Chandler S. Harris BSE , Saad M. Ibrahim BS , Clay A. Rahaman BS , Aaron J. Casp MD , Thomas B. Evely DO , Amit M. Momaya MD , Eugene W. Brabston MD
{"title":"肩关节置换术中的陶瓷肱骨头:系统回顾","authors":"Chandler S. Harris BSE , Saad M. Ibrahim BS , Clay A. Rahaman BS , Aaron J. Casp MD , Thomas B. Evely DO , Amit M. Momaya MD , Eugene W. Brabston MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty<span><span><span> has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip </span>arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this </span>systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic </span>humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":"34 9","pages":"Pages 2278-2286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ceramic humeral heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Chandler S. Harris BSE , Saad M. Ibrahim BS , Clay A. Rahaman BS , Aaron J. Casp MD , Thomas B. Evely DO , Amit M. Momaya MD , Eugene W. Brabston MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><div>Total shoulder arthroplasty<span><span><span> has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip </span>arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this </span>systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic </span>humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2278-2286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625000989\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274625000989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ceramic humeral heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
Hypothesis
Total shoulder arthroplasty has been used for over 50 years to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In recent years, one area of innovation has been the use of ceramic-bearing surfaces. The advantages of ceramic bearing surfaces include utility in stemless implants and hemiarthroplasty, where their use in hip arthroplasty has been shown to decrease wear rates compared to metal implants and potentially reduced revision rates. With interest in utilizing ceramics for other arthroplasty indications continuing to grow, the purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate recent clinical findings involving ceramic-bearing surfaces to determine their suitability for anatomic shoulder replacement.
Methods
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2024 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Metrics analyzed include patient-reported outcome measures, postoperative complications, and radiographic findings. Secondary outcomes included forward flexion, external rotation, and abduction.
Results
Eight studies comparing 716 patients were included with an average follow-up of 57.3 months (range 24-70.7). The mean age for the study population was 67.7 year old. All 8 studies included cohorts that had undergone shoulder arthroplasty with an implant with a ceramic humeral head component. All studies showed significant improvement in range of motion and patient outcome scores both postoperatively and up to 2 years after the patient's initial operation. Patient satisfaction was similarly positive, with 97% of patients reporting satisfactory results. Radiographically, 6 studies reported Lazarus grades with 71.9% (213/296) were grade 0, 23.3% (69/296) were grade 1, 3.7% (11/296) were grade 2, and 0.67% (2/296) demonstrated a grade 3 Lazarus score. One study presented a patient with a grade 5 Lazarus, making up only 0.34% (1/296) of the observed population.
Conclusion
Anatomic shoulder replacements using ceramic-bearing surfaces show safety and efficacy at numerous follow-up intervals, with complication rates approaching those of historical controls with metal implants. Future randomized controlled trials should be performed to investigate potential advantages compared to titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy humeral heads.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.