延长潜伏期真的能提高茶包指数作为土壤健康指标的准确性吗?

IF 5.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Applied Soil Ecology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105837
Taiki Mori
{"title":"延长潜伏期真的能提高茶包指数作为土壤健康指标的准确性吗?","authors":"Taiki Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant <em>k</em> and the stabilization factor <em>S</em>. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105837"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does extending the incubation period really improve the accuracy of the Tea Bag Index as a measure of soil health?\",\"authors\":\"Taiki Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant <em>k</em> and the stabilization factor <em>S</em>. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324005687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324005687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

茶包指数法(Tea Bag Index, TBI)是确定分解常数k和稳定因子s两个关键指标的一种简化方法,近年来在土壤健康评价领域得到越来越多的应用。Hayes等人(2024)提出延长潜伏期可以提高TBI方法的准确性。然而,这一建议具有误导性,事实证明,较长的潜伏期导致分解曲线与观测数据的较大偏差。Hayes等人(2024)还引入了一种新的度量,称为“生物分解”,它代表绿茶和路易波士茶的简单质量损失率。他们建议使用这个指标来代替计算TBI。虽然我完全同意他们关于避免使用TBI的建议,但这一建议的基本原理不应该依赖于Hayes等人(2024)提出的推理。相反,对TBI指标的回避应归因于由于有偏见的假设而导致的基本不准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does extending the incubation period really improve the accuracy of the Tea Bag Index as a measure of soil health?
The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant k and the stabilization factor S. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing vineyard soil mycorrhizal properties and grape and wine phenolic profiles through microbial inoculation and interrow green cover Treated wastewater irrigation reshapes rhizosphere microbial communities through salinity-driven soil changes Which soil health indicators best track diversification benefits in tropical agroecosystems? Rhizosphere prokaryotic microbiota of aquaponic systems (Oreochromis niloticus-Solanum lycopersicum L.) comprises bacterial and archaeal lineages involved in nitrogen metabolism Fungal-mediated microbial carbon pump drives synergistic carbon sequestration in reclaimed soils amended with humic acid and straw
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1