中国的崛起,公众舆论,以及对南美电力行业日益增长的干预

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2025.103927
Ariel.A. Casarin , Angel Saz-Carranza
{"title":"中国的崛起,公众舆论,以及对南美电力行业日益增长的干预","authors":"Ariel.A. Casarin ,&nbsp;Angel Saz-Carranza","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's ascent as an economic powerhouse has sparked debates over the effectiveness of dirigisme versus liberalization in key economic sectors. We study whether the modest progress in and reversals of neoliberal reforms in South America's electricity markets can be connected to China's rise as a global actor and its unique form of state capitalism. We propose that countries in which public opinion favored China over the United States were more likely to tilt from regulatory to state capitalism in governing their electricity sectors. We find robust support that increased favorable public opinion of China vis-a-vis the United States precedes the reversal of neoliberal reforms in electricity markets, shifting energy policy in those countries towards increasing interventionism. We demonstrate that the public does not need to hold specific opinions about a sector's governance to influence it. Public opinion, shaped by a role model exemplifying a particular form of capitalism, can impact the governance structure of strategic industries, such as the electricity sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103927"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China's rise, public opinion, and growing interventionism in South America's electricity industry\",\"authors\":\"Ariel.A. Casarin ,&nbsp;Angel Saz-Carranza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's ascent as an economic powerhouse has sparked debates over the effectiveness of dirigisme versus liberalization in key economic sectors. We study whether the modest progress in and reversals of neoliberal reforms in South America's electricity markets can be connected to China's rise as a global actor and its unique form of state capitalism. We propose that countries in which public opinion favored China over the United States were more likely to tilt from regulatory to state capitalism in governing their electricity sectors. We find robust support that increased favorable public opinion of China vis-a-vis the United States precedes the reversal of neoliberal reforms in electricity markets, shifting energy policy in those countries towards increasing interventionism. We demonstrate that the public does not need to hold specific opinions about a sector's governance to influence it. Public opinion, shaped by a role model exemplifying a particular form of capitalism, can impact the governance structure of strategic industries, such as the electricity sector.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国作为一个经济强国的崛起引发了关于在关键经济领域实行国家干预与自由化的有效性的争论。我们研究南美电力市场新自由主义改革的温和进展和逆转是否与中国作为全球参与者的崛起及其独特的国家资本主义形式有关。我们认为,在公众舆论支持中国而不是美国的国家,在管理电力部门时更有可能从监管资本主义转向国家资本主义。我们发现,在电力市场新自由主义改革逆转之前,中国相对于美国的有利舆论增加,这些国家的能源政策转向越来越多的干预主义,这是强有力的支持。我们证明,公众不需要对一个部门的治理持有特定的意见来影响它。公众舆论,由一个典型的资本主义的特定形式的榜样塑造,可以影响战略行业的治理结构,如电力部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
China's rise, public opinion, and growing interventionism in South America's electricity industry
China's ascent as an economic powerhouse has sparked debates over the effectiveness of dirigisme versus liberalization in key economic sectors. We study whether the modest progress in and reversals of neoliberal reforms in South America's electricity markets can be connected to China's rise as a global actor and its unique form of state capitalism. We propose that countries in which public opinion favored China over the United States were more likely to tilt from regulatory to state capitalism in governing their electricity sectors. We find robust support that increased favorable public opinion of China vis-a-vis the United States precedes the reversal of neoliberal reforms in electricity markets, shifting energy policy in those countries towards increasing interventionism. We demonstrate that the public does not need to hold specific opinions about a sector's governance to influence it. Public opinion, shaped by a role model exemplifying a particular form of capitalism, can impact the governance structure of strategic industries, such as the electricity sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Operationalizing publicly managed decline: Public asset acquisition in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming Business model viability of Canadian renewable energy communities under regulatory and governance constraints Beyond knowledge-based target group identification: The role of risk perceptions for biofuel risk communication Misinformation and public support across renewable energy technologies in the United States Comfort colonialism, state and regulatory capture and capitalism preventing decarbonisation in the built environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1