电力系统环境排放和发电成本最小化调度的Puma算法

IF 3.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02547
Badr Al Faiya , Ghareeb Moustafa , Hashim Alnami , Ahmed R. Ginidi , Abdullah M. Shaheen
{"title":"电力系统环境排放和发电成本最小化调度的Puma算法","authors":"Badr Al Faiya ,&nbsp;Ghareeb Moustafa ,&nbsp;Hashim Alnami ,&nbsp;Ahmed R. Ginidi ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Shaheen","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing power systems is a crucial task nowadays for cost-effective operations that ensure profitability for providers and affordability for consumers. Also, efforts are directed toward harmonizing economic objectives with environmental conservation through accurate modelling of the Economic and Environmental Dispatch (EED) problem. This study adopts a more complex approach by formulating the fuel cost and produced emission objectives as cubic polynomial functions. Also, this paper proposes a novel Puma Optimization Operator (POO), inspired by the hunting behavior of pumas for the optimal allocation of power generation across various units, considering both economic and environmental factors. It efficiently navigates the solution space by balancing exploration and exploitation, leveraging puma-like intelligence to minimize both fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions, including CO2, NOx, and SO2. The POO algorithm is tested on the IEEE 30-bus power system with six thermal units, delivering superior performance compared to advanced optimization algorithms such as the Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), Slim Mould Algorithm (SMA), Artificial Rabbit Optimization (ARO), and Coati optimization technique. The POO algorithm consistently outperforms other algorithms in minimizing both generation and emission costs across all loading levels, with improvement percentages ranging from approximately 1.221 % to 1.6 % compared to OOA, 0.59 % to 0.86 % compared to AO, 2.47 % to 3.42 % compared to SMA, 0.89 % to 1.67 % compared to Coati and 0.03 % to 0.13 % compared to ARO. Moreover, statistical analysis underscores POO's superior performance compared to other optimizers, establishing it as a highly competitive option concerning both cost and emissions. Also, the study is extended to address the dynamic ED problem, incorporating a 24 h load demand profile and ramp-rate constraints for power generation units. The proposed POO dynamically adjusts the power outputs of generators to meet hourly demand while adhering to operational limits. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach ensures smooth transitions in generator outputs, respects dynamic operational constraints, and achieves a realistic balance between cost efficiency and environmental impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e02547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Puma algorithm for environmental emissions and generation costs minimization dispatch in power systems\",\"authors\":\"Badr Al Faiya ,&nbsp;Ghareeb Moustafa ,&nbsp;Hashim Alnami ,&nbsp;Ahmed R. Ginidi ,&nbsp;Abdullah M. Shaheen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Optimizing power systems is a crucial task nowadays for cost-effective operations that ensure profitability for providers and affordability for consumers. Also, efforts are directed toward harmonizing economic objectives with environmental conservation through accurate modelling of the Economic and Environmental Dispatch (EED) problem. This study adopts a more complex approach by formulating the fuel cost and produced emission objectives as cubic polynomial functions. Also, this paper proposes a novel Puma Optimization Operator (POO), inspired by the hunting behavior of pumas for the optimal allocation of power generation across various units, considering both economic and environmental factors. It efficiently navigates the solution space by balancing exploration and exploitation, leveraging puma-like intelligence to minimize both fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions, including CO2, NOx, and SO2. The POO algorithm is tested on the IEEE 30-bus power system with six thermal units, delivering superior performance compared to advanced optimization algorithms such as the Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), Slim Mould Algorithm (SMA), Artificial Rabbit Optimization (ARO), and Coati optimization technique. The POO algorithm consistently outperforms other algorithms in minimizing both generation and emission costs across all loading levels, with improvement percentages ranging from approximately 1.221 % to 1.6 % compared to OOA, 0.59 % to 0.86 % compared to AO, 2.47 % to 3.42 % compared to SMA, 0.89 % to 1.67 % compared to Coati and 0.03 % to 0.13 % compared to ARO. Moreover, statistical analysis underscores POO's superior performance compared to other optimizers, establishing it as a highly competitive option concerning both cost and emissions. Also, the study is extended to address the dynamic ED problem, incorporating a 24 h load demand profile and ramp-rate constraints for power generation units. The proposed POO dynamically adjusts the power outputs of generators to meet hourly demand while adhering to operational limits. