淋巴结比例(LNR)对pN1a-b和pN2期iii期结肠癌预后的判别

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.104336
Erman Akkus, Mehmet Kayaalp, Beliz Bahar Karaoğlan, Cihangir Akyol, Güngör Utkan
{"title":"淋巴结比例(LNR)对pN1a-b和pN2期iii期结肠癌预后的判别","authors":"Erman Akkus, Mehmet Kayaalp, Beliz Bahar Karaoğlan, Cihangir Akyol, Güngör Utkan","doi":"10.7150/jca.104336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The lymph node ratio (LNR), involved nodes/ lymph nodes examined, is associated with survival in colon cancer. Previous studies investigated the prognostic role of LNR regardless of TNM N staging or compared LNR and TNM N stages for prognostic strength. However, LNR may be utilized to obtain additional prognostic information rather than replacing TNM staging in daily practice. This study aimed to evaluate the role of LNR in TNM N stages to provide further prognostic information in daily practice. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with stage-III colon cancer who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. pN1c tumors (tumor deposits without node involvement) and rectal cancers were excluded. Clinicopathological parameters and LNR in pN1a-b and pN2 groups were evaluated for recurrence-free survival (RFS). <b>Results:</b> A total of 97 patients were included [pN1a-b: n=69 (71.1%) and pN2: n=28 (28.9%)]. Median LNR in the entire population was 0.09 (0.01-0.84) with a median lymph node examined of 22 (8-89) and involved of 2 (1-17). Median RFS was not reached in the pN1a-b and pN2 groups during a median follow-up of 20.8 months (1.13-101.03), with significantly better survival of the pN1a-b group (p=0.003). Among the pN1a-b group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.10. LNR significantly discriminated RFS (Median not-reached, p=0.001). Among the pN2 group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.25 and LNR significantly discriminated RFS [Not reached vs. 11.40 months (95%CI: 3.57-16.83), p=0.004]. Combined pN-LNR groups revealed significant discrimination in RFS (p<0.001). RFS was not statistically different between pN2-LNR≤0.25 and pN1-LNR>0.10 groups (p=0.282). In multivariable analysis with clinicopathological parameters, only LNR was significant (p=0.023), whereas the pN stage did not remain significant (p=0.637). <b>Conclusion:</b> LNR adds further prognostication in pN1a-b and N2 groups. LNR may be utilized to detect patient subgroups in different TNM N sages (pN1a-b and pN2) but with similar prognoses. This further prognostic information may assist clinical decisions in practice. The results of this study emphasize an adequate and higher number of lymph node samples in surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 4","pages":"1032-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) Discriminates Prognostication in pN1a-b and pN2 Stage-III Colon Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Erman Akkus, Mehmet Kayaalp, Beliz Bahar Karaoğlan, Cihangir Akyol, Güngör Utkan\",\"doi\":\"10.7150/jca.104336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The lymph node ratio (LNR), involved nodes/ lymph nodes examined, is associated with survival in colon cancer. Previous studies investigated the prognostic role of LNR regardless of TNM N staging or compared LNR and TNM N stages for prognostic strength. However, LNR may be utilized to obtain additional prognostic information rather than replacing TNM staging in daily practice. This study aimed to evaluate the role of LNR in TNM N stages to provide further prognostic information in daily practice. <b>Methods:</b> Patients with stage-III colon cancer who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. pN1c tumors (tumor deposits without node involvement) and rectal cancers were excluded. Clinicopathological parameters and LNR in pN1a-b and pN2 groups were evaluated for recurrence-free survival (RFS). <b>Results:</b> A total of 97 patients were included [pN1a-b: n=69 (71.1%) and pN2: n=28 (28.9%)]. Median LNR in the entire population was 0.09 (0.01-0.84) with a median lymph node examined of 22 (8-89) and involved of 2 (1-17). Median RFS was not reached in the pN1a-b and pN2 groups during a median follow-up of 20.8 months (1.13-101.03), with significantly better survival of the pN1a-b group (p=0.003). Among the pN1a-b group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.10. LNR significantly discriminated RFS (Median not-reached, p=0.001). Among the pN2 group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.25 and LNR significantly discriminated RFS [Not reached vs. 11.40 months (95%CI: 3.57-16.83), p=0.004]. Combined pN-LNR groups revealed significant discrimination in RFS (p<0.001). RFS was not statistically