在废弃农田的自然殖民化有利于本地,昆虫授粉和鸟类分散的木本物种

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100755
N.K. Pedersen, S. Kepfer-Rojas, T. Riis-Nielsen, V.K. Johannsen, I.K. Schmidt
{"title":"在废弃农田的自然殖民化有利于本地,昆虫授粉和鸟类分散的木本物种","authors":"N.K. Pedersen,&nbsp;S. Kepfer-Rojas,&nbsp;T. Riis-Nielsen,&nbsp;V.K. Johannsen,&nbsp;I.K. Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests play a crucial role in countering the climate and biodiversity crisis. Increasing forest cover is proposed as one of the most cost-effective tools to mitigate climate change, but the effects of afforestation methods on biodiversity are unclear. The abandonment of farmland for natural colonization has emerged as a resource-efficient approach, though the pace and predictability of colonization raise questions about its contribution to enhancing biodiversity in emerging forests. We analyzed tree and shrub species richness and composition in 31 natural colonization areas on agricultural land abandoned between 1990 and 2018 in Denmark and compared them with forest plantations of similar ages registered in the National Forest Inventory (NFI). As proxies for overall biodiversity, we compared the dominance and distribution of native, insect-pollinated, and bird-dispersed species. Although overall woody-species richness in plantations was higher than in natural colonization, the share of native, bird-dispersed, and insect-pollinated species was higher in natural colonization sites. Notably, approximately 70 % of the native woody species registered in Danish NFI were identified in the 31 natural colonization sites. Species richness in natural colonization areas was markedly higher on loamy than sandy soils, whereas in plantations, the number of species was similar between the two soil types. Furthermore, comparing different soil types, woody species composition was more similar in plantations than in natural colonization. These results demonstrate that afforestation with natural colonization favors native woody species and species associated with higher biodiversity, especially in loamy soils.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural colonization in abandoned agricultural fields benefits native, insect-pollinated and bird-dispersed woody species\",\"authors\":\"N.K. Pedersen,&nbsp;S. Kepfer-Rojas,&nbsp;T. Riis-Nielsen,&nbsp;V.K. Johannsen,&nbsp;I.K. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forests play a crucial role in countering the climate and biodiversity crisis. Increasing forest cover is proposed as one of the most cost-effective tools to mitigate climate change, but the effects of afforestation methods on biodiversity are unclear. The abandonment of farmland for natural colonization has emerged as a resource-efficient approach, though the pace and predictability of colonization raise questions about its contribution to enhancing biodiversity in emerging forests. We analyzed tree and shrub species richness and composition in 31 natural colonization areas on agricultural land abandoned between 1990 and 2018 in Denmark and compared them with forest plantations of similar ages registered in the National Forest Inventory (NFI). As proxies for overall biodiversity, we compared the dominance and distribution of native, insect-pollinated, and bird-dispersed species. Although overall woody-species richness in plantations was higher than in natural colonization, the share of native, bird-dispersed, and insect-pollinated species was higher in natural colonization sites. Notably, approximately 70 % of the native woody species registered in Danish NFI were identified in the 31 natural colonization sites. Species richness in natural colonization areas was markedly higher on loamy than sandy soils, whereas in plantations, the number of species was similar between the two soil types. Furthermore, comparing different soil types, woody species composition was more similar in plantations than in natural colonization. These results demonstrate that afforestation with natural colonization favors native woody species and species associated with higher biodiversity, especially in loamy soils.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324002619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林在应对气候和生物多样性危机方面发挥着关键作用。增加森林覆盖被认为是减缓气候变化最具成本效益的手段之一,但造林方法对生物多样性的影响尚不清楚。放弃农田进行自然殖民化已经成为一种节约资源的方法,尽管殖民化的速度和可预测性引发了人们对其对增强新兴森林生物多样性的贡献的质疑。我们分析了1990年至2018年间丹麦31个撂撂地自然定植区的树木和灌木物种丰富度和组成,并将其与国家森林清查(NFI)中登记的相似年龄的森林人工林进行了比较。作为总体生物多样性的代表,我们比较了本地、昆虫传粉和鸟类分散的物种的优势和分布。虽然人工林的整体木本物种丰富度高于自然定植地,但在自然定植地,本地、鸟类分散和昆虫传粉的物种所占比例更高。值得注意的是,在丹麦国家自然保护区登记的本地木本物种中,约70%是在31个自然定植点发现的。自然定植区的物种丰富度在壤土上明显高于沙土,而在人工林中,两种土壤类型的物种丰富度基本相同。不同土壤类型相比,人工林的木本树种组成更接近于自然定殖地。这些结果表明,自然定植造林有利于本地木本物种和生物多样性较高的物种,特别是在壤土中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Natural colonization in abandoned agricultural fields benefits native, insect-pollinated and bird-dispersed woody species
Forests play a crucial role in countering the climate and biodiversity crisis. Increasing forest cover is proposed as one of the most cost-effective tools to mitigate climate change, but the effects of afforestation methods on biodiversity are unclear. The abandonment of farmland for natural colonization has emerged as a resource-efficient approach, though the pace and predictability of colonization raise questions about its contribution to enhancing biodiversity in emerging forests. We analyzed tree and shrub species richness and composition in 31 natural colonization areas on agricultural land abandoned between 1990 and 2018 in Denmark and compared them with forest plantations of similar ages registered in the National Forest Inventory (NFI). As proxies for overall biodiversity, we compared the dominance and distribution of native, insect-pollinated, and bird-dispersed species. Although overall woody-species richness in plantations was higher than in natural colonization, the share of native, bird-dispersed, and insect-pollinated species was higher in natural colonization sites. Notably, approximately 70 % of the native woody species registered in Danish NFI were identified in the 31 natural colonization sites. Species richness in natural colonization areas was markedly higher on loamy than sandy soils, whereas in plantations, the number of species was similar between the two soil types. Furthermore, comparing different soil types, woody species composition was more similar in plantations than in natural colonization. These results demonstrate that afforestation with natural colonization favors native woody species and species associated with higher biodiversity, especially in loamy soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Bird community patterns and indicator species for monitoring fragmented Miombo and Mopane woodlands in southern Zambia Multifunctional sustainability benefits of rubber agroforestry: Evidence from rubber–Alpinia oxyphylla systems in tropical China Fire, culture and conservation: an ethnographic study of charcoal production in agroforestry systems of the Sierra of Zongolica, Mexico Different urban densities, different tree cover densities: Evidence from multimodal data in VR-based experiments Potential for climate change mitigation in protected areas of the Brazilian Cerrado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1