官僚激励在环境法规有效性中的作用:来自中国的证据

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Resource and Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101474
Haowei Yu , Guanglai Zhang , Ning Zhang
{"title":"官僚激励在环境法规有效性中的作用:来自中国的证据","authors":"Haowei Yu ,&nbsp;Guanglai Zhang ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Key Cities for Air Pollution Control (KCAPC) program is one of China’s earliest and most important target-based environmental policies, launched in 2002 to address the country’s severe air pollution issue. However, the effectiveness of the program is still largely unknown. This paper examines the impact of the KCAPC program on sulfur dioxide (SO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) emissions, with an emphasis on the role of bureaucratic incentives. We find that the program reduced SO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions by 12.19%–13.84% at the city level and by 11.22%–13.50% at the firm level. We also find that local governments shut down highly polluting firms, promoted greener production and enhanced environmental regulation in order to meet environmental targets set by the program. However, we find that the KCAPC program was only effective in cities where the mayor has a promotion incentive and is not incentivized to collude with polluting firms. Our findings point to the importance of bureaucratic incentives in governing the effectiveness of environmental regulations in localities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of bureaucratic incentives in the effectiveness of environmental regulations: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Haowei Yu ,&nbsp;Guanglai Zhang ,&nbsp;Ning Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2024.101474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Key Cities for Air Pollution Control (KCAPC) program is one of China’s earliest and most important target-based environmental policies, launched in 2002 to address the country’s severe air pollution issue. However, the effectiveness of the program is still largely unknown. This paper examines the impact of the KCAPC program on sulfur dioxide (SO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) emissions, with an emphasis on the role of bureaucratic incentives. We find that the program reduced SO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> emissions by 12.19%–13.84% at the city level and by 11.22%–13.50% at the firm level. We also find that local governments shut down highly polluting firms, promoted greener production and enhanced environmental regulation in order to meet environmental targets set by the program. However, we find that the KCAPC program was only effective in cities where the mayor has a promotion incentive and is not incentivized to collude with polluting firms. Our findings point to the importance of bureaucratic incentives in governing the effectiveness of environmental regulations in localities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765524000502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765524000502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大气污染控制重点城市(KCAPC)计划是中国最早也是最重要的以目标为基础的环境政策之一,于2002年启动,旨在解决该国严重的空气污染问题。然而,该计划的有效性在很大程度上仍然是未知的。本文考察了KCAPC计划对二氧化硫(SO2)排放的影响,重点是官僚激励的作用。我们发现,该计划在城市层面减少了12.19%-13.84%的二氧化硫排放量,在企业层面减少了11.22%-13.50%。我们还发现,地方政府关闭了高污染企业,促进了绿色生产,加强了环境监管,以实现该计划设定的环境目标。然而,我们发现KCAPC计划仅在市长有晋升激励且不鼓励与污染企业勾结的城市有效。我们的研究结果指出了官僚激励在地方环境法规有效性管理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of bureaucratic incentives in the effectiveness of environmental regulations: Evidence from China
The Key Cities for Air Pollution Control (KCAPC) program is one of China’s earliest and most important target-based environmental policies, launched in 2002 to address the country’s severe air pollution issue. However, the effectiveness of the program is still largely unknown. This paper examines the impact of the KCAPC program on sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions, with an emphasis on the role of bureaucratic incentives. We find that the program reduced SO2 emissions by 12.19%–13.84% at the city level and by 11.22%–13.50% at the firm level. We also find that local governments shut down highly polluting firms, promoted greener production and enhanced environmental regulation in order to meet environmental targets set by the program. However, we find that the KCAPC program was only effective in cities where the mayor has a promotion incentive and is not incentivized to collude with polluting firms. Our findings point to the importance of bureaucratic incentives in governing the effectiveness of environmental regulations in localities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
期刊最新文献
Disentangling supply and demand shocks in the EU ETS – Before and after the introduction of the Market Stability Reserve Residential energy efficiency and energy consumption: Why health matters? Aiding recall in self-reported recreation participation: Empirical evidence from seaside trips Incorporating spatial complexity and variability into the design of stated choice experiments for biodiversity policy support Energy technology innovation and decarbonisation: The moderating effect of political corruption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1