同一地点的两种陶器风格:来自中国江淮地区六墩遗址的化学和矿物学见解

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.104974
Qinglin Li , Xiaochun Chen , Yuxiao Kang , Tao Li
{"title":"同一地点的两种陶器风格:来自中国江淮地区六墩遗址的化学和矿物学见解","authors":"Qinglin Li ,&nbsp;Xiaochun Chen ,&nbsp;Yuxiao Kang ,&nbsp;Tao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.104974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Excavations in the Yangtze-Huaihe region, a culture crossroads of southern and northern China, have uncovered numerous Late Neolithic sites with pottery stylistically featuring two or more contemporaneous cultures, indicating contact and exchange with areas like the eastern seaboard (Haidai). This study uses benchtop X-ray fluorescence, X-ray powder diffraction, and thermal expansion methods to investigate the chemical and mineralogical compositions and firing temperatures of 62 Longshan-style and Qianshanyang-style vessel sherds from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region. Typological analysis suggests that both pottery styles coexisted at Liudun, though the reasons for this remained unexplored.</div><div>The chemical variability indicates that three clay sources were used for the investigated pottery, with two shared by both styles and one noticed only among the Longshan style. The mineralogical composition of 20 Longshan and six Qianshanyang coarse-paste sherds is largely consistent, possibly indicating similar tempering practices. Firing minerals such as spinel indicate some pottery may have been fired at higher temperatures. Thermal expansion analysis confirmed that both Longshan and Qianshanyang pottery were fired at two different temperature ranges: lower (700–800 °C) and higher (900–1000 °C). Combining archaeometric evidence with pottery functions and styles, we conclude that the two pottery styles were produced at Liudun using local clays and tempering materials. We propose that Qianshanyang vessels were recreated items at this Longshan-type site rather than imported finished products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two pottery styles at one site: Chemical and mineralogical insights from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region of China\",\"authors\":\"Qinglin Li ,&nbsp;Xiaochun Chen ,&nbsp;Yuxiao Kang ,&nbsp;Tao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.104974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Excavations in the Yangtze-Huaihe region, a culture crossroads of southern and northern China, have uncovered numerous Late Neolithic sites with pottery stylistically featuring two or more contemporaneous cultures, indicating contact and exchange with areas like the eastern seaboard (Haidai). This study uses benchtop X-ray fluorescence, X-ray powder diffraction, and thermal expansion methods to investigate the chemical and mineralogical compositions and firing temperatures of 62 Longshan-style and Qianshanyang-style vessel sherds from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region. Typological analysis suggests that both pottery styles coexisted at Liudun, though the reasons for this remained unexplored.</div><div>The chemical variability indicates that three clay sources were used for the investigated pottery, with two shared by both styles and one noticed only among the Longshan style. The mineralogical composition of 20 Longshan and six Qianshanyang coarse-paste sherds is largely consistent, possibly indicating similar tempering practices. Firing minerals such as spinel indicate some pottery may have been fired at higher temperatures. Thermal expansion analysis confirmed that both Longshan and Qianshanyang pottery were fired at two different temperature ranges: lower (700–800 °C) and higher (900–1000 °C). Combining archaeometric evidence with pottery functions and styles, we conclude that the two pottery styles were produced at Liudun using local clays and tempering materials. We propose that Qianshanyang vessels were recreated items at this Longshan-type site rather than imported finished products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25000069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国南北文化交汇的长江-淮河地区,发掘出了许多新石器时代晚期的陶器遗址,这些遗址在风格上具有两种或两种以上的同时期文化,表明与东部沿海地区(海代)等地区的联系和交流。本研究采用台式x射线荧光、x射线粉末衍射和热膨胀等方法,对江淮地区六墩遗址62件龙山式和钱山阳式器物的化学、矿物组成和烧成温度进行了研究。类型学分析表明,这两种陶器风格在六墩同时存在,尽管原因尚不清楚。化学变化表明,所研究的陶器使用了三种粘土来源,其中两种风格共有两种粘土来源,另一种仅在龙山风格中发现。20块龙山粗膏体碎片和6块千山阳粗膏体碎片的矿物组成基本一致,可能表明类似的回火做法。燃烧矿物如尖晶石表明一些陶器可能是在更高的温度下烧制的。热膨胀分析证实,龙山和千山阳陶器的烧制温度范围不同:较低(700-800°C)和较高(900-1000°C)。结合考古证据和陶器的功能和风格,我们得出结论,这两种风格的陶器是在六墩使用当地粘土和回火材料生产的。我们认为,千山阳船是在龙山式遗址再造的物品,而不是进口成品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two pottery styles at one site: Chemical and mineralogical insights from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region of China
Excavations in the Yangtze-Huaihe region, a culture crossroads of southern and northern China, have uncovered numerous Late Neolithic sites with pottery stylistically featuring two or more contemporaneous cultures, indicating contact and exchange with areas like the eastern seaboard (Haidai). This study uses benchtop X-ray fluorescence, X-ray powder diffraction, and thermal expansion methods to investigate the chemical and mineralogical compositions and firing temperatures of 62 Longshan-style and Qianshanyang-style vessel sherds from the Liudun site in the Yangtze-Huaihe region. Typological analysis suggests that both pottery styles coexisted at Liudun, though the reasons for this remained unexplored.
The chemical variability indicates that three clay sources were used for the investigated pottery, with two shared by both styles and one noticed only among the Longshan style. The mineralogical composition of 20 Longshan and six Qianshanyang coarse-paste sherds is largely consistent, possibly indicating similar tempering practices. Firing minerals such as spinel indicate some pottery may have been fired at higher temperatures. Thermal expansion analysis confirmed that both Longshan and Qianshanyang pottery were fired at two different temperature ranges: lower (700–800 °C) and higher (900–1000 °C). Combining archaeometric evidence with pottery functions and styles, we conclude that the two pottery styles were produced at Liudun using local clays and tempering materials. We propose that Qianshanyang vessels were recreated items at this Longshan-type site rather than imported finished products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Ming Dynasty (1368–1644 CE) chicken husbandry at the Palace of Shu King: human-directed selection effects on body size and skeletal allometry Morphospace of bifacial leafpoints from the eponymous Palaeolithic sites of Sajóbábony and Szeleta Cave (Hungary) Geophysical and archaeological survey of the Hellenistic period settlement Iskandar Tepa in the Bactro-Sogdian borderlands Brass and high-tin bronze use at Siraf, a prosperous Persian Gulf port city of the late first millennium CE Petrographic and geochemical characterization of Eocene limestones from Thugga / Dougga (Tunisia): Implications for the provenance of stones used in construction and sculpture in the ancient town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1