失望厌恶对风险防范的影响

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Managerial and Decision Economics Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/mde.4423
Yongjin Yin, Shengwang Meng
{"title":"失望厌恶对风险防范的影响","authors":"Yongjin Yin,&nbsp;Shengwang Meng","doi":"10.1002/mde.4423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We adopt three of well-established models of disappointment aversion to study the effect of disappointment aversion on risk prevention which involves self-insurance and self-protection. In self-insurance actions, we show that, in general, the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker, and the optimal efforts across these disappointment models are not identical. Moreover, under the <i>Gul model</i>, the disappointment-averse decision maker may exert less effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker in multiple loss states. In self-protection actions, we provide a set of sufficient conditions under which the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort or less effort compared with the standard risk-averse decision maker for each of these disappointment aversion models.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 2","pages":"1108-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Disappointment Aversion on Risk Prevention\",\"authors\":\"Yongjin Yin,&nbsp;Shengwang Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mde.4423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We adopt three of well-established models of disappointment aversion to study the effect of disappointment aversion on risk prevention which involves self-insurance and self-protection. In self-insurance actions, we show that, in general, the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker, and the optimal efforts across these disappointment models are not identical. Moreover, under the <i>Gul model</i>, the disappointment-averse decision maker may exert less effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker in multiple loss states. In self-protection actions, we provide a set of sufficient conditions under which the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort or less effort compared with the standard risk-averse decision maker for each of these disappointment aversion models.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"1108-1124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial and Decision Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4423\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用三个成熟的失望厌恶模型,研究了失望厌恶对自我保险和自我保护风险预防的影响。在自我保险行为中,我们表明,一般来说,失望厌恶的决策者会比标准风险厌恶的决策者付出更多的努力,并且在这些失望模型中的最优努力是不相同的。此外,在Gul模型下,在多种损失状态下,失望厌恶型决策者可能比标准风险厌恶型决策者付出更少的努力。在自我保护行为中,我们提供了一组充分条件,在这些条件下,失望厌恶的决策者会比标准风险厌恶的决策者付出更多的努力或更少的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Disappointment Aversion on Risk Prevention

We adopt three of well-established models of disappointment aversion to study the effect of disappointment aversion on risk prevention which involves self-insurance and self-protection. In self-insurance actions, we show that, in general, the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker, and the optimal efforts across these disappointment models are not identical. Moreover, under the Gul model, the disappointment-averse decision maker may exert less effort than the standard risk-averse decision maker in multiple loss states. In self-protection actions, we provide a set of sufficient conditions under which the disappointment-averse decision maker will exert more effort or less effort compared with the standard risk-averse decision maker for each of these disappointment aversion models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Industrial Agglomeration, Agglomeration Externalities and Enterprise Energy Intensity—An Analysis Based on Upstream and Downstream Industry Linkages Tech-Savvy, Business-Wise: How IT-Oriented Executives Drive AI Adoption Cause Marketing Decisions With Consumer Prosocial Preference and Asymmetric Competition The “Halo” of Financial Innovation: Financial Technology and Total Factor Productivity Growth in Chinese Energy Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1