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach ensures smooth transitions in generator outputs, respects dynamic operational constraints, and achieves a realistic balance between cost efficiency and environmental impact.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific African\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article e02547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific African\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化电力系统是当今经济高效运营的关键任务,确保供应商的盈利能力和消费者的负担能力。此外,通过对经济和环境调度(EED)问题的准确建模,努力协调经济目标与环境保护。本研究采用更为复杂的方法,将燃料成本和生产排放目标表述为三次多项式函数。此外,本文还提出了一种新的美洲豹优化算子(Puma Optimization Operator, POO),该算子受美洲豹狩猎行为的启发,在考虑经济和环境因素的情况下,实现了各机组间发电量的最优分配。它通过平衡勘探和开发,有效地导航解决方案空间,利用类似美洲豹的智能来最大限度地降低燃料成本和温室气体排放,包括二氧化碳、氮氧化物和二氧化硫。POO算法在IEEE 30总线6热单元电力系统上进行了测试,与先进的优化算法如鱼鹰优化算法(OOA)、Aquila优化器(AO)、Slim Mould算法(SMA)、人工兔子优化(ARO)和Coati优化技术相比,POO算法具有优越的性能。在所有负载水平下,POO算法在最小化发电和排放成本方面始终优于其他算法,与OOA相比,其改进百分比约为1.221%至1.6%,与AO相比为0.59%至0.86%,与SMA相比为2.47%至3.42%,与Coati相比为0.89%至1.67%,与ARO相比为0.03%至0.13%。此外,统计分析强调了POO与其他优化器相比的优越性能,将其确定为在成本和排放方面具有高度竞争力的选择。此外,该研究扩展到解决动态ED问题,将24小时负荷需求曲线和发电机组的斜坡率约束纳入其中。该方案在遵守运行限制的前提下,动态调整发电机的输出功率以满足每小时的需求。结果表明,该方法确保了发电机输出的平稳过渡,尊重动态运行约束,并在成本效率和环境影响之间实现了现实的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Puma algorithm for environmental emissions and generation costs minimization dispatch in power systems
Optimizing power systems is a crucial task nowadays for cost-effective operations that ensure profitability for providers and affordability for consumers. Also, efforts are directed toward harmonizing economic objectives with environmental conservation through accurate modelling of the Economic and Environmental Dispatch (EED) problem. This study adopts a more complex approach by formulating the fuel cost and produced emission objectives as cubic polynomial functions. Also, this paper proposes a novel Puma Optimization Operator (POO), inspired by the hunting behavior of pumas for the optimal allocation of power generation across various units, considering both economic and environmental factors. It efficiently navigates the solution space by balancing exploration and exploitation, leveraging puma-like intelligence to minimize both fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions, including CO2, NOx, and SO2. The POO algorithm is tested on the IEEE 30-bus power system with six thermal units, delivering superior performance compared to advanced optimization algorithms such as the Osprey Optimization Algorithm (OOA), Aquila Optimizer (AO), Slim Mould Algorithm (SMA), Artificial Rabbit Optimization (ARO), and Coati optimization technique. The POO algorithm consistently outperforms other algorithms in minimizing both generation and emission costs across all loading levels, with improvement percentages ranging from approximately 1.221 % to 1.6 % compared to OOA, 0.59 % to 0.86 % compared to AO, 2.47 % to 3.42 % compared to SMA, 0.89 % to 1.67 % compared to Coati and 0.03 % to 0.13 % compared to ARO. Moreover, statistical analysis underscores POO's superior performance compared to other optimizers, establishing it as a highly competitive option concerning both cost and emissions. Also, the study is extended to address the dynamic ED problem, incorporating a 24 h load demand profile and ramp-rate constraints for power generation units. The proposed POO dynamically adjusts the power outputs of generators to meet hourly demand while adhering to operational limits. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach ensures smooth transitions in generator outputs, respects dynamic operational constraints, and achieves a realistic balance between cost efficiency and environmental impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking data fusion approaches for enhanced soil moisture mapping over Africa using GNSS-R Complementarity between stated and revealed preferences in pedestrian route choice: Evidence from a university campus living lab in Kampala Bamboo as a nature-based solution for sustainable energy and carbon offsetting in Ghana: opportunities, barriers, and policy pathways Transforming the future of finance and business management with AI: Exploring mathematical modeling, automation, risk management, and data-driven decision making Advancing agro-food processing productivity through blended finance: Evidence from a bibliometric review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1