谁在节约能源,为什么?分析27个欧洲国家的不同行为

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103922
John Eakins , Bernadette Power , Geraldine Ryan , Helena Strömberg , Lisa Diamond
{"title":"谁在节约能源,为什么?分析27个欧洲国家的不同行为","authors":"John Eakins ,&nbsp;Bernadette Power ,&nbsp;Geraldine Ryan ,&nbsp;Helena Strömberg ,&nbsp;Lisa Diamond","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the decision to undertake a range of energy saving actions using individual survey data. Responses to eleven different energy saving actions are examined. These actions are also grouped together under broader curtailment, efficiency and transport categories for additional insights. The final sample comprises over 20,000 responses from a Eurobarometer survey dataset across 27 European countries. Quantitative multivariate modelling is employed to examine the factors that shape the stated conservation choices. The results highlight the heterogeneity of the underlying socio-demographic and attitudinal effects. Age, gender, household composition, occupation, standard of living, accommodation status and location all influence the energy saving choice, but the effects are varied. For example, there is evidence that age has a non-linear effect which takes different forms for each energy saving action examined. The presence of children has counterbalancing effects, increasing the probability of efficiency actions, but decreasing the probability of curtailment actions. Improvements in standards of living have a positive effect on efficiency actions predominantly. In contrast, having expectations that prices will increase into the future has a positive effect on curtailment actions but a negative effect on efficiency actions. The heterogeneity in the pattern of responses highlight why energy conservation policies need a flexible approach. A one size fits all strategy is unlikely to provide enough scope to incentivise higher levels of engagement across all energy saving profile groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103922"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who saves energy and why? Analysing diverse behaviours in 27 European countries\",\"authors\":\"John Eakins ,&nbsp;Bernadette Power ,&nbsp;Geraldine Ryan ,&nbsp;Helena Strömberg ,&nbsp;Lisa Diamond\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper investigates the decision to undertake a range of energy saving actions using individual survey data. Responses to eleven different energy saving actions are examined. These actions are also grouped together under broader curtailment, efficiency and transport categories for additional insights. The final sample comprises over 20,000 responses from a Eurobarometer survey dataset across 27 European countries. Quantitative multivariate modelling is employed to examine the factors that shape the stated conservation choices. The results highlight the heterogeneity of the underlying socio-demographic and attitudinal effects. Age, gender, household composition, occupation, standard of living, accommodation status and location all influence the energy saving choice, but the effects are varied. For example, there is evidence that age has a non-linear effect which takes different forms for each energy saving action examined. The presence of children has counterbalancing effects, increasing the probability of efficiency actions, but decreasing the probability of curtailment actions. Improvements in standards of living have a positive effect on efficiency actions predominantly. In contrast, having expectations that prices will increase into the future has a positive effect on curtailment actions but a negative effect on efficiency actions. The heterogeneity in the pattern of responses highlight why energy conservation policies need a flexible approach. A one size fits all strategy is unlikely to provide enough scope to incentivise higher levels of engagement across all energy saving profile groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000039\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文利用个人调查数据调查了采取一系列节能行动的决定。对11种不同的节能措施的反应进行了研究。这些行动也被归类在更广泛的削减、效率和运输类别下,以获得更多的见解。最终样本包括来自27个欧洲国家的欧洲晴雨表调查数据集的2万多份回复。定量的多变量模型被用来检查塑造既定的保护选择的因素。结果突出了潜在的社会人口和态度影响的异质性。年龄、性别、家庭构成、职业、生活水平、居住状况、地理位置等因素都会影响居民的节能选择,但影响程度各不相同。例如,有证据表明,年龄具有非线性影响,对每一项被检查的节能行动都采取不同的形式。儿童的存在具有平衡作用,增加了效率行动的可能性,但降低了削减行动的可能性。生活水平的提高主要对效率行动有积极影响。相比之下,对未来价格将上涨的预期对削减行动有积极影响,但对效率行动有消极影响。响应模式的异质性突出了为什么节能政策需要采取灵活的方法。一个放之四海而皆准的策略不太可能提供足够的空间来激励所有节能群体更高层次的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who saves energy and why? Analysing diverse behaviours in 27 European countries
This paper investigates the decision to undertake a range of energy saving actions using individual survey data. Responses to eleven different energy saving actions are examined. These actions are also grouped together under broader curtailment, efficiency and transport categories for additional insights. The final sample comprises over 20,000 responses from a Eurobarometer survey dataset across 27 European countries. Quantitative multivariate modelling is employed to examine the factors that shape the stated conservation choices. The results highlight the heterogeneity of the underlying socio-demographic and attitudinal effects. Age, gender, household composition, occupation, standard of living, accommodation status and location all influence the energy saving choice, but the effects are varied. For example, there is evidence that age has a non-linear effect which takes different forms for each energy saving action examined. The presence of children has counterbalancing effects, increasing the probability of efficiency actions, but decreasing the probability of curtailment actions. Improvements in standards of living have a positive effect on efficiency actions predominantly. In contrast, having expectations that prices will increase into the future has a positive effect on curtailment actions but a negative effect on efficiency actions. The heterogeneity in the pattern of responses highlight why energy conservation policies need a flexible approach. A one size fits all strategy is unlikely to provide enough scope to incentivise higher levels of engagement across all energy saving profile groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Decommodified energy: An anticapitalist energy justice agenda Energy justice and citizens' willingness to participate: A discrete choice experiment in a Mexico-United States cross-border region Beyond the soviet legacy: Energopolitics, extractivism, and a durable carbon lock-in in Azerbaijan Navigating heating choices under energy and financial constraints: Evidence from subsidized housing in Ohio From moral motivations to material interests: Building a mass climate movement through transformative adaptation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1