专家和市民对能源转型驱动因素的看法:一种心理模型方法

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144949
K.L. van den Broek , L. de Jager , R. Doran , G. Böhm
{"title":"专家和市民对能源转型驱动因素的看法:一种心理模型方法","authors":"K.L. van den Broek ,&nbsp;L. de Jager ,&nbsp;R. Doran ,&nbsp;G. Böhm","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How actors perceive the transition pathways towards sustainable energy production and use will likely influence their support in their everyday behaviour and political engagement towards the energy transition. Mapping actors’ mental models of the drivers of the energy transition can provide key insights into such perceptions. The present study is the first to systematically map mental models of the drivers of the energy transition, compare mental models between actor groups, and explain differences in mental models with political orientation and worry about climate change. We mapped mental models about the energy transition among a sample of experts (<em>N</em> = 25), and representative samples of Dutch (<em>N</em> = 299) and Norwegian (<em>N</em> = 313) citizens. Participants visualised their perceptions of the causal relations of different energy transition pathways by drawing a diagram using a standardised tool to map mental models (M-Tool). The results demonstrate (1) a key focus in the mental models on renewable energy generation such as solar panels, wind farms, and hydropower, (2) that expert mental models are more focused on policy pathways compared to citizen mental models, (3) that mental models of actors leaning towards the political right focus less on individual behaviour than left-leaning actors, and (4) that climate change worry results in more focus on individual behaviour and policy pathways in the mental models. Policymakers could use these insights to engage citizens with the energy transition, for example, by tailoring their messages to the mental models of the target group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"494 ","pages":"Article 144949"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert and citizen perceptions of the drivers of the energy transition: A mental model approach\",\"authors\":\"K.L. van den Broek ,&nbsp;L. de Jager ,&nbsp;R. Doran ,&nbsp;G. Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>How actors perceive the transition pathways towards sustainable energy production and use will likely influence their support in their everyday behaviour and political engagement towards the energy transition. Mapping actors’ mental models of the drivers of the energy transition can provide key insights into such perceptions. The present study is the first to systematically map mental models of the drivers of the energy transition, compare mental models between actor groups, and explain differences in mental models with political orientation and worry about climate change. We mapped mental models about the energy transition among a sample of experts (<em>N</em> = 25), and representative samples of Dutch (<em>N</em> = 299) and Norwegian (<em>N</em> = 313) citizens. Participants visualised their perceptions of the causal relations of different energy transition pathways by drawing a diagram using a standardised tool to map mental models (M-Tool). The results demonstrate (1) a key focus in the mental models on renewable energy generation such as solar panels, wind farms, and hydropower, (2) that expert mental models are more focused on policy pathways compared to citizen mental models, (3) that mental models of actors leaning towards the political right focus less on individual behaviour than left-leaning actors, and (4) that climate change worry results in more focus on individual behaviour and policy pathways in the mental models. Policymakers could use these insights to engage citizens with the energy transition, for example, by tailoring their messages to the mental models of the target group.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"494 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625002999\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625002999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为体如何看待向可持续能源生产和使用的过渡途径,可能会影响他们对能源转型的日常行为和政治参与的支持。绘制参与者对能源转型驱动因素的心理模型,可以为了解这些看法提供关键见解。本研究首次系统地绘制了能源转型驱动因素的心理模型,比较了行动者群体之间的心理模型,并解释了政治取向和对气候变化的担忧在心理模型上的差异。我们在专家样本(N=25)、荷兰(N=299)和挪威(N=313)公民的代表性样本中绘制了关于能源转换的心理模型。参与者通过使用一种标准化的心理模型映射工具(M-Tool)绘制图表,将他们对不同能量转换路径因果关系的感知可视化。结果表明:(1)专家心智模型比公民心智模型更关注政策路径;(3)政治右倾行为者心智模型比左倾行为者心智模型更关注个人行为;(4)气候变化担忧导致心智模型更关注个人行为和政策路径。政策制定者可以利用这些见解让公民参与能源转型,例如,根据目标群体的思维模式调整他们的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert and citizen perceptions of the drivers of the energy transition: A mental model approach
How actors perceive the transition pathways towards sustainable energy production and use will likely influence their support in their everyday behaviour and political engagement towards the energy transition. Mapping actors’ mental models of the drivers of the energy transition can provide key insights into such perceptions. The present study is the first to systematically map mental models of the drivers of the energy transition, compare mental models between actor groups, and explain differences in mental models with political orientation and worry about climate change. We mapped mental models about the energy transition among a sample of experts (N = 25), and representative samples of Dutch (N = 299) and Norwegian (N = 313) citizens. Participants visualised their perceptions of the causal relations of different energy transition pathways by drawing a diagram using a standardised tool to map mental models (M-Tool). The results demonstrate (1) a key focus in the mental models on renewable energy generation such as solar panels, wind farms, and hydropower, (2) that expert mental models are more focused on policy pathways compared to citizen mental models, (3) that mental models of actors leaning towards the political right focus less on individual behaviour than left-leaning actors, and (4) that climate change worry results in more focus on individual behaviour and policy pathways in the mental models. Policymakers could use these insights to engage citizens with the energy transition, for example, by tailoring their messages to the mental models of the target group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Thermophilic/hyperthermophilic stage as component of temperature-phased anaerobic digestion or pretreatment of mesophilic digestion to enhance bio-methanation of oily food waste? Using interpretable machine learning method to predict children's fluoride exposure health risks based on routine water quality data: An empirical study in the Huaihe River Basin, China Spatiotemporal degradation of coastal ecosystem services in mainland China: A land-sea integrated assessment Moisture-regulated pad dyeing of cotton fabrics: mechanistic insights into water migration and energy-efficient fixation Novel dual-cone hydrocyclone for efficient recovery of micron-sized catalyst: Turbulence suppression and separation enhancement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1