眼动行为与职业兴趣的关系

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112975
Patricia Malitzke , Constance Richter , Stephan Schwan
{"title":"眼动行为与职业兴趣的关系","authors":"Patricia Malitzke ,&nbsp;Constance Richter ,&nbsp;Stephan Schwan","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The career choice is an important step in life. Popular vocational interest tests aim to adopt a self-reflective and text-based approach. As a result, young adults sometimes choose professions that offer good pay and job security; but their own interests fall by the wayside. Therefore, it is important to optimally support young people in finding a suitable career path. A new approach is the analysis of vocational interests through eye movement behavior. Eyes move involuntarily and deliver results beyond subjective, verbal tests. For this study, German adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 were shown a picture with six professions that correspond to Holland's personality types (RIASEC = Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional). The results revealed that dwell time, fixation count and an image-related evaluation are suitable for determining interests. Not all eye movement data is adequate for measuring vocational interests. Time to first fixation did not show significant correlations. In addition, the visual representation of the RIASEC types must be precise, because the Conventional and Enterprising dimensions are very similar in terms of the working environment. This study thus provides the first foundations for a gaze-based vocational interest test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 112975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between eye movement behavior and vocational interests\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Malitzke ,&nbsp;Constance Richter ,&nbsp;Stephan Schwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The career choice is an important step in life. Popular vocational interest tests aim to adopt a self-reflective and text-based approach. As a result, young adults sometimes choose professions that offer good pay and job security; but their own interests fall by the wayside. Therefore, it is important to optimally support young people in finding a suitable career path. A new approach is the analysis of vocational interests through eye movement behavior. Eyes move involuntarily and deliver results beyond subjective, verbal tests. For this study, German adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 were shown a picture with six professions that correspond to Holland's personality types (RIASEC = Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional). The results revealed that dwell time, fixation count and an image-related evaluation are suitable for determining interests. Not all eye movement data is adequate for measuring vocational interests. Time to first fixation did not show significant correlations. In addition, the visual representation of the RIASEC types must be precise, because the Conventional and Enterprising dimensions are very similar in terms of the working environment. This study thus provides the first foundations for a gaze-based vocational interest test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004355\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业选择是人生中重要的一步。流行的职业兴趣测试旨在采用自我反思和基于文本的方法。因此,年轻人有时会选择薪水高、工作有保障的职业;但他们自己的利益却被抛在了一边。因此,最好地支持年轻人找到合适的职业道路是很重要的。通过眼动行为分析职业兴趣是一种新的研究方法。眼睛不自觉地移动,传递出的结果超越了主观的、口头的测试。在这项研究中,研究人员向年龄在16到19岁之间的德国青少年展示了一张与荷兰人格类型(RIASEC =现实、调查、艺术、社会、进取、传统)相对应的六种职业的照片。结果表明,停留时间、注视次数和图像相关评价适合于确定兴趣。并非所有的眼动数据都足以衡量职业兴趣。第一次注视的时间没有显示出显著的相关性。此外,RIASEC类型的可视化表示必须是精确的,因为传统维度和进取维度在工作环境方面非常相似。本研究为基于注视的职业兴趣测试提供了第一个基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between eye movement behavior and vocational interests
The career choice is an important step in life. Popular vocational interest tests aim to adopt a self-reflective and text-based approach. As a result, young adults sometimes choose professions that offer good pay and job security; but their own interests fall by the wayside. Therefore, it is important to optimally support young people in finding a suitable career path. A new approach is the analysis of vocational interests through eye movement behavior. Eyes move involuntarily and deliver results beyond subjective, verbal tests. For this study, German adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 were shown a picture with six professions that correspond to Holland's personality types (RIASEC = Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional). The results revealed that dwell time, fixation count and an image-related evaluation are suitable for determining interests. Not all eye movement data is adequate for measuring vocational interests. Time to first fixation did not show significant correlations. In addition, the visual representation of the RIASEC types must be precise, because the Conventional and Enterprising dimensions are very similar in terms of the working environment. This study thus provides the first foundations for a gaze-based vocational interest test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Low modesty and feeling deprived as a man: A psychological explanation of men's rights activism Narcissism and self- esteem as predictors of exchange and communal relational orientations When feeling too much hurts: emotional intelligence profiles and their implications for mental health Investigating the relationship between antagonistic personality traits and problematic sexual behaviour: The role of gender and emotional stress Connecting attachment to passion: Insights into the four-stage developmental process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1