{"title":"在复杂的谈判中赋予销售人员权力:准备和让步时的自主权和回旋余地","authors":"Christine Lai-Bennejean , Aaron D Arndt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115233"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making\",\"authors\":\"Christine Lai-Bennejean , Aaron D Arndt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000566\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making
This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.