Sverker Sikström , Ieva Valavičiūtė , Petri Kajonius
{"title":"用几个字来描述个性:用自然语言处理进行评估","authors":"Sverker Sikström , Ieva Valavičiūtė , Petri Kajonius","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (<em>N</em> = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality in just a few words: Assessment using natural language processing\",\"authors\":\"Sverker Sikström , Ieva Valavičiūtė , Petri Kajonius\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (<em>N</em> = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Personality in just a few words: Assessment using natural language processing
Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (N = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.