深度学习方法在不同区域地面臭氧预测中的综合评价

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103024
Guanjun Lin , Hang Zhao , Yufeng Chi
{"title":"深度学习方法在不同区域地面臭氧预测中的综合评价","authors":"Guanjun Lin ,&nbsp;Hang Zhao ,&nbsp;Yufeng Chi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, the issue of near-surface ozone pollution has become a growing concern. To effectively manage and control ozone pollution, emerging deep learning (DL) techniques have been applied for future ozone concentration trend prediction, generating promising outcomes. However, existing studies employ various DL models and rely on diverse datasets to predict ozone concentrations. This leads to a lack of comprehensive evaluations of how the architecture and depth of different DL models influence the predictive accuracy of ozone concentration trends when assessed using a unified dataset. This lack of uniformity in evaluations creates a gap in our understanding of the influence of different neural network architectures and depths on ozone concentration predictions. In this work, we aim to address this research gap by conducting a systematic performance evaluation that benchmarks six prominent DL architectures, each with varying depths, to evaluate their effectiveness for predicting ozone concentrations across diverse geographical regions. Our findings indicate that the best-performing DL model in the nationwide prediction task is the one-layer bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model, which achieves an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of 0.66, an RMSE of 15.32<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>, and an MAE of 11.51<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. In contrast, the poorest-performing model in the same prediction task is the one-block transformer-based model, with an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of 0.57, an RMSE of 17.34<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>, and an MAE of 13.3<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. Furthermore, fully connected networks (FCNs) demonstrate robust and efficient predictive performance across both nationwide and regional prediction tasks. Notably, our study reveals that no single DL model consistently performs well across all prediction tasks, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches that cater to the specific attributes of each region. Additionally, we observe that DL models with more than two hidden layers frequently suffer from overfitting. Particularly for the Bi-LSTM architecture, as the number of hidden layers increases from 1 to 7, we observe a 12% reduction in <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> performance. Our analysis also identifies the most influential meteorological factors among the top-performing DL models, offering insights for feature selection and optimization in model development. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the design and selection of appropriate DL architectures for predicting the concentrations of ozone and other air pollutants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103024"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive evaluation of deep learning approaches for ground-level ozone prediction across different regions\",\"authors\":\"Guanjun Lin ,&nbsp;Hang Zhao ,&nbsp;Yufeng Chi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recently, the issue of near-surface ozone pollution has become a growing concern. To effectively manage and control ozone pollution, emerging deep learning (DL) techniques have been applied for future ozone concentration trend prediction, generating promising outcomes. However, existing studies employ various DL models and rely on diverse datasets to predict ozone concentrations. This leads to a lack of comprehensive evaluations of how the architecture and depth of different DL models influence the predictive accuracy of ozone concentration trends when assessed using a unified dataset. This lack of uniformity in evaluations creates a gap in our understanding of the influence of different neural network architectures and depths on ozone concentration predictions. In this work, we aim to address this research gap by conducting a systematic performance evaluation that benchmarks six prominent DL architectures, each with varying depths, to evaluate their effectiveness for predicting ozone concentrations across diverse geographical regions. Our findings indicate that the best-performing DL model in the nationwide prediction task is the one-layer bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model, which achieves an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of 0.66, an RMSE of 15.32<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>, and an MAE of 11.51<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. In contrast, the poorest-performing model in the same prediction task is the one-block transformer-based model, with an <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> of 0.57, an RMSE of 17.34<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>, and an MAE of 13.3<span><math><mrow><mi>μ</mi><mi>g</mi><mi>⋅</mi><msup><mrow><mi>m</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span>. Furthermore, fully connected networks (FCNs) demonstrate robust and efficient predictive performance across both nationwide and regional prediction tasks. Notably, our study reveals that no single DL model consistently performs well across all prediction tasks, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches that cater to the specific attributes of each region. Additionally, we observe that DL models with more than two hidden layers frequently suffer from overfitting. Particularly for the Bi-LSTM architecture, as the number of hidden layers increases from 1 to 7, we observe a 12% reduction in <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>R</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> performance. Our analysis also identifies the most influential meteorological factors among the top-performing DL models, offering insights for feature selection and optimization in model development. