热带气旋背景下ERA5再分析的偏差分析与校正

IF 3.4 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1029/2024JD042737
Chunshan Wei, Xiaofeng Zhao, Yudi Liu, Pinglv Yang, Zeming Zhou, Yibin Chen
{"title":"热带气旋背景下ERA5再分析的偏差分析与校正","authors":"Chunshan Wei,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhao,&nbsp;Yudi Liu,&nbsp;Pinglv Yang,&nbsp;Zeming Zhou,&nbsp;Yibin Chen","doi":"10.1029/2024JD042737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A detailed analysis of temperature and relative humidity biases in ERA5 reanalysis under tropical cyclone (TC) conditions is conducted using a composite analysis method based on more than 17,000 dropsonde observations. The statistical results indicate that ERA5 underestimates the warm-core intensity of TCs. It shows a moist bias at the tropopause and a cold-moist bias in the boundary layer beyond four times the radius of maximum winds (RMW). In contrast, within 4 RMW, a warm-dry bias in the boundary layer was observed. The temperature bias is more pronounced at the TC center, and relative humidity exhibits a similar pattern, primarily in the mid and upper troposphere. The bias distribution is asymmetric, most prominent in the right front quadrant of the TC's motion direction. Besides, bias correction is performed using an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model and the biases can be reduced by approximately 60%. The dependence relationships between relative humidity and the influencing factors are investigated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The results indicate that low-level relative humidity increases and instability intensifies in TCs at night. Additionally, the findings suggest that ERA5 may inadequately capture the diurnal variation of relative humidity in TCs. The SHAP analysis also shows that relative humidity tends to be stronger in TC's motion direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias Analysis and Correction of ERA5 Reanalysis in the Context of Tropical Cyclones\",\"authors\":\"Chunshan Wei,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhao,&nbsp;Yudi Liu,&nbsp;Pinglv Yang,&nbsp;Zeming Zhou,&nbsp;Yibin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD042737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A detailed analysis of temperature and relative humidity biases in ERA5 reanalysis under tropical cyclone (TC) conditions is conducted using a composite analysis method based on more than 17,000 dropsonde observations. The statistical results indicate that ERA5 underestimates the warm-core intensity of TCs. It shows a moist bias at the tropopause and a cold-moist bias in the boundary layer beyond four times the radius of maximum winds (RMW). In contrast, within 4 RMW, a warm-dry bias in the boundary layer was observed. The temperature bias is more pronounced at the TC center, and relative humidity exhibits a similar pattern, primarily in the mid and upper troposphere. The bias distribution is asymmetric, most prominent in the right front quadrant of the TC's motion direction. Besides, bias correction is performed using an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model and the biases can be reduced by approximately 60%. The dependence relationships between relative humidity and the influencing factors are investigated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The results indicate that low-level relative humidity increases and instability intensifies in TCs at night. Additionally, the findings suggest that ERA5 may inadequately capture the diurnal variation of relative humidity in TCs. The SHAP analysis also shows that relative humidity tends to be stronger in TC's motion direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042737\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042737","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用基于17000多个落差探测资料的复合分析方法,对热带气旋条件下ERA5再分析中的温度和相对湿度偏差进行了详细分析。统计结果表明,ERA5低估了tc的暖核强度。在对流层顶表现出湿润偏倚,在最大风半径(RMW) 4倍以上的边界层表现出冷湿偏倚。相比之下,在4 RMW内,边界层出现了暖干偏置。温度偏差在TC中心更为明显,相对湿度也表现出类似的模式,主要在对流层中高层。偏压分布不对称,在TC运动方向的右前象限最为突出。此外,使用极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型进行偏差校正,偏差可以减少约60%。利用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值研究了相对湿度与影响因子之间的依赖关系。结果表明:夜间,tc低层相对湿度增加,不稳定性增强。此外,研究结果表明,ERA5可能不能充分捕捉tc相对湿度的日变化。SHAP分析还表明,相对湿度在TC的运动方向上更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bias Analysis and Correction of ERA5 Reanalysis in the Context of Tropical Cyclones

A detailed analysis of temperature and relative humidity biases in ERA5 reanalysis under tropical cyclone (TC) conditions is conducted using a composite analysis method based on more than 17,000 dropsonde observations. The statistical results indicate that ERA5 underestimates the warm-core intensity of TCs. It shows a moist bias at the tropopause and a cold-moist bias in the boundary layer beyond four times the radius of maximum winds (RMW). In contrast, within 4 RMW, a warm-dry bias in the boundary layer was observed. The temperature bias is more pronounced at the TC center, and relative humidity exhibits a similar pattern, primarily in the mid and upper troposphere. The bias distribution is asymmetric, most prominent in the right front quadrant of the TC's motion direction. Besides, bias correction is performed using an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model and the biases can be reduced by approximately 60%. The dependence relationships between relative humidity and the influencing factors are investigated through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The results indicate that low-level relative humidity increases and instability intensifies in TCs at night. Additionally, the findings suggest that ERA5 may inadequately capture the diurnal variation of relative humidity in TCs. The SHAP analysis also shows that relative humidity tends to be stronger in TC's motion direction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Contrail Formation Within Cirrus: Contrail Induced Perturbations and Cirrus Adjustments A Signal-Derived Retrieval Reduces Bias in TEMPO NO2 Extreme Zonal Dipole Pattern of January Blocking Days Between the Eastern North Atlantic and Ural in 2008: The Combined Impact of Sea Surface Temperature and Newly Formed Arctic Sea Ice Anomalies Land Surface Temperature Shows Negligible Difference Between Inside and Outside Photovoltaic Power Plants in China An Integrated Uncertainty Framework for the China-MST 3.0 Global Surface Temperature Data Set
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1