{"title":"延长潜伏期真的能提高茶包指数作为土壤健康指标的准确性吗?","authors":"Taiki Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant <em>k</em> and the stabilization factor <em>S</em>. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 105837"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does extending the incubation period really improve the accuracy of the Tea Bag Index as a measure of soil health?\",\"authors\":\"Taiki Mori\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant <em>k</em> and the stabilization factor <em>S</em>. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105837\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Soil Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324005687\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139324005687","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
茶包指数法(Tea Bag Index, TBI)是确定分解常数k和稳定因子s两个关键指标的一种简化方法,近年来在土壤健康评价领域得到越来越多的应用。Hayes等人(2024)提出延长潜伏期可以提高TBI方法的准确性。然而,这一建议具有误导性,事实证明,较长的潜伏期导致分解曲线与观测数据的较大偏差。Hayes等人(2024)还引入了一种新的度量,称为“生物分解”,它代表绿茶和路易波士茶的简单质量损失率。他们建议使用这个指标来代替计算TBI。虽然我完全同意他们关于避免使用TBI的建议,但这一建议的基本原理不应该依赖于Hayes等人(2024)提出的推理。相反,对TBI指标的回避应归因于由于有偏见的假设而导致的基本不准确性。
Does extending the incubation period really improve the accuracy of the Tea Bag Index as a measure of soil health?
The Tea Bag Index (TBI) approach was proposed as a simplified method for determining two key indices: the decomposition constant k and the stabilization factor S. In recent years, this method has gained increasing popularity within the field of soil health assessment. Hayes et al. (2024) proposed that extending the incubation period could enhance the accuracy of the TBI approach. However, this recommendation is misleading, as evidenced by the fact that the extended incubation period resulted in greater deviation of the decomposition curves from the observed data. Hayes et al. (2024) also introduced a new metric, termed “biological decomposition,” which represents the simple mass loss ratios of both green and rooibos teas. They suggested to use this metric instead of calculating the TBI. While I fully agree with their recommendation to avoid using the TBI, the rationale for this recommendation should not rely on the reasoning presented by Hayes et al. (2024). Instead, the avoidance of the TBI metrics should be attributed to their fundamental inaccuracy due to biased assumptions.
期刊介绍:
Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.