{"title":"分析拉丁美洲全球南部货币供应、矿产开采、工业化和生态足迹之间的相互作用:一个对称的视角","authors":"Waqas Amin , Shouhong Xie , Abdul Rauf","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of money supply, natural resource use, mineral extraction, industrialization, green energy use, and population density on the ecological footprint (EFP) in 11 high natural resource–based Latin American Global South nations from 1990 to 2021. The study employs Westerlund bootstrap LM, pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality tests. Initially, Westerlund Bootstrap LM statistics reveal significant evidence of cointegration among the variables. Second, the PMG model results show that all regressors except green energy use have a significant positive effect on EFP in the long run, whereas, in the short run, all variables are found to have insignificant impact, excluding green energy use and industrialization. Finally, Dumitrescu and Hurlin tests indicate unidirectional causality of all the regressors with EFP, except mineral extraction and population density. The findings reveal some valuable policy implications for reducing EFP. Initially, central banks must initially limit money supply while altering the interest rate minimally. Over time, central banks must also promote green lending practices in industrial production sectors and charge higher interest on loans to firms that use outdated technology in industrial production. Furthermore, firms engaged in mineral and natural resource extraction must replace old equipment with new technologies that use green energy to curtail pollution emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105422"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the interplay between money supply, mineral extraction, industrialization, and ecological footprint in latin America's global south: A symmetrical perspective\",\"authors\":\"Waqas Amin , Shouhong Xie , Abdul Rauf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The primary goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of money supply, natural resource use, mineral extraction, industrialization, green energy use, and population density on the ecological footprint (EFP) in 11 high natural resource–based Latin American Global South nations from 1990 to 2021. The study employs Westerlund bootstrap LM, pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality tests. Initially, Westerlund Bootstrap LM statistics reveal significant evidence of cointegration among the variables. Second, the PMG model results show that all regressors except green energy use have a significant positive effect on EFP in the long run, whereas, in the short run, all variables are found to have insignificant impact, excluding green energy use and industrialization. Finally, Dumitrescu and Hurlin tests indicate unidirectional causality of all the regressors with EFP, except mineral extraction and population density. The findings reveal some valuable policy implications for reducing EFP. Initially, central banks must initially limit money supply while altering the interest rate minimally. Over time, central banks must also promote green lending practices in industrial production sectors and charge higher interest on loans to firms that use outdated technology in industrial production. Furthermore, firms engaged in mineral and natural resource extraction must replace old equipment with new technologies that use green energy to curtail pollution emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072400789X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072400789X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的主要目标是研究1990年至2021年间,货币供应、自然资源利用、矿产开采、工业化、绿色能源使用和人口密度对11个自然资源依赖度高的拉丁美洲全球南方国家生态足迹(EFP)的长期影响。本研究采用Westerlund bootstrap LM、PMG-ARDL (pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag)、Dumitrescu和Hurlin因果检验。最初,Westerlund Bootstrap LM统计揭示了变量之间协整的显著证据。第二,PMG模型结果表明,除绿色能源利用外,所有回归变量对EFP的长期正向影响显著,而在短期内,除绿色能源利用和工业化外,所有变量对EFP的影响都不显著。最后,Dumitrescu和Hurlin检验表明,除矿产开采和人口密度外,所有回归因子都与EFP呈单向因果关系。研究结果揭示了减少EFP的一些有价值的政策含义。首先,中央银行必须在最低限度地调整利率的同时限制货币供应量。随着时间的推移,央行还必须促进工业生产部门的绿色贷款做法,并对在工业生产中使用过时技术的公司收取更高的贷款利息。此外,从事矿物和自然资源开采的公司必须用使用绿色能源的新技术取代旧设备,以减少污染排放。
Analyzing the interplay between money supply, mineral extraction, industrialization, and ecological footprint in latin America's global south: A symmetrical perspective
The primary goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of money supply, natural resource use, mineral extraction, industrialization, green energy use, and population density on the ecological footprint (EFP) in 11 high natural resource–based Latin American Global South nations from 1990 to 2021. The study employs Westerlund bootstrap LM, pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality tests. Initially, Westerlund Bootstrap LM statistics reveal significant evidence of cointegration among the variables. Second, the PMG model results show that all regressors except green energy use have a significant positive effect on EFP in the long run, whereas, in the short run, all variables are found to have insignificant impact, excluding green energy use and industrialization. Finally, Dumitrescu and Hurlin tests indicate unidirectional causality of all the regressors with EFP, except mineral extraction and population density. The findings reveal some valuable policy implications for reducing EFP. Initially, central banks must initially limit money supply while altering the interest rate minimally. Over time, central banks must also promote green lending practices in industrial production sectors and charge higher interest on loans to firms that use outdated technology in industrial production. Furthermore, firms engaged in mineral and natural resource extraction must replace old equipment with new technologies that use green energy to curtail pollution emissions.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.