人机交互如何影响员工的职场拖延症?

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123951
Jia-Min Li, Lan-Xia Zhang, Meng-Yu Mao
{"title":"人机交互如何影响员工的职场拖延症?","authors":"Jia-Min Li,&nbsp;Lan-Xia Zhang,&nbsp;Meng-Yu Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 123951"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does human-AI interaction affect employees' workplace procrastination?\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Min Li,&nbsp;Lan-Xia Zhang,&nbsp;Meng-Yu Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524007492\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524007492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于资源守恒理论,本研究探讨了人与人工智能交互对员工职场拖延的影响机制,以及无聊感的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用。进行了两项研究来检验假设的模型。在研究1中,人类与人工智能的交互被分为增强和阻碍。增强的人与人工智能交互是员工感知到员工领导工作和人工智能协助工作的程度,而阻碍的人与人工智能交互是员工感知到人工智能领导工作和员工协助工作的程度。我们开发了一个包含八个项目的二维人机交互量表。在研究2中,我们通过收集中国411份问卷的数据来检验我们的假设。这两种类型的人机交互都会显著影响无聊和职场拖延症。无聊介导了这两种类型的人机交互和工作场所拖延症。核心自我评价不仅调节了两种类型的人机交互对无聊的影响,而且调节了无聊的中介作用。本研究对人与人工智能交互的理论认识及其在组织管理中的实际应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How does human-AI interaction affect employees' workplace procrastination?
Based on the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examined the mechanisms by which human-AI interaction influences employees' workplace procrastination and the mediating role of boredom and the moderating role of core self-evaluation. Two studies were conducted to test the hypothesized model. In Study 1, human-AI interactions were categorized into enhanced and impeded. Enhanced human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the employee is leading the work and that the AI assists the work, whereas impeded human-AI interaction is the degree to which the employee perceives that the AI is leading the work and that the employee assists the work. We developed a two-dimensional human-AI interaction scale with eight items. In Study 2, we tested our hypotheses by collecting data from 411 questionnaires in China. Both types of human-AI interaction significantly affected boredom and workplace procrastination. Boredom mediated both types of human-AI interaction and workplace procrastination. Core self-evaluation not only moderated the effects of both types of human-AI interaction on boredom but also moderated the mediating role of boredom. This study has significant implications for both the theoretical understanding of human-AI interaction and its practical applications in organizational management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Smart cities, unequal outcomes: Artificial intelligence, environmental regulation, and urban carbon distribution in China Evaluating and predicting the carbon footprint of training and inference for large-scale AI models in China Regulatory governance and AI innovation quality: A cross-country evaluation of technology, institutions, and ESG outcomes R&D tax credits and subsidies: Implications for innovation novelty in emerging economies Bridging industry and technology: The spatial and sectoral embedded dynamics of green technology diversification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1