肩关节置换术中的陶瓷肱骨头:系统回顾

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.024
Chandler S. Harris BSE , Saad M. Ibrahim BS , Clay A. Rahaman BS , Aaron J. Casp MD , Thomas B. Evely DO , Amit M. Momaya MD , Eugene W. Brabston MD
{"title":"肩关节置换术中的陶瓷肱骨头:系统回顾","authors":"Chandler S. Harris BSE ,&nbsp;Saad M. Ibrahim BS ,&nbsp;Clay A. Rahaman BS ,&nbsp;Aaron J. Casp MD ,&nbsp;Thomas B. Evely DO ,&nbsp;Amit M. Momaya MD ,&nbsp;Eugene W. Brabston MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty<span><span><span> has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip </span>arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this </span>systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic </span>humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 9","pages":"Pages 2278-2286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ceramic humeral heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Chandler S. Harris BSE ,&nbsp;Saad M. Ibrahim BS ,&nbsp;Clay A. Rahaman BS ,&nbsp;Aaron J. Casp MD ,&nbsp;Thomas B. Evely DO ,&nbsp;Amit M. Momaya MD ,&nbsp;Eugene W. Brabston MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty<span><span><span> has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip </span>arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this </span>systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic </span>humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2278-2286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625000989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625000989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:全肩关节置换术用于治疗盂肱关节炎已有50多年的历史。近年来,一个创新领域是陶瓷承载表面的使用。陶瓷承载表面的优点包括在无柄植入物和半关节置换术中的应用,与金属植入物相比,它们在髋关节置换术中的应用已被证明可以减少磨损率,并可能降低翻修率。随着人们对陶瓷用于其他关节置换术适应症的兴趣不断增加,本系统综述的目的是巩固近期有关陶瓷承载表面的临床发现,以确定其在解剖性肩关节置换术中的适用性。方法:根据PRISMA指南检索截至2024年4月的Medline、Embase和Cochrane Library。分析的指标包括患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)、术后并发症和影像学结果。次要结局包括前屈、外旋和外展。结果:8项研究纳入716例患者,平均随访57.3个月(范围24-70.7)。研究人群的平均年龄为67.7岁。所有8项研究均纳入了采用陶瓷肱骨头植入物进行肩关节置换术的队列。所有的研究都显示,在术后和患者初次手术后2年内,患者的活动范围和预后评分均有显著改善。患者满意度同样是积极的,97%的患者报告满意的结果。影像学上,6项研究报告Lazarus评分为0级,其中71.9%(213/296)为0级,23.3%(69/296)为1级,3.7%(11/296)为2级,0.67%(2/296)为3级。一项研究报告了一名5级拉撒路患者,仅占观察人群的0.34%(1/296)。结论:在多次随访中,陶瓷表面解剖肩关节置换术显示出安全性和有效性,并发症发生率接近金属假体的历史对照组。未来应该进行随机对照试验,以调查与钛和钴铬合金肱骨头相比的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ceramic humeral heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Hypothesis

Total shoulder arthroplasty has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.

Results

Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.

Conclusion

Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement for primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty: an updated analysis Predictors for outlier results after radial head replacement for acute complex elbow instability Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the Tornier Perform implant with lower trapezius transfer for symptomatic rotator cuff deficiency with external rotation lag and Hornblower's sign Prevalence and risk factors associated with anterior shoulder pain following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Postoperative scapular neck length is associated with strength and rotational range of motion following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the Arthrex Univers Revers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1