冲突后叙利亚的难民返回、重返社会和公民实践

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY International Migration Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1111/imig.13379
Osman Bahadır Dinçer, Zeynep Şahin-Mencütek
{"title":"冲突后叙利亚的难民返回、重返社会和公民实践","authors":"Osman Bahadır Dinçer,&nbsp;Zeynep Şahin-Mencütek","doi":"10.1111/imig.13379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The return of Syrian refugees and internally displaced persons is occurring despite the absence of economic, political, social, and security infrastructures necessary for a voluntary, safe, and dignified return. Drawing from desk research and interviews conducted with 87 returnees in 2024, this paper explores the interactions between return processes and the Syrian government's citizenship policies. The evidence suggests that the Syrian regime has strategically promoted the right to return and <i>selective readmission</i> of Syrian refugees to gain international legitimacy and facilitate post-war reconstruction. Empirical findings indicate that returnees have not yet attained all citizenship rights, particularly in ensuring safety, accessing government services, participating in cultural and political life, and fostering a sense of belonging. Furthermore, the lack of conducive conditions for the reintegration of returnees, coupled with the persistent characteristics of the pre-war and conflict-era concentric citizenship regime and a lack of political trust, impedes enjoying the rights and protections that should be afforded to them as citizens. This paper contributes to discussions on the politics of repatriation in origin countries and the diverse, path-dependent factors shaping the reintegration of displaced persons in complex post-conflict situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.13379","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refugee return, reintegration, and citizenship practices in post-conflict Syria\",\"authors\":\"Osman Bahadır Dinçer,&nbsp;Zeynep Şahin-Mencütek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imig.13379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The return of Syrian refugees and internally displaced persons is occurring despite the absence of economic, political, social, and security infrastructures necessary for a voluntary, safe, and dignified return. Drawing from desk research and interviews conducted with 87 returnees in 2024, this paper explores the interactions between return processes and the Syrian government's citizenship policies. The evidence suggests that the Syrian regime has strategically promoted the right to return and <i>selective readmission</i> of Syrian refugees to gain international legitimacy and facilitate post-war reconstruction. Empirical findings indicate that returnees have not yet attained all citizenship rights, particularly in ensuring safety, accessing government services, participating in cultural and political life, and fostering a sense of belonging. Furthermore, the lack of conducive conditions for the reintegration of returnees, coupled with the persistent characteristics of the pre-war and conflict-era concentric citizenship regime and a lack of political trust, impedes enjoying the rights and protections that should be afforded to them as citizens. This paper contributes to discussions on the politics of repatriation in origin countries and the diverse, path-dependent factors shaping the reintegration of displaced persons in complex post-conflict situations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Migration\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.13379\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Migration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.13379\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imig.13379","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管缺乏实现自愿、安全和有尊严的返回所必需的经济、政治、社会和安全基础设施,叙利亚难民和国内流离失所者仍在返回。本文通过对2024年87名返回者的调查和访谈,探讨了返回过程与叙利亚政府公民政策之间的相互作用。证据表明,叙利亚政权在战略上促进了叙利亚难民返回和选择性重新接纳的权利,以获得国际合法性并促进战后重建。经验调查结果表明,回返者尚未获得所有公民权利,特别是在确保安全、获得政府服务、参与文化和政治生活以及培养归属感方面。此外,缺乏使回返者重新融入社会的有利条件,加上战前和冲突时期集中公民身份制度的持久特点和缺乏政治信任,妨碍了他们享有作为公民应享有的权利和保护。本文有助于讨论原籍国的遣返政治,以及在复杂的冲突后局势中形成流离失所者重新融入社会的各种路径依赖因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refugee return, reintegration, and citizenship practices in post-conflict Syria

The return of Syrian refugees and internally displaced persons is occurring despite the absence of economic, political, social, and security infrastructures necessary for a voluntary, safe, and dignified return. Drawing from desk research and interviews conducted with 87 returnees in 2024, this paper explores the interactions between return processes and the Syrian government's citizenship policies. The evidence suggests that the Syrian regime has strategically promoted the right to return and selective readmission of Syrian refugees to gain international legitimacy and facilitate post-war reconstruction. Empirical findings indicate that returnees have not yet attained all citizenship rights, particularly in ensuring safety, accessing government services, participating in cultural and political life, and fostering a sense of belonging. Furthermore, the lack of conducive conditions for the reintegration of returnees, coupled with the persistent characteristics of the pre-war and conflict-era concentric citizenship regime and a lack of political trust, impedes enjoying the rights and protections that should be afforded to them as citizens. This paper contributes to discussions on the politics of repatriation in origin countries and the diverse, path-dependent factors shaping the reintegration of displaced persons in complex post-conflict situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: International Migration is a refereed, policy oriented journal on migration issues as analysed by demographers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists from all parts of the world. It covers the entire field of policy relevance in international migration, giving attention not only to a breadth of topics reflective of policy concerns, but also attention to coverage of all regions of the world and to comparative policy.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Immobility: Rethinking Sustainable Return and Mobility Aspirations Among Afghan Returnees Comparing Refugee Integration Experiences in the UK: Community Sponsorship and the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme Selective Institutionalisation and Transnational Moral Economy in the Korea–Central Asia Migration Corridor Working Your Way to Remain: Subjective Well-Being and Employment of Migrants in the United Kingdom Intergenerational Trauma in Refugee Communities. By Laura Kromják and Ajlina Karamehić-Muratović (eds.), London, New York: Routledge, 2025. 286 pp. (hardcover). ISBN: 978-1-03-247378-9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1