专家对中巴经济走廊可持续性评估的看法:明智决策的SWOT分析

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104009
Abdul Waheed , Sajida Kousar , Muhammad Irfan Khan , Thomas Bernward Fischer
{"title":"专家对中巴经济走廊可持续性评估的看法:明智决策的SWOT分析","authors":"Abdul Waheed ,&nbsp;Sajida Kousar ,&nbsp;Muhammad Irfan Khan ,&nbsp;Thomas Bernward Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Globally, the pursuit of sustainable development (SD) is of key importance. Sustainability assessments of large-scale infrastructure development projects play a critical role in balancing economic growth with social, environmental, and climate responsibilities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key initiative for regional and global economic advancement. It can also serve as a case study for sustainable development practices. This paper presents results from a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to explore the sustainability of the CPEC plan 2017–2030. A mixed method approach of SWOT Analysis integrated with multicriteria decision-making methods, including the Best Worst Method- mV Model (a linear programming method) has been applied to analyze, weight, and rank SWOT criteria. A survey of experts was conducted to scale assessment criteria related to CPEC sustainability. Results highlight that with regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position is the highest scoring criterion, and with regards to “internal weakness criteria”, increased dependency on China is the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position was identified as the highest scoring criterion and cultural friendliness as the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal weakness criteria”, technological inefficiencies were identified as the best, and increased dependency on China as the worst scoring criteria. In the context of “external opportunity’s criteria”, increased job opportunities and regional connectivity were the highest scoring criteria, and mutual trade gain was the lowest scoring criterion. Finally, for “external threats criteria”, natural resource exploitation was identified as the best scoring criterion. The results highlight the need to diversify partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative in order to enhance environmental friendliness, and climate resilience, as well as to reducedependency risks, and foster equitable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104009"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert perceptions on CPEC sustainability appraisal: SWOT analysis for informed policy decisions\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Waheed ,&nbsp;Sajida Kousar ,&nbsp;Muhammad Irfan Khan ,&nbsp;Thomas Bernward Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Globally, the pursuit of sustainable development (SD) is of key importance. Sustainability assessments of large-scale infrastructure development projects play a critical role in balancing economic growth with social, environmental, and climate responsibilities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key initiative for regional and global economic advancement. It can also serve as a case study for sustainable development practices. This paper presents results from a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to explore the sustainability of the CPEC plan 2017–2030. A mixed method approach of SWOT Analysis integrated with multicriteria decision-making methods, including the Best Worst Method- mV Model (a linear programming method) has been applied to analyze, weight, and rank SWOT criteria. A survey of experts was conducted to scale assessment criteria related to CPEC sustainability. Results highlight that with regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position is the highest scoring criterion, and with regards to “internal weakness criteria”, increased dependency on China is the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position was identified as the highest scoring criterion and cultural friendliness as the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal weakness criteria”, technological inefficiencies were identified as the best, and increased dependency on China as the worst scoring criteria. In the context of “external opportunity’s criteria”, increased job opportunities and regional connectivity were the highest scoring criteria, and mutual trade gain was the lowest scoring criterion. Finally, for “external threats criteria”, natural resource exploitation was identified as the best scoring criterion. The results highlight the need to diversify partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative in order to enhance environmental friendliness, and climate resilience, as well as to reducedependency risks, and foster equitable development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000255\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,追求可持续发展至关重要。大型基础设施发展项目的可持续性评估在平衡经济增长与社会、环境和气候责任方面发挥着关键作用。中巴经济走廊是促进地区和全球经济发展的重要倡议。它还可以作为可持续发展实践的案例研究。本文通过SWOT(优势、劣势、机会和威胁)分析,探讨2017-2030年中巴经济走廊计划的可持续性。SWOT分析的混合方法与多标准决策方法相结合,包括最佳最差方法- mV模型(一种线性规划方法),用于分析,权重和排名SWOT标准。对专家进行了调查,以确定与中巴经济走廊可持续性有关的评估标准。结果表明,就“内部实力标准”而言,地缘战略地位是得分最高的标准,而就“内部弱点标准”而言,对中国的依赖程度增加是得分最低的标准。在“内部实力标准”方面,地缘战略地位被确定为最高评分标准,文化友好度被确定为最低评分标准。关于“内部弱点标准”,技术效率低下被认为是最好的,对中国的依赖增加被认为是最差的评分标准。在“外部机会标准”的背景下,增加就业机会和区域连通性是得分最高的标准,相互贸易收益是得分最低的标准。最后,在“外部威胁标准”中,自然资源开发被确定为最佳评分标准。结果强调,有必要在“一带一路”倡议框架内实现伙伴关系多元化,以增强环境友好性和气候适应能力,减少依赖风险,促进公平发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expert perceptions on CPEC sustainability appraisal: SWOT analysis for informed policy decisions
Globally, the pursuit of sustainable development (SD) is of key importance. Sustainability assessments of large-scale infrastructure development projects play a critical role in balancing economic growth with social, environmental, and climate responsibilities. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a key initiative for regional and global economic advancement. It can also serve as a case study for sustainable development practices. This paper presents results from a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to explore the sustainability of the CPEC plan 2017–2030. A mixed method approach of SWOT Analysis integrated with multicriteria decision-making methods, including the Best Worst Method- mV Model (a linear programming method) has been applied to analyze, weight, and rank SWOT criteria. A survey of experts was conducted to scale assessment criteria related to CPEC sustainability. Results highlight that with regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position is the highest scoring criterion, and with regards to “internal weakness criteria”, increased dependency on China is the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal strength criteria”, the geostrategic position was identified as the highest scoring criterion and cultural friendliness as the lowest scoring criterion. With regards to “internal weakness criteria”, technological inefficiencies were identified as the best, and increased dependency on China as the worst scoring criteria. In the context of “external opportunity’s criteria”, increased job opportunities and regional connectivity were the highest scoring criteria, and mutual trade gain was the lowest scoring criterion. Finally, for “external threats criteria”, natural resource exploitation was identified as the best scoring criterion. The results highlight the need to diversify partnerships within the Belt and Road Initiative in order to enhance environmental friendliness, and climate resilience, as well as to reducedependency risks, and foster equitable development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Living labs from a governance perspective: An analysis of the way living labs transform the environmental governance system “Global significant trends and countermeasures pertaining to climate change adaptation: Translating ambition into action post-COP29” From opinion to action: Impact of social networks and information policy on private adaptation to floods Making global environmental assessments fit for future challenges Hydro-transparency and transboundary water governance: Addressing information deficits and asymmetries in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1