运用因果中介分析和目标学习分析交通量在交通政策评价中的中介作用

IF 7.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104369
Yingheng Zhang , Haojie Li , Gang Ren
{"title":"运用因果中介分析和目标学习分析交通量在交通政策评价中的中介作用","authors":"Yingheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Haojie Li ,&nbsp;Gang Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traffic volume has often been analysed as the outcome of interest in transport policy evaluation. However, its role as mediator lying in the causal pathways between policies and other outcomes has rarely been explored. We investigate this issue by using a targeted learning-based causal mediation analysis approach. Compared to the traditional approach that has been used in transport research, namely the Baron-Kenny multiple-regression approach, the causal one incorporating potential outcomes has clearer causal definitions and interpretations. Also, targeted learning has higher functional flexibility by enabling the use of supervised learning algorithms. Simulations indicate that targeted learning outperforms the traditional approach in complex settings with nonlinearities and interactions. We present an empirical example, quantifying the direct effect of the London Cycle Superhighways (LCS) on traffic speed, and the indirect effect via traffic volume as mediator. Our results indicate that the installation of LCS has reduced motor traffic along the routes. The average causal effect on annual average daily traffic (AADT) relative to the AADT in the pre-intervention period is − 9.2 %. Regarding the direct and indirect effects, we find that LCS has a negative direct effect on traffic speed, which might be due to less space available for motor vehicles, while LCS can increase traffic speed via reducing the amount of motor traffic. The direct effect on traffic speed relative to the speed in the pre-intervention period is − 2.0 %, whereas the indirect effect is + 1.3 %. As a result, the total causal effect on speed is small.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104369"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the role of traffic volume as mediator in transport policy evaluation with causal mediation analysis and targeted learning\",\"authors\":\"Yingheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Haojie Li ,&nbsp;Gang Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traffic volume has often been analysed as the outcome of interest in transport policy evaluation. However, its role as mediator lying in the causal pathways between policies and other outcomes has rarely been explored. We investigate this issue by using a targeted learning-based causal mediation analysis approach. Compared to the traditional approach that has been used in transport research, namely the Baron-Kenny multiple-regression approach, the causal one incorporating potential outcomes has clearer causal definitions and interpretations. Also, targeted learning has higher functional flexibility by enabling the use of supervised learning algorithms. Simulations indicate that targeted learning outperforms the traditional approach in complex settings with nonlinearities and interactions. We present an empirical example, quantifying the direct effect of the London Cycle Superhighways (LCS) on traffic speed, and the indirect effect via traffic volume as mediator. Our results indicate that the installation of LCS has reduced motor traffic along the routes. The average causal effect on annual average daily traffic (AADT) relative to the AADT in the pre-intervention period is − 9.2 %. Regarding the direct and indirect effects, we find that LCS has a negative direct effect on traffic speed, which might be due to less space available for motor vehicles, while LCS can increase traffic speed via reducing the amount of motor traffic. The direct effect on traffic speed relative to the speed in the pre-intervention period is − 2.0 %, whereas the indirect effect is + 1.3 %. As a result, the total causal effect on speed is small.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004178\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424004178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通量经常被分析为交通政策评估的结果。然而,它在政策和其他结果之间的因果路径中所起的中介作用却很少得到探讨。我们通过使用有针对性的基于学习的因果中介分析方法来研究这个问题。与交通研究中使用的传统方法(即Baron-Kenny多元回归方法)相比,包含潜在结果的因果方法具有更清晰的因果定义和解释。此外,通过使用监督学习算法,目标学习具有更高的功能灵活性。仿真结果表明,在具有非线性和相互作用的复杂环境中,目标学习优于传统方法。本文通过实证分析,量化了伦敦自行车高速公路(LCS)对交通速度的直接影响,以及以交通量为中介的间接影响。我们的研究结果表明,LCS的安装减少了沿线的机动车流量。相对于干预前的年平均日交通量(AADT),其平均因果效应为- 9.2%。在直接和间接影响方面,我们发现LCS对交通速度有负的直接影响,这可能是由于机动车可用空间减少,而LCS可以通过减少机动车交通量来提高交通速度。相对于干预前的交通速度,直接影响为- 2.0%,而间接影响为+ 1.3%。因此,对速度的总因果影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing the role of traffic volume as mediator in transport policy evaluation with causal mediation analysis and targeted learning
Traffic volume has often been analysed as the outcome of interest in transport policy evaluation. However, its role as mediator lying in the causal pathways between policies and other outcomes has rarely been explored. We investigate this issue by using a targeted learning-based causal mediation analysis approach. Compared to the traditional approach that has been used in transport research, namely the Baron-Kenny multiple-regression approach, the causal one incorporating potential outcomes has clearer causal definitions and interpretations. Also, targeted learning has higher functional flexibility by enabling the use of supervised learning algorithms. Simulations indicate that targeted learning outperforms the traditional approach in complex settings with nonlinearities and interactions. We present an empirical example, quantifying the direct effect of the London Cycle Superhighways (LCS) on traffic speed, and the indirect effect via traffic volume as mediator. Our results indicate that the installation of LCS has reduced motor traffic along the routes. The average causal effect on annual average daily traffic (AADT) relative to the AADT in the pre-intervention period is − 9.2 %. Regarding the direct and indirect effects, we find that LCS has a negative direct effect on traffic speed, which might be due to less space available for motor vehicles, while LCS can increase traffic speed via reducing the amount of motor traffic. The direct effect on traffic speed relative to the speed in the pre-intervention period is − 2.0 %, whereas the indirect effect is + 1.3 %. As a result, the total causal effect on speed is small.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Penalties as prices? evaluating airline strategic responses to tarmac delay penalties in the US Hydrogen-powered aviation: What do we know and where do we go? Urban informal transportation and gentrification: empirical evidence from motorcycle taxis in Bangkok, Thailand Impacts of transportation infrastructure on the stopping behavior of heavy commercial vehicles Tracks of equality: high-speed rail and its effects on intra-regional inequality—a quasi-experimental study based on China’s district/county-level data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1