基于随机森林方法的卫星光学和微波植被指数估算火灾数量和辐射功率

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1029/2024JD041680
Jiawei Duan, Jiheng Hu, Yuyun Fu, Qingyang Liu, Rui Li, Yipu Wang
{"title":"基于随机森林方法的卫星光学和微波植被指数估算火灾数量和辐射功率","authors":"Jiawei Duan,&nbsp;Jiheng Hu,&nbsp;Yuyun Fu,&nbsp;Qingyang Liu,&nbsp;Rui Li,&nbsp;Yipu Wang","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The satellite microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) has been used in previous studies to estimate FCs and FRP using traditional multivariate linear regression models. However, the nonlinear effects and contributions of numerous factors that affect forest fires cannot be disentangled by this model. Using the random forest (RF) model, this study utilized multiple EDVIs and the optical normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as key fuel properties to resolve the physical driving mechanisms of forest fires and to estimate the daily FCs and FRP over East Asia. The results showed that the estimated FCs and FRP were in good agreement with satellite observations, with a spatial R of 0.59 for FCs and 0.63 for FRP and a temporal R of 0.80 for FCs and 0.81 for FRP. The integration of EDVIs and NDVI into the RF model was found to improve model performance and generate overall lower systematic errors than the model without vegetation variables. Model performance was better than that in previous studies using multivariate linear regression models. In addition, EDVIs showed greater importance than NDVI. This was largely due to their daily temporal resolution that allowed EDVIs to capture forest fire dynamics in time. The combination of the RF model with satellite microwave and optical observations shows good performance and has great potential for FC and FRP estimations in global fire danger assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Fire Counts and Fire Radiative Power Using Satellite Optical and Microwave Vegetation Indices With Random Forest Method\",\"authors\":\"Jiawei Duan,&nbsp;Jiheng Hu,&nbsp;Yuyun Fu,&nbsp;Qingyang Liu,&nbsp;Rui Li,&nbsp;Yipu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JD041680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The satellite microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) has been used in previous studies to estimate FCs and FRP using traditional multivariate linear regression models. However, the nonlinear effects and contributions of numerous factors that affect forest fires cannot be disentangled by this model. Using the random forest (RF) model, this study utilized multiple EDVIs and the optical normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as key fuel properties to resolve the physical driving mechanisms of forest fires and to estimate the daily FCs and FRP over East Asia. The results showed that the estimated FCs and FRP were in good agreement with satellite observations, with a spatial R of 0.59 for FCs and 0.63 for FRP and a temporal R of 0.80 for FCs and 0.81 for FRP. The integration of EDVIs and NDVI into the RF model was found to improve model performance and generate overall lower systematic errors than the model without vegetation variables. Model performance was better than that in previous studies using multivariate linear regression models. In addition, EDVIs showed greater importance than NDVI. This was largely due to their daily temporal resolution that allowed EDVIs to capture forest fire dynamics in time. The combination of the RF model with satellite microwave and optical observations shows good performance and has great potential for FC and FRP estimations in global fire danger assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041680\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫星微波发射率差异植被指数(EDVI)在传统的多元线性回归模型中用于估算植被覆盖度和植被覆盖度。然而,影响森林火灾的众多因素的非线性效应和贡献不能通过该模型来解开。本研究利用随机森林(RF)模型,利用多个EDVIs和光学归一化植被指数(NDVI)作为关键的燃料特性来解决森林火灾的物理驱动机制,并估计东亚地区的每日FCs和FRP。结果表明,FCs和FRP的空间R值分别为0.59和0.63,FCs和FRP的时间R值分别为0.80和0.81,与卫星观测值吻合良好。将EDVIs和NDVI整合到RF模型中可以提高模型的性能,并且产生的总体系统误差低于不含植被变量的模型。模型性能优于以往使用多元线性回归模型的研究。此外,EDVIs比NDVI更重要。这主要是由于它们的日常时间分辨率使EDVIs能够及时捕获森林火灾动态。射频模型与卫星微波和光学观测的结合显示出良好的性能,并在全球火灾危险评估中具有很大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of Fire Counts and Fire Radiative Power Using Satellite Optical and Microwave Vegetation Indices With Random Forest Method

The satellite microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI) has been used in previous studies to estimate FCs and FRP using traditional multivariate linear regression models. However, the nonlinear effects and contributions of numerous factors that affect forest fires cannot be disentangled by this model. Using the random forest (RF) model, this study utilized multiple EDVIs and the optical normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as key fuel properties to resolve the physical driving mechanisms of forest fires and to estimate the daily FCs and FRP over East Asia. The results showed that the estimated FCs and FRP were in good agreement with satellite observations, with a spatial R of 0.59 for FCs and 0.63 for FRP and a temporal R of 0.80 for FCs and 0.81 for FRP. The integration of EDVIs and NDVI into the RF model was found to improve model performance and generate overall lower systematic errors than the model without vegetation variables. Model performance was better than that in previous studies using multivariate linear regression models. In addition, EDVIs showed greater importance than NDVI. This was largely due to their daily temporal resolution that allowed EDVIs to capture forest fire dynamics in time. The combination of the RF model with satellite microwave and optical observations shows good performance and has great potential for FC and FRP estimations in global fire danger assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
期刊最新文献
Multiscale Dynamic Mechanisms of Drought-Flood Abrupt Alternation Events in the Yangtze River Basin Stratospheric Intrusions Over Hong Kong: Key Dynamical Mechanisms in Summer A New Vegetation Health Index Based on Vegetation Optical Depth: Development and Application in Vegetated Australia Added Value of Three-Dimensional Planetary Boundary Layer Schemes for Simulating Local-Scale Circulations Over Complex Terrain on the Tibetan Plateau Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1