用几个字来描述个性:用自然语言处理进行评估

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113078
Sverker Sikström , Ieva Valavičiūtė , Petri Kajonius
{"title":"用几个字来描述个性:用自然语言处理进行评估","authors":"Sverker Sikström ,&nbsp;Ieva Valavičiūtė ,&nbsp;Petri Kajonius","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (<em>N</em> = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personality in just a few words: Assessment using natural language processing\",\"authors\":\"Sverker Sikström ,&nbsp;Ieva Valavičiūtė ,&nbsp;Petri Kajonius\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (<em>N</em> = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000406\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理构念的评估,如五大人格特征,主要依赖于标准化的评定量表。虽然这些量表具有优势,但我们认为,用自然语言处理(NLP)分析的描述性基于单词的反应为评估人格特征提供了一个有希望的选择。我们要求参与者(N = 663)用五个词来描述他们自己的性格或在五大特征之一上表现突出的人。然后使用大型语言模型(即BERT和GPT-4)对这些反应进行分析,这些模型以其高性能的NLP能力而闻名。主要目的是评估NLP分析的基于文字的反应与IPIP-NEO-30评定量表的有效性,IPIP-NEO-30评定量表是衡量五大特征的常用工具。结果表明,描述性词语反应在分类五大特征方面的平均预测准确率比评定量表高出10%。此外,语义测量显示出更高的评分者间信度,观察者对他人的评估比自我报告更趋同。这些发现表明,与传统的评分量表相比,描述性的基于单词的反应可能捕捉到更多可观察和广泛的个性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personality in just a few words: Assessment using natural language processing
Assessment of psychological constructs, such as the Big Five personality traits, has predominantly relied on standardized rating scales. While these scales have advantages, we propose that descriptive word-based responses analyzed with natural language processing (NLP) offer a promising alternative for assessing personality traits. We asked participants (N = 663) to describe either their own personality or a person high in one of the Big Five traits using five words. These responses were then analyzed using large language models, namely BERT and GPT-4, which are known for their high-performance NLP capabilities. The primary aim was to assess the validity of word-based responses analyzed by NLP in comparison to the IPIP-NEO-30 rating scale, a commonly used tool for measuring the Big Five traits. Results showed that descriptive word responses had an average prediction accuracy of up to 10 % higher than the rating scale in categorizing the Big Five traits. Additionally, semantic measures showed higher inter-rater reliability, and observer convergence was greater in assessments of others than in self-reports. These findings suggest that descriptive word-based responses may capture more observable and broad aspects of personality compared to traditional rating scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Dark Triad traits across sex and sexual orientation: Evidence from Brazil Technical comment on Ručević, S., & Antunović, J. (2026). Behind the mask of love: Associations among dark triad traits, attachment avoidance and anxiety, romantic beliefs, and intimacy expectations. Personality and Individual Differences, 255, 113692 Is the general factor of interests related to acquiescence? Using reverse-worded items to account for response bias From identification with a violent game character to aggression: The role of perceptual sensitivity of emotions, childhood trauma and antisociality domains Step by step: How emotion regulation strategies follow one another
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1