平衡供应安全和脱碳:根据欧洲绿色协议优化德国液化天然气港口基础设施

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114484
Per J. Agrell, Henri Dehaybe, Manuel Herrera Rodriguez
{"title":"平衡供应安全和脱碳:根据欧洲绿色协议优化德国液化天然气港口基础设施","authors":"Per J. Agrell,&nbsp;Henri Dehaybe,&nbsp;Manuel Herrera Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Green Deal depends on a coordinated common policy for demand, renewable generation, supply security, and infrastructure. To ensure supply security after 2022 gas supply interruptions, the German government diversified energy imports into liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the use of floating storage and regasification units (FSRU). We test whether the current plan for Germany is consistent with the Green Deal objectives for decarbonization. We use a cost-minimizing facility location model following European policy objectives, combined with a network flow model, to optimize the assignment of FSRUs among German ports to ensure gas supply. Six scenarios are investigated: three greenfield models, with different demand scenarios, in which all locations are possible, a brownfield model in which the existing terminals are imposed, a no-FSRU scenario and a peace scenario between Ukraine and Russia. The optimal solutions for the base greenfield scenarios use the FSRU port infrastructures to expand the regasification capacity to 45 bcm per year. The model validates actual current decisions as optimal for supply security, but the two greenfield and long-term decisions differ in length and investment intensity, challenging policy consistency. Potentially, the impact of anticipatory hydrogen transport investments can distort the analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 114484"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing supply security and decarbonization: Optimizing Germany’s LNG port infrastructure under the European Green Deal\",\"authors\":\"Per J. Agrell,&nbsp;Henri Dehaybe,&nbsp;Manuel Herrera Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The European Green Deal depends on a coordinated common policy for demand, renewable generation, supply security, and infrastructure. To ensure supply security after 2022 gas supply interruptions, the German government diversified energy imports into liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the use of floating storage and regasification units (FSRU). We test whether the current plan for Germany is consistent with the Green Deal objectives for decarbonization. We use a cost-minimizing facility location model following European policy objectives, combined with a network flow model, to optimize the assignment of FSRUs among German ports to ensure gas supply. Six scenarios are investigated: three greenfield models, with different demand scenarios, in which all locations are possible, a brownfield model in which the existing terminals are imposed, a no-FSRU scenario and a peace scenario between Ukraine and Russia. The optimal solutions for the base greenfield scenarios use the FSRU port infrastructures to expand the regasification capacity to 45 bcm per year. The model validates actual current decisions as optimal for supply security, but the two greenfield and long-term decisions differ in length and investment intensity, challenging policy consistency. Potentially, the impact of anticipatory hydrogen transport investments can distort the analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲绿色协议依赖于需求、可再生能源发电、供应安全和基础设施方面的协调一致的共同政策。为了确保2022年天然气供应中断后的供应安全,德国政府通过使用浮动储存和再气化装置(FSRU)将能源进口多样化为液化天然气(LNG)。我们测试德国目前的计划是否与绿色协议的脱碳目标一致。根据欧洲政策目标,我们采用成本最小化的设施选址模型,结合网络流量模型,优化fsru在德国港口之间的分配,以确保天然气供应。研究人员调查了六种情况:三种绿地模式,具有不同的需求情景,其中所有地点都有可能;一种棕地模式,其中现有终端被强制执行;一种无fsru情景以及乌克兰和俄罗斯之间的和平情景。基本绿地方案的最佳解决方案是使用FSRU港口基础设施将再气化能力扩大到每年450亿立方米。该模型验证了实际的当前决策是供应安全的最佳选择,但两个绿地和长期决策在长度和投资强度方面存在差异,这对政策一致性提出了挑战。潜在的,预期氢运输投资的影响可能会扭曲分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing supply security and decarbonization: Optimizing Germany’s LNG port infrastructure under the European Green Deal
The European Green Deal depends on a coordinated common policy for demand, renewable generation, supply security, and infrastructure. To ensure supply security after 2022 gas supply interruptions, the German government diversified energy imports into liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the use of floating storage and regasification units (FSRU). We test whether the current plan for Germany is consistent with the Green Deal objectives for decarbonization. We use a cost-minimizing facility location model following European policy objectives, combined with a network flow model, to optimize the assignment of FSRUs among German ports to ensure gas supply. Six scenarios are investigated: three greenfield models, with different demand scenarios, in which all locations are possible, a brownfield model in which the existing terminals are imposed, a no-FSRU scenario and a peace scenario between Ukraine and Russia. The optimal solutions for the base greenfield scenarios use the FSRU port infrastructures to expand the regasification capacity to 45 bcm per year. The model validates actual current decisions as optimal for supply security, but the two greenfield and long-term decisions differ in length and investment intensity, challenging policy consistency. Potentially, the impact of anticipatory hydrogen transport investments can distort the analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Next level of security of supply: a resilience strategy for the energy transition Evolution and drivers of CO2 and carbon intensity in Malaysia Energy poverty convergence in a fragmented world: Multidimensional evidence from non-OECD countries Green illusions, enduring poverty: How geopolitical fragmentation fuels greenwashing and derails the just energy transition in the global South Green bonds, climate resilience, and environmental performance: A global panel analysis of sustainable finance effectiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1