揭开阴影:通过石油暴力和绿色殖民主义的镜头重新评估能源安全

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103951
Yiming Mao
{"title":"揭开阴影:通过石油暴力和绿色殖民主义的镜头重新评估能源安全","authors":"Yiming Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper offers a critical re-examination of these intertwined phenomena using a political ecology framework, challenging conventional energy security paradigms. By integrating case studies from Kenya, Morocco, and Nigeria, the study explores how both fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors contribute to socio-political and environmental injustices. Through this lens, the paper reveals the limitations of state-centric and market-driven models and advocates for a paradigm shift towards an inclusive energy security framework. This redefined framework emphasises sustainability, equity, and global cooperation, urging policymakers to reconsider energy governance structures that perpetuate these injustices. The study's findings highlight the need for policies that incorporate just transitions and energy justice, ensuring that energy transitions do not replicate the exploitative practices of the past. Ultimately, this research calls for a more equitable and sustainable global energy landscape, where the benefits and burdens of energy development are distributed more fairly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103951"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the shadows: Reassessing energy security through the lens of petro-violence and green colonialism\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper offers a critical re-examination of these intertwined phenomena using a political ecology framework, challenging conventional energy security paradigms. By integrating case studies from Kenya, Morocco, and Nigeria, the study explores how both fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors contribute to socio-political and environmental injustices. Through this lens, the paper reveals the limitations of state-centric and market-driven models and advocates for a paradigm shift towards an inclusive energy security framework. This redefined framework emphasises sustainability, equity, and global cooperation, urging policymakers to reconsider energy governance structures that perpetuate these injustices. The study's findings highlight the need for policies that incorporate just transitions and energy justice, ensuring that energy transitions do not replicate the exploitative practices of the past. Ultimately, this research calls for a more equitable and sustainable global energy landscape, where the benefits and burdens of energy development are distributed more fairly.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文使用政治生态学框架对这些相互交织的现象进行了批判性的重新审视,挑战了传统的能源安全范式。通过整合来自肯尼亚、摩洛哥和尼日利亚的案例研究,该研究探讨了化石燃料和可再生能源部门如何导致社会政治和环境不公正。通过这一视角,本文揭示了以国家为中心和市场驱动模式的局限性,并倡导向包容性能源安全框架转变范式。这一重新定义的框架强调可持续性、公平性和全球合作,敦促政策制定者重新考虑使这些不公正现象永久化的能源治理结构。研究结果强调,需要制定政策,将公平转型和能源正义结合起来,确保能源转型不会重复过去的剥削做法。最终,这项研究呼吁建立一个更加公平和可持续的全球能源格局,更公平地分配能源发展的利益和负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling the shadows: Reassessing energy security through the lens of petro-violence and green colonialism
This paper offers a critical re-examination of these intertwined phenomena using a political ecology framework, challenging conventional energy security paradigms. By integrating case studies from Kenya, Morocco, and Nigeria, the study explores how both fossil fuel and renewable energy sectors contribute to socio-political and environmental injustices. Through this lens, the paper reveals the limitations of state-centric and market-driven models and advocates for a paradigm shift towards an inclusive energy security framework. This redefined framework emphasises sustainability, equity, and global cooperation, urging policymakers to reconsider energy governance structures that perpetuate these injustices. The study's findings highlight the need for policies that incorporate just transitions and energy justice, ensuring that energy transitions do not replicate the exploitative practices of the past. Ultimately, this research calls for a more equitable and sustainable global energy landscape, where the benefits and burdens of energy development are distributed more fairly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Private sector agency in low-carbon transitions: Rethinking energy security through hybrid governance in the Global South Infrastructure failures and aging populations: Quantifying the spatial overlap of power outages and older adult vulnerability The efficiency divide: Housing constraints on energy-saving practices in Darwin, Australia From anti-reflexive politicization to anti-reflexive policies: The emergence of renewable exclusion zones in United States environmental policy Towards a common intervention framework: A taxonomy of theory and techniques for digital energy behaviour change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1