在复杂的谈判中赋予销售人员权力:准备和让步时的自主权和回旋余地

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233
Christine Lai-Bennejean , Aaron D Arndt
{"title":"在复杂的谈判中赋予销售人员权力:准备和让步时的自主权和回旋余地","authors":"Christine Lai-Bennejean ,&nbsp;Aaron D Arndt","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115233"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making\",\"authors\":\"Christine Lai-Bennejean ,&nbsp;Aaron D Arndt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"190 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000566\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨销售员在谈判决策中的自主性如何影响他们在多议题谈判中的预期准备努力和初始立场的设定。虽然大量文献研究了销售组织内部的价格谈判,但影响销售人员为多议题谈判做准备的因素仍未得到充分探讨。本研究主要关注两种类型的谈判自主,即与谈判决策相关的敬业自主和与设定具体条款相关的发布自主。三个基于受试者场景的实验研究分别涉及139名、103名和132名销售人员/客服人员。结果显示,当获得更高的敬业度自主权时,销售人员预期会在多议题谈判中投入更多的准备工作。我们还观察到,当与价格相关的业务参与和发行自主权都受到限制时,预期的准备工作更大。然而,这种增加的预期工作伴随着更多的客户有利的初始位置,这表明更高的预期准备工作不一定会导致更强的初始位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empowering salespeople in complex negotiations: autonomy and leeway in preparation and concession-making
This research investigates how salesperson autonomy in negotiation decision-making influences their anticipated preparation effort and the setting of initial positions in multi-issue negotiations. While extensive literature examines price negotiations within sales organizations, the factors shaping salespeople’s preparation for multi-issue negotiations remains underexplored. This research focuses on two types of negotiation autonomy, engagement autonomy related to the decision to negotiate and, issue autonomy related to setting specific terms. Three between-subjects scenario-based experimental studies involving 139, 103, and 132 salespeople/customer service employees, respectively, are conducted. The results show that, when granted higher engagement autonomy, salespeople anticipate investing more preparation effort into multi-issue negotiations. We also observed greater anticipated preparation effort when both engagement and issue autonomy related to price were constrained. Yet, this increased anticipated effort was accompanied by more customer-favorable initial positions, suggesting that higher anticipated preparation effort does not necessarily lead to stronger initial positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Standing out while fitting in: content strategy and performance in social media marketing Categorizing customer perceptions of sustainable product packaging: Analyzing online reviews using large language models Artificial intelligence as a catalyst for ESG improvement: mechanisms and empirical evidence from manufacturing enterprises Creating enabling environments: a strengths-based framework for transformative service initiatives Digital transformation and organizational resilience: a resource orchestration perspective on R&D investment intensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1