Han Sun , Ziyi Yuan , Xiaoxue Wang , Lu Chen , Zhiyun Zha
{"title":"基于NDEA窗口模型的镍产业供应链安全评价","authors":"Han Sun , Ziyi Yuan , Xiaoxue Wang , Lu Chen , Zhiyun Zha","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105431"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The security evaluation of nickel industrial and supply chains based on the NDEA window model\",\"authors\":\"Han Sun , Ziyi Yuan , Xiaoxue Wang , Lu Chen , Zhiyun Zha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The security evaluation of nickel industrial and supply chains based on the NDEA window model
Critical minerals have become the focal point of strategic competition among major nations, and ensuring the security of the industrial and supply chain in critical minerals is an essential prerequisite for maintaining resource security and economic development. This study focuses on nickel ore products, selecting eight major participating countries or regions from 2000 to 2021. Based on a whole industrial chain perspective, a Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA) window model is constructed to reveal the inherent mechanisms of risk transmission in the nickel ore industrial and supply chain. The security levels of nickel industrial and supply chains for each country are evaluated from both a holistic and specific level, and the superiority of the model is compared and demonstrated. The results indicate: (1) The security levels of Australia, China, ASEAN, and New Caledonia are relatively high, demonstrating effective resilience against risks, while the security levels of the United States, Brazil, Canada, and Russia are relatively low. (2) Based on the fluctuation trends of security levels, the United States, Australia, Canada, and Russia exhibit irregular fluctuating declining trends, while other countries or regions show relatively stable trends; (3) Through dual-perspective analysis, it is found that upstream vulnerability is relatively weak for consumption powerhouses like the United States and China, but the security levels in the midstream and downstream are relatively high, resulting in weaker fluctuations in security levels caused by upstream risk transmission. On the other hand, resource-rich countries or regions like ASEAN and New Caledonia have weaker midstream and downstream sectors, making them susceptible to the impact of upstream risk transmission, leading to stronger fluctuations in midstream and downstream security levels; (4) Through comparison, it is confirmed that the NDEA window model, relative to traditional methods, better captures the interconnections of various stages in the industrial and supply chain, highlighting its advantages in improving deviations in security level assessments. The results of this study, combined with real-world situations, provide an important reference value for the development of the whole industrial chain of critical minerals in various countries.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.