacity of suction anchors and posing risks to mooring systems over time. Currently, to ensure conservative design and facilitate modelling convenience, many relevant studies simplify the trench configurations compared to their in-situ conditions which may lead to inaccurate estimation of trench influence. Moreover, the combined effect of trench and local scour is rarely addressed. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the impact of various trench transversal and longitudinal geometric configurations on undrained pull-out capacity and failure mechanisms of suction anchors in clay considering local scour phenomena. Two distinct downward trends in the pull-out capacity for trench width expansion and trench depth extension are revealed. Comparisons between simplified and realistic trench configurations are conducted and it is recommended to model the realistic trench configurations for accurate estimation of capacity loss. Scenarios involving simultaneous trenches and local scours result in a more significant reduction in pull-out capacity compared to individual trenches. Based on the analyses results, a systematic calculation framework is proposed to estimate the pull-out capacity during trench development. Furthermore, two design considerations are examined with the conclusions that relocating padeye depth towards shallower positions to reduce trench depth cannot achieve higher capacity and selecting suction anchors with larger aspect ratios should be preferred choices considering material cost. These findings can assist in estimating capacity loss and optimizing anchor design when encountering trench-related issues in engineering practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 107942"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pull-out capacity and failure mechanism of suction anchors in clay considering trench configuration and local scour effects\",\"authors\":\"Min-Hao Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin ,&nbsp;Yong Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Seabed trenching is a common geological and geotechnical hazard encountered in offshore engineering, potentially compromising the pull-out capacity of suction anchors and posing risks to mooring systems over time. Currently, to ensure conservative design and facilitate modelling convenience, many relevant studies simplify the trench configurations compared to their in-situ conditions which may lead to inaccurate estimation of trench influence. Moreover, the combined effect of trench and local scour is rarely addressed. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the impact of various trench transversal and longitudinal geometric configurations on undrained pull-out capacity and failure mechanisms of suction anchors in clay considering local scour phenomena. Two distinct downward trends in the pull-out capacity for trench width expansion and trench depth extension are revealed. Comparisons between simplified and realistic trench configurations are conducted and it is recommended to model the realistic trench configurations for accurate estimation of capacity loss. Scenarios involving simultaneous trenches and local scours result in a more significant reduction in pull-out capacity compared to individual trenches. Based on the analyses results, a systematic calculation framework is proposed to estimate the pull-out capacity during trench development. Furthermore, two design considerations are examined with the conclusions that relocating padeye depth towards shallower positions to reduce trench depth cannot achieve higher capacity and selecting suction anchors with larger aspect ratios should be preferred choices considering material cost. These findings can assist in estimating capacity loss and optimizing anchor design when encountering trench-related issues in engineering practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"volume\":\"347 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225000389\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225000389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海底沟是海上工程中常见的地质和岩土灾害,可能会影响吸锚的拔出能力,并随着时间的推移对系泊系统构成风险。目前,为了保证设计的保守性和建模的便捷性,许多相关研究都将沟槽构型与原位条件进行了简化,这可能导致对沟槽影响的估计不准确。此外,沟槽冲刷和局部冲刷的共同作用很少得到解决。因此,本文旨在研究考虑局部冲刷现象的不同沟槽横向和纵向几何构型对粘土中吸力锚不排水抽拔能力的影响及其破坏机制。海沟宽度扩展和海沟深度扩展的拉拔能力有明显的下降趋势。对简化的沟槽构型和实际的沟槽构型进行了比较,建议对实际的沟槽构型进行建模,以准确估计容量损失。与单独的战壕相比,涉及同时战壕和局部冲刷的情况导致撤出能力更大的减少。在分析结果的基础上,提出了一种系统的计算框架,用于估算沟槽开发过程中的拉拔能力。此外,研究了两个设计考虑因素,得出的结论是,将桨叶深度移至较浅的位置以减少沟槽深度并不能获得更高的容量,考虑到材料成本,选择较大宽高比的吸力锚应该是首选。这些发现有助于在工程实践中遇到与沟槽相关的问题时估计能力损失并优化锚杆设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pull-out capacity and failure mechanism of suction anchors in clay considering trench configuration and local scour effects
Seabed trenching is a common geological and geotechnical hazard encountered in offshore engineering, potentially compromising the pull-out capacity of suction anchors and posing risks to mooring systems over time. Currently, to ensure conservative design and facilitate modelling convenience, many relevant studies simplify the trench configurations compared to their in-situ conditions which may lead to inaccurate estimation of trench influence. Moreover, the combined effect of trench and local scour is rarely addressed. Therefore, this paper aims to investigate the impact of various trench transversal and longitudinal geometric configurations on undrained pull-out capacity and failure mechanisms of suction anchors in clay considering local scour phenomena. Two distinct downward trends in the pull-out capacity for trench width expansion and trench depth extension are revealed. Comparisons between simplified and realistic trench configurations are conducted and it is recommended to model the realistic trench configurations for accurate estimation of capacity loss. Scenarios involving simultaneous trenches and local scours result in a more significant reduction in pull-out capacity compared to individual trenches. Based on the analyses results, a systematic calculation framework is proposed to estimate the pull-out capacity during trench development. Furthermore, two design considerations are examined with the conclusions that relocating padeye depth towards shallower positions to reduce trench depth cannot achieve higher capacity and selecting suction anchors with larger aspect ratios should be preferred choices considering material cost. These findings can assist in estimating capacity loss and optimizing anchor design when encountering trench-related issues in engineering practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Mechanical degradation of bedded salt rock induced by ScCO2– brine exposure: Insights from nanoindentation tests Mudline interpretation for superelevation-based velocity estimation: A perspective for practical applications Three-dimensional modelling of unstable rock masses using discrete point clouds Constrained Bayesian inference of geotechnical parameters for response prediction and reliability updating of reservoir slopes On the use of rainfall time series for regional landslide prediction by means of functional regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1