基于行走测量和土壤通量测量的输配电管道泄漏识别与表征

Ellis S. Robinson,  and , Peter F. DeCarlo*, 
{"title":"基于行走测量和土壤通量测量的输配电管道泄漏识别与表征","authors":"Ellis S. Robinson,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Peter F. DeCarlo*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We identified fugitive methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) leaks within natural gas transmission and distribution pipeline rights of way (ROWs) around Pittsburgh, PA, and Baltimore, MD, by means of a walking survey while measuring ambient methane and ethane (C<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub>) mixing ratios. We used the methane time series to determine discrete leaks using a simple algorithm and verified that the methane was fossil in origin via the methane-to-ethane ratio. For transmission ROWs, we found an average of 23 leaks (range of 12 to 47) over 20.1 total km, corresponding to an activity factor (AF) of 1.1 leaks/km (range 0.60 to 2.3 leaks/km). We also quantified total methane emissions for a subset (<i>N</i> = 5) of the identified leaks using a soil flux measurement chamber. The mean leak emission rate (ER) was 172 g/h/leak (range 17 to 452 g/h/leak). Our AF is higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate for transmission pipelines, which is 0.02 leaks/km. Our mean ER is also larger than the GHGI estimate for protected steel pipelines (44 g/h/leak). This study provides a model for making AF and ER measurements in vegetated environments with difficult terrain and suggests fugitive emissions from transmission pipelines may be a more significant source of atmospheric methane than is currently outlined in the GHGI.</p><p >This study presents activity (leaks per km) and emission rates (grams per hour per leak) measurements from natural gas transmission pipelines, which have received very little attention as a source of fugitive methane compared to distribution and gathering pipelines. Our results indicate that transmission pipelines may be a more substantial source of fugitive methane than is suggested by current inventories.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 1","pages":"31–39 31–39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transmission and Distribution Pipeline Leak Identification and Characterization by Walking Survey and Soil Flux Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Ellis S. Robinson,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Peter F. DeCarlo*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.4c00109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >We identified fugitive methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) leaks within natural gas transmission and distribution pipeline rights of way (ROWs) around Pittsburgh, PA, and Baltimore, MD, by means of a walking survey while measuring ambient methane and ethane (C<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub>) mixing ratios. We used the methane time series to determine discrete leaks using a simple algorithm and verified that the methane was fossil in origin via the methane-to-ethane ratio. For transmission ROWs, we found an average of 23 leaks (range of 12 to 47) over 20.1 total km, corresponding to an activity factor (AF) of 1.1 leaks/km (range 0.60 to 2.3 leaks/km). We also quantified total methane emissions for a subset (<i>N</i> = 5) of the identified leaks using a soil flux measurement chamber. The mean leak emission rate (ER) was 172 g/h/leak (range 17 to 452 g/h/leak). Our AF is higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate for transmission pipelines, which is 0.02 leaks/km. Our mean ER is also larger than the GHGI estimate for protected steel pipelines (44 g/h/leak). This study provides a model for making AF and ER measurements in vegetated environments with difficult terrain and suggests fugitive emissions from transmission pipelines may be a more significant source of atmospheric methane than is currently outlined in the GHGI.</p><p >This study presents activity (leaks per km) and emission rates (grams per hour per leak) measurements from natural gas transmission pipelines, which have received very little attention as a source of fugitive methane compared to distribution and gathering pipelines. Our results indicate that transmission pipelines may be a more substantial source of fugitive methane than is suggested by current inventories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"31–39 31–39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在测量环境甲烷和乙烷(C2 H6)混合比率的同时,通过步行调查,在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡和马里兰州巴尔的摩附近的天然气输送和分配管道中确定了逸散性甲烷(CH4)泄漏。我们使用甲烷时间序列,通过简单的算法确定离散泄漏,并通过甲烷与乙烷的比例验证甲烷的起源是化石。对于传输ROWs,我们发现在20.1总公里中平均有23个泄漏(范围为12至47),对应于活动因子(AF)为1.1泄漏/公里(范围为0.60至2.3泄漏/公里)。我们还使用土壤通量测量室量化了已确定泄漏的一个子集(N = 5)的甲烷总排放量。平均泄漏排放率(ER)为172 g/h/渗漏(范围为17 ~ 452 g/h/渗漏)。我们的AF高于美国环境保护署(Environmental Protection Agency)的温室气体清单(GHGI)对输气管道的估计,即每公里0.02泄漏。我们的平均ER也大于受保护钢管道的GHGI估估值(44 g/h/泄漏)。这项研究为在地形复杂的植被环境中进行AF和ER测量提供了一个模型,并表明输气管道的逸散性排放可能是比GHGI中目前概述的更重要的大气甲烷来源。本研究展示了天然气输送管道的活动性(每公里泄漏量)和排放率(每小时每泄漏克数)测量结果,与分配和收集管道相比,天然气输送管道作为逸散性甲烷的来源很少受到关注。我们的研究结果表明,输送管道可能是逸散性甲烷的一个更重要的来源,而不是目前的清单所显示的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transmission and Distribution Pipeline Leak Identification and Characterization by Walking Survey and Soil Flux Measurements

We identified fugitive methane (CH4) leaks within natural gas transmission and distribution pipeline rights of way (ROWs) around Pittsburgh, PA, and Baltimore, MD, by means of a walking survey while measuring ambient methane and ethane (C2 H6) mixing ratios. We used the methane time series to determine discrete leaks using a simple algorithm and verified that the methane was fossil in origin via the methane-to-ethane ratio. For transmission ROWs, we found an average of 23 leaks (range of 12 to 47) over 20.1 total km, corresponding to an activity factor (AF) of 1.1 leaks/km (range 0.60 to 2.3 leaks/km). We also quantified total methane emissions for a subset (N = 5) of the identified leaks using a soil flux measurement chamber. The mean leak emission rate (ER) was 172 g/h/leak (range 17 to 452 g/h/leak). Our AF is higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate for transmission pipelines, which is 0.02 leaks/km. Our mean ER is also larger than the GHGI estimate for protected steel pipelines (44 g/h/leak). This study provides a model for making AF and ER measurements in vegetated environments with difficult terrain and suggests fugitive emissions from transmission pipelines may be a more significant source of atmospheric methane than is currently outlined in the GHGI.

This study presents activity (leaks per km) and emission rates (grams per hour per leak) measurements from natural gas transmission pipelines, which have received very little attention as a source of fugitive methane compared to distribution and gathering pipelines. Our results indicate that transmission pipelines may be a more substantial source of fugitive methane than is suggested by current inventories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of a Chemical Index to Aerosol Mass Spectrometry: Delta Plots and Functional Group Distributions. Toward Linking Indoor Commercial Source Emissions to Outdoor Volatile Organic Compounds Using Mobile Measurements. Assessing above-ground fuel storage tank emissions using lower-cost sensor packages and triggered canister samples. Source Contributions to Air Pollution in the Permian Basin: Evaluating Emissions from Unconventional Oil and Gas Activities. Multiphase Chemistry and Phase State Explain Nonlinear Effects in the Formation and Evaporation of SOA from Mixed Monoterpene Precursors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1