致幻剂和精神病:量化风险

Lawrence H. Price M.D.
{"title":"致幻剂和精神病:量化风险","authors":"Lawrence H. Price M.D.","doi":"10.1002/pu.31278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Just over a year ago, I somewhat reluctantly weighed in on the implications for psychiatry of the resurgent interest in psychedelic drugs (Price, 2024). In contrast to the “psychedelic era” of the 1960s and 1970s, this time public interest in these compounds has been accompanied by skillful politico-legal advocacy and systematic research. Both of those endeavors require high levels of funding, and both private philanthropic and for-profit pharmaceutical entities have, for better or worse, stepped in.</p>","PeriodicalId":22275,"journal":{"name":"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update","volume":"36 3","pages":"7-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychedelics and psychosis: Quantifying the risk\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence H. Price M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pu.31278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Just over a year ago, I somewhat reluctantly weighed in on the implications for psychiatry of the resurgent interest in psychedelic drugs (Price, 2024). In contrast to the “psychedelic era” of the 1960s and 1970s, this time public interest in these compounds has been accompanied by skillful politico-legal advocacy and systematic research. Both of those endeavors require high levels of funding, and both private philanthropic and for-profit pharmaceutical entities have, for better or worse, stepped in.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"7-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pu.31278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Brown University Psychopharmacology Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pu.31278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就在一年多以前,我有点不情愿地权衡了对致幻剂兴趣的复苏对精神病学的影响(Price, 2024)。与20世纪60年代和70年代的“迷幻时代”相比,这一次公众对这些化合物的兴趣伴随着熟练的政治法律倡导和系统的研究。这两项努力都需要高水平的资金,无论是私人慈善机构还是营利性制药实体,无论好坏,都参与了进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychedelics and psychosis: Quantifying the risk

Just over a year ago, I somewhat reluctantly weighed in on the implications for psychiatry of the resurgent interest in psychedelic drugs (Price, 2024). In contrast to the “psychedelic era” of the 1960s and 1970s, this time public interest in these compounds has been accompanied by skillful politico-legal advocacy and systematic research. Both of those endeavors require high levels of funding, and both private philanthropic and for-profit pharmaceutical entities have, for better or worse, stepped in.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study shows less prescribing of stimulants in young people with comorbid ADHD and SUD Psilocybin shows mixed results for patients with treatment-resistant depression The psychiatric benefits of cannabinoids: scarcity of evidence Impact of maternal acetaminophen use on child neurodevelopment Clozapine shows benefit in first-episode psychosis after one failed trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1