基于NDEA窗口模型的镍产业供应链安全评价

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105431
Han Sun , Ziyi Yuan , Xiaoxue Wang , Lu Chen , Zhiyun Zha
{"title":"基于NDEA窗口模型的镍产业供应链安全评价","authors":"Han Sun ,&nbsp;Ziyi Yuan ,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Wang ,&nbsp;Lu Chen ,&nbsp;Zhiyun Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105431"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The security evaluation of nickel industrial and supply chains based on the NDEA window model\",\"authors\":\"Han Sun ,&nbsp;Ziyi Yuan ,&nbsp;Xiaoxue Wang ,&nbsp;Lu Chen ,&nbsp;Zhiyun Zha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键矿产已成为大国战略竞争的焦点,确保关键矿产产业链和供应链安全是维护资源安全和经济发展的重要前提。本研究以镍矿产品为研究对象,选取2000年至2021年的8个主要参与国家或地区。基于全产业链视角,构建网络数据包络分析(NDEA)窗口模型,揭示镍矿产业及供应链风险传递的内在机制。从整体和具体两个层面对各国镍产业和供应链的安全水平进行了评估,并对模型的优越性进行了比较和论证。结果表明:(1)澳大利亚、中国、东盟和新喀里多尼亚的安全水平较高,表现出有效的风险抵御能力,而美国、巴西、加拿大和俄罗斯的安全水平较低。(2)从安全水平的波动趋势来看,美国、澳大利亚、加拿大和俄罗斯呈不规则波动下降趋势,其他国家或地区呈相对稳定趋势;(3)通过双视角分析,发现美国、中国等消费大国的上游脆弱性相对较弱,但中下游安全水平较高,上游风险传导导致的安全水平波动较弱。另一方面,东盟、新喀里多尼亚等资源丰富的国家或地区中下游环节较弱,容易受到上游风险传导的影响,中下游安全水平波动较大;(4)通过对比,证实了NDEA窗口模型相对于传统方法更能捕捉到产业和供应链各阶段的相互联系,突出了其在改善安全等级评估偏差方面的优势。本研究结果结合实际情况,为各国关键矿产全产业链发展提供重要参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The security evaluation of nickel industrial and supply chains based on the NDEA window model
Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the evolving landscape of the natural resource curse: A global bibliometric assessment Information flow between rare earth elements-related equities and financial markets: a transfer entropy-based analysis (Rural) Resources and communities: historical pathways of the cement industry in Katana and Kabimba, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo Identifying key natural gas drivers towards China's carbon neutrality through a novel temporal shrinkage framework Structural inertia and market friction in global fossil fuel trade: A longitudinal network analysis of resource path dependencies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1