{"title":"人机交互如何影响员工的职场拖延症?","authors":"Jia-Min Li, Lan-Xia Zhang, Meng-Yu Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 123951"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does human-AI interaction affect employees' workplace procrastination?\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Min Li, Lan-Xia Zhang, Meng-Yu Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524007492\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524007492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How does human-AI interaction affect employees' workplace procrastination?
Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.
期刊介绍:
Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors.
In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.