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the design and selection of appropriate DL architectures for predicting the concentrations of ozone and other air pollutants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125000330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125000330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,近地表臭氧污染问题日益引起人们的关注。为了有效地管理和控制臭氧污染,新兴的深度学习(DL)技术已被应用于未来臭氧浓度趋势预测,并取得了可喜的成果。然而,现有的研究采用了各种DL模型,并依赖于不同的数据集来预测臭氧浓度。这导致在使用统一数据集评估时,缺乏对不同DL模型的架构和深度如何影响臭氧浓度趋势预测精度的综合评估。这种评估缺乏一致性造成了我们对不同神经网络结构和深度对臭氧浓度预测的影响的理解上的差距。在这项工作中,我们的目标是通过进行系统的性能评估来解决这一研究差距,该评估对六个突出的DL架构进行了基准测试,每个架构都具有不同的深度,以评估它们在预测不同地理区域臭氧浓度方面的有效性。结果表明,在全国范围内预测任务中,表现最好的深度学习模型是单层双向长短期记忆(Bi-LSTM)模型,其R2为0.66,RMSE为15.32μ m−3,MAE为11.51μ m−3。在同一预测任务中,表现最差的是基于单块变压器的模型,R2为0.57,RMSE为17.34μ m−3,MAE为13.3μ m−3。此外,全连接网络(fcn)在全国和区域预测任务中都表现出强大而有效的预测性能。值得注意的是,我们的研究表明,没有一个单一的深度学习模型能够在所有预测任务中始终表现良好,这强调了需要针对每个区域的特定属性定制方法。此外,我们观察到具有两个以上隐藏层的深度学习模型经常遭受过拟合。特别是对于Bi-LSTM架构,当隐藏层的数量从1增加到7时,我们观察到R2性能降低了12%。我们的分析还确定了表现最好的深度学习模型中最具影响力的气象因素,为模型开发中的特征选择和优化提供了见解。这项研究有助于更深入地了解用于预测臭氧和其他空气污染物浓度的适当DL架构的设计和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comprehensive evaluation of deep learning approaches for ground-level ozone prediction across different regions
Recently, the issue of near-surface ozone pollution has become a growing concern. To effectively manage and control ozone pollution, emerging deep learning (DL) techniques have been applied for future ozone concentration trend prediction, generating promising outcomes. However, existing studies employ various DL models and rely on diverse datasets to predict ozone concentrations. This leads to a lack of comprehensive evaluations of how the architecture and depth of different DL models influence the predictive accuracy of ozone concentration trends when assessed using a unified dataset. This lack of uniformity in evaluations creates a gap in our understanding of the influence of different neural network architectures and depths on ozone concentration predictions. In this work, we aim to address this research gap by conducting a systematic performance evaluation that benchmarks six prominent DL architectures, each with varying depths, to evaluate their effectiveness for predicting ozone concentrations across diverse geographical regions. Our findings indicate that the best-performing DL model in the nationwide prediction task is the one-layer bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model, which achieves an R2 of 0.66, an RMSE of 15.32μgm3, and an MAE of 11.51μgm3. In contrast, the poorest-performing model in the same prediction task is the one-block transformer-based model, with an R2 of 0.57, an RMSE of 17.34μgm3, and an MAE of 13.3μgm3. Furthermore, fully connected networks (FCNs) demonstrate robust and efficient predictive performance across both nationwide and regional prediction tasks. Notably, our study reveals that no single DL model consistently performs well across all prediction tasks, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches that cater to the specific attributes of each region. Additionally, we observe that DL models with more than two hidden layers frequently suffer from overfitting. Particularly for the Bi-LSTM architecture, as the number of hidden layers increases from 1 to 7, we observe a 12% reduction in R2 performance. Our analysis also identifies the most influential meteorological factors among the top-performing DL models, offering insights for feature selection and optimization in model development. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the design and selection of appropriate DL architectures for predicting the concentrations of ozone and other air pollutants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian source apportionment of sedimentary organic carbon along a sluice-regulated river–estuary continuum: Coupling machine learning, spatial analytics, and multi-proxy geochemistry Sampling method influences zooplankton diversity estimates in humic lakes: A case study with implications for ecological assessment Three-dimensional acoustic-based model for abnormal cough sound localization: A proof-of-concept study in laying hens Integrating heterogeneous user-generated contents into spatial modeling of agricultural landscape recreational services: A geographically weighted random forest approach Niche differences mediate phytoplankton assembly and harmful algal bloom species dynamics across three seasons in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea (2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1