{"title":"一项横断面研究,探讨技术接受模式与药房机器人调剂系统药师职业倦怠和抑郁之间的关系。","authors":"Amna Ibrahim Alshamsi, Mariam AlHarthi, Hessa AbdulQader, Pramod Chhabrani, Safa Ahmed, Muna Almansoori","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1436518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares hospitals using a pharmacy robotic dispensing system (RPDS) with those using manual dispensing systems regarding burnout and depression among pharmacists in Emirates Health Services (EHS) hospitals. Furthermore, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature concerning the relationship between burnout and the technology acceptance model (TAM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine whether burnout and TAM differed between hospitals with RPDS and those with manual dispensing system. The study was carried out in ten hospitals governed by the EHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 respondents completed the survey. Burnout and depression levels among pharmacists working with RPDS did not differ significantly from those using manual dispensing systems. However, the median of personal burnout levels in female pharmacists (Mdn = 50) differed significantly from those using manual dispensing systems (Mdn = 25; U = 3497.5, <i>z</i> = -7.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = -0.49). In contrast, male pharmacists exhibited higher levels of technology acceptance (U = 11,357, <i>z</i> = 5.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001, r = 0.35; U = 10,391, <i>z</i> = 4.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored the differences in burnout, depression levels, and TAM among employees working in public hospitals in the United Arab of Emirates. Overall, automation had both positive and negative effects on workplace stressors experienced by pharmacy staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1436518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-sectional study to explore the relationship between the technology acceptance model and burnout and depression among pharmacists working with a pharmacy robotic dispensing system.\",\"authors\":\"Amna Ibrahim Alshamsi, Mariam AlHarthi, Hessa AbdulQader, Pramod Chhabrani, Safa Ahmed, Muna Almansoori\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1436518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares hospitals using a pharmacy robotic dispensing system (RPDS) with those using manual dispensing systems regarding burnout and depression among pharmacists in Emirates Health Services (EHS) hospitals. Furthermore, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature concerning the relationship between burnout and the technology acceptance model (TAM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine whether burnout and TAM differed between hospitals with RPDS and those with manual dispensing system. The study was carried out in ten hospitals governed by the EHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 256 respondents completed the survey. Burnout and depression levels among pharmacists working with RPDS did not differ significantly from those using manual dispensing systems. However, the median of personal burnout levels in female pharmacists (Mdn = 50) differed significantly from those using manual dispensing systems (Mdn = 25; U = 3497.5, <i>z</i> = -7.8, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = -0.49). In contrast, male pharmacists exhibited higher levels of technology acceptance (U = 11,357, <i>z</i> = 5.58, <i>p</i> < 0.001, r = 0.35; U = 10,391, <i>z</i> = 4.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored the differences in burnout, depression levels, and TAM among employees working in public hospitals in the United Arab of Emirates. Overall, automation had both positive and negative effects on workplace stressors experienced by pharmacy staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1436518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782201/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1436518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1436518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究比较了使用药房机器人配药系统(RPDS)的医院与使用人工配药系统的医院在阿联酋卫生服务(EHS)医院中药剂师的职业倦怠和抑郁。此外,本研究旨在弥补文献中关于职业倦怠与技术接受模型(TAM)之间关系的空白。方法:采用横断面调查的方法,比较采用手工配药系统的医院和采用手工配药系统的医院的工作倦怠和TAM是否存在差异。这项研究是在EHS管理的10家医院进行的。结果:共有256名受访者完成了调查。使用RPDS的药剂师的职业倦怠和抑郁水平与使用手动配药系统的药剂师没有显著差异。然而,女性药剂师的个人倦怠水平中位数(Mdn = 50)与使用人工配药系统的药剂师(Mdn = 25;U = 3497.5,z = -7.8,p r = -0.49)。相比之下,男性药剂师表现出更高水平的技术验收(U = 11357 z = 5.58,p z = 4.0,p r = 0.25)。结论:本研究探讨了阿联酋公立医院员工在职业倦怠、抑郁水平和TAM方面的差异。总体而言,自动化对药房员工的工作压力源有积极和消极的影响。
A cross-sectional study to explore the relationship between the technology acceptance model and burnout and depression among pharmacists working with a pharmacy robotic dispensing system.
Objectives: This study compares hospitals using a pharmacy robotic dispensing system (RPDS) with those using manual dispensing systems regarding burnout and depression among pharmacists in Emirates Health Services (EHS) hospitals. Furthermore, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature concerning the relationship between burnout and the technology acceptance model (TAM).
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine whether burnout and TAM differed between hospitals with RPDS and those with manual dispensing system. The study was carried out in ten hospitals governed by the EHS.
Results: A total of 256 respondents completed the survey. Burnout and depression levels among pharmacists working with RPDS did not differ significantly from those using manual dispensing systems. However, the median of personal burnout levels in female pharmacists (Mdn = 50) differed significantly from those using manual dispensing systems (Mdn = 25; U = 3497.5, z = -7.8, p < 0.001, r = -0.49). In contrast, male pharmacists exhibited higher levels of technology acceptance (U = 11,357, z = 5.58, p < 0.001, r = 0.35; U = 10,391, z = 4.0, p < 0.001, r = 0.25).
Conclusion: This study explored the differences in burnout, depression levels, and TAM among employees working in public hospitals in the United Arab of Emirates. Overall, automation had both positive and negative effects on workplace stressors experienced by pharmacy staff.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.