考虑不确定经济溢出的高铁工程BOT合同设计

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.018
Yan Liu , Zixin Ji , Kun Wang , Yushi Wang , Yibin Xiao
{"title":"考虑不确定经济溢出的高铁工程BOT合同设计","authors":"Yan Liu ,&nbsp;Zixin Ji ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Yushi Wang ,&nbsp;Yibin Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of high-speed rail (HSR) has had a significant impact on economic development, but it requires substantial investment and places a burden on public funds. The COVID-19 pandemic has further strained government budgets, making alternative funding models attractive. The build-operate-transfer (BOT) model, commonly used in highway projects, involves private companies building and operating infrastructure in exchange for toll revenues. This study explores the use of flexible and fixed BOT contracts for HSR projects and analyzes their impact on private sector investment share and social welfare in HSR projects. Our analytical and numerical simulation findings suggest that under the flexible BOT contract, the private sector investment share increases with the expectation and uncertainty of the economic spillover effect. It decreases with a short HSR infrastructure lifecycle but remains unaffected by a sufficiently long lifecycle. In contrast, a fixed BOT contract raises private sector investment share regardless of the uncertainty of economic spillover. A longer HSR lifecycle amplifies the effect of economic spillover under both types of contracts. Expected social welfare rises with the HSR infrastructure's lifecycle under the fixed BOT contract, but for the flexible BOT contract, it initially increases and then exhibits a jump-down discontinuity at the threshold lifecycle of the HSR infrastructure. The flexible BOT contract outperforms the fixed BOT contract with a shorter lifecycle or higher spillover uncertainty, while the fixed BOT contract yields more welfare improvements for a longer lifecycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"162 ","pages":"Pages 31-46"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BOT contract of high-speed rail project design considering uncertain economic spillover\",\"authors\":\"Yan Liu ,&nbsp;Zixin Ji ,&nbsp;Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Yushi Wang ,&nbsp;Yibin Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.11.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid development of high-speed rail (HSR) has had a significant impact on economic development, but it requires substantial investment and places a burden on public funds. The COVID-19 pandemic has further strained government budgets, making alternative funding models attractive. The build-operate-transfer (BOT) model, commonly used in highway projects, involves private companies building and operating infrastructure in exchange for toll revenues. This study explores the use of flexible and fixed BOT contracts for HSR projects and analyzes their impact on private sector investment share and social welfare in HSR projects. Our analytical and numerical simulation findings suggest that under the flexible BOT contract, the private sector investment share increases with the expectation and uncertainty of the economic spillover effect. It decreases with a short HSR infrastructure lifecycle but remains unaffected by a sufficiently long lifecycle. In contrast, a fixed BOT contract raises private sector investment share regardless of the uncertainty of economic spillover. A longer HSR lifecycle amplifies the effect of economic spillover under both types of contracts. Expected social welfare rises with the HSR infrastructure's lifecycle under the fixed BOT contract, but for the flexible BOT contract, it initially increases and then exhibits a jump-down discontinuity at the threshold lifecycle of the HSR infrastructure. The flexible BOT contract outperforms the fixed BOT contract with a shorter lifecycle or higher spillover uncertainty, while the fixed BOT contract yields more welfare improvements for a longer lifecycle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 31-46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400355X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2400355X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高速铁路(HSR)的快速发展对经济发展产生了重大影响,但它需要大量投资,并给公共资金带来负担。COVID-19大流行进一步紧张了政府预算,使其他融资模式更具吸引力。建设-运营-转让(BOT)模式通常用于高速公路项目,涉及私营公司建设和运营基础设施,以换取通行费收入。本研究探讨了灵活和固定BOT合同在高铁项目中的应用,并分析了它们对高铁项目中私营部门投资份额和社会福利的影响。我们的分析和数值模拟结果表明,在灵活BOT合同下,随着经济溢出效应的预期和不确定性,私营部门投资份额增加。随着高铁基础设施生命周期的缩短,它会减少,但如果生命周期足够长,它不会受到影响。相比之下,无论经济溢出的不确定性如何,固定BOT合同都提高了私营部门投资份额。在这两种契约下,较长的高铁生命周期都会放大经济溢出效应。在固定BOT合同下,期望社会福利随着高铁基础设施的生命周期而增加,而在灵活BOT合同下,期望社会福利在高铁基础设施的生命周期阈值处先增加后呈现跳跃式的不连续。弹性BOT合约在较短的生命周期或较高的溢出不确定性下优于固定BOT合约,而固定BOT合约在较长的生命周期内产生更多的福利改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BOT contract of high-speed rail project design considering uncertain economic spillover
The rapid development of high-speed rail (HSR) has had a significant impact on economic development, but it requires substantial investment and places a burden on public funds. The COVID-19 pandemic has further strained government budgets, making alternative funding models attractive. The build-operate-transfer (BOT) model, commonly used in highway projects, involves private companies building and operating infrastructure in exchange for toll revenues. This study explores the use of flexible and fixed BOT contracts for HSR projects and analyzes their impact on private sector investment share and social welfare in HSR projects. Our analytical and numerical simulation findings suggest that under the flexible BOT contract, the private sector investment share increases with the expectation and uncertainty of the economic spillover effect. It decreases with a short HSR infrastructure lifecycle but remains unaffected by a sufficiently long lifecycle. In contrast, a fixed BOT contract raises private sector investment share regardless of the uncertainty of economic spillover. A longer HSR lifecycle amplifies the effect of economic spillover under both types of contracts. Expected social welfare rises with the HSR infrastructure's lifecycle under the fixed BOT contract, but for the flexible BOT contract, it initially increases and then exhibits a jump-down discontinuity at the threshold lifecycle of the HSR infrastructure. The flexible BOT contract outperforms the fixed BOT contract with a shorter lifecycle or higher spillover uncertainty, while the fixed BOT contract yields more welfare improvements for a longer lifecycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian approach to planning support on two-lane rural roads for automated vehicles: The role of geometric design in disengagement events Funding on the Line? Understanding community preferences for value capture - the case of Melbourne’s Suburban Rail Loop Heterogeneous effects of psychological factors and personality traits on the acceptance of electric micromobility-sharing services in Europe Urban mobility digital twins in transport policy: governance challenges and policy trade-offs Sequential entry in Spanish HSR markets and its effect on prices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1