different between pN2-LNR≤0.25 and pN1-LNR>0.10 groups (p=0.282). In multivariable analysis with clinicopathological parameters, only LNR was significant (p=0.023), whereas the pN stage did not remain significant (p=0.637). <b>Conclusion:</b> LNR adds further prognostication in pN1a-b and N2 groups. LNR may be utilized to detect patient subgroups in different TNM N sages (pN1a-b and pN2) but with similar prognoses. This further prognostic information may assist clinical decisions in practice. The results of this study emphasize an adequate and higher number of lymph node samples in surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"1032-1039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.104336\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.104336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结肠癌患者的淋巴结比例(LNR),受累淋巴结/淋巴结检查,与生存率相关。先前的研究调查了LNR在TNM N分期中的预后作用,或比较了LNR和TNM N分期的预后强度。然而,在日常实践中,LNR可用于获得额外的预后信息,而不是代替TNM分期。本研究旨在评估LNR在TNM N分期中的作用,以在日常实践中提供进一步的预后信息。方法:接受手术和辅助化疗的iii期结肠癌患者。排除pN1c肿瘤(未累及淋巴结的肿瘤沉积)和直肠癌。评估pN1a-b组和pN2组的临床病理参数和LNR,以评估无复发生存期(RFS)。结果:共纳入97例患者[pN1a-b: n=69 (71.1%), pN2: n=28(28.9%)]。整个人群的中位LNR为0.09(0.01-0.84),中位淋巴结检查22(8-89),受累2(1-17)。在中位随访20.8个月(1.13-101.03)期间,pN1a-b组和pN2组的中位RFS未达到,pN1a-b组的生存率显著高于pN1a-b组(p=0.003)。在pN1a-b组中,LNR临界值设为0.10。LNR显著区分RFS(中位数未达到,p=0.001)。在pN2组中,LNR临界值设为0.25,LNR显著区分RFS[未达到vs. 11.40个月(95%CI: 3.57-16.83), p=0.004]。pN-LNR联合组RFS差异有统计学意义(p=0.282)。在临床病理参数的多变量分析中,只有LNR有统计学意义(p=0.023),而pN分期无统计学意义(p=0.637)。结论:LNR可进一步提高pN1a-b和N2组患者的预后。LNR可用于检测不同TNM N类型(pN1a-b和pN2)的患者亚组,但预后相似。这一进一步的预后信息可以在实践中帮助临床决策。本研究的结果强调手术中淋巴结样本的足够和更多的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) Discriminates Prognostication in pN1a-b and pN2 Stage-III Colon Cancer.

Background: The lymph node ratio (LNR), involved nodes/ lymph nodes examined, is associated with survival in colon cancer. Previous studies investigated the prognostic role of LNR regardless of TNM N staging or compared LNR and TNM N stages for prognostic strength. However, LNR may be utilized to obtain additional prognostic information rather than replacing TNM staging in daily practice. This study aimed to evaluate the role of LNR in TNM N stages to provide further prognostic information in daily practice. Methods: Patients with stage-III colon cancer who underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. pN1c tumors (tumor deposits without node involvement) and rectal cancers were excluded. Clinicopathological parameters and LNR in pN1a-b and pN2 groups were evaluated for recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: A total of 97 patients were included [pN1a-b: n=69 (71.1%) and pN2: n=28 (28.9%)]. Median LNR in the entire population was 0.09 (0.01-0.84) with a median lymph node examined of 22 (8-89) and involved of 2 (1-17). Median RFS was not reached in the pN1a-b and pN2 groups during a median follow-up of 20.8 months (1.13-101.03), with significantly better survival of the pN1a-b group (p=0.003). Among the pN1a-b group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.10. LNR significantly discriminated RFS (Median not-reached, p=0.001). Among the pN2 group, the LNR cut-off was set as 0.25 and LNR significantly discriminated RFS [Not reached vs. 11.40 months (95%CI: 3.57-16.83), p=0.004]. Combined pN-LNR groups revealed significant discrimination in RFS (p<0.001). RFS was not statistically different between pN2-LNR≤0.25 and pN1-LNR>0.10 groups (p=0.282). In multivariable analysis with clinicopathological parameters, only LNR was significant (p=0.023), whereas the pN stage did not remain significant (p=0.637). Conclusion: LNR adds further prognostication in pN1a-b and N2 groups. LNR may be utilized to detect patient subgroups in different TNM N sages (pN1a-b and pN2) but with similar prognoses. This further prognostic information may assist clinical decisions in practice. The results of this study emphasize an adequate and higher number of lymph node samples in surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
A CRM-Integrated ypT Staging System Improves Prognostic Stratification Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer. Integrative Multi-Omics and Single-Cell Profiling Identify Chitinase Domain Containing Protein 1 (CHID1) as a Prognostic Biomarker in Glioblastoma. Recurrence of Adult Granulosa Cell Tumors: The Factors Affecting Secondary Recurrence and Survival After Recurrence. Integrative analysis of lysosome-dependent cell death related molecular subtypes and prognosis prediction in papillary thyroid carcinoma. FAM188B promotes progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating YAP/TAZ via interaction with USP10.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1