{"title":"探索通过二氧化碳直接加氢的费托反应(FT)的替代反应器配置","authors":"Liang J. Jhuang , Cheng-Jui Yang , Bor-Yih Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2025.105989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Converting CO<sub>2</sub> into various fuels (e.g., light hydrocarbons, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel) through the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction is a promising option in a future decarbonized economy.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Four scenarios characterized by different chain propagation probabilities (α) described by the Anderson-Schultz-Flory (ASF) distribution were developed, corresponding to the production of light hydrocarbons (α=0.3), gasoline (α=0.65), jet fuel (α=0.75), and diesel (α=0.85). Deviations from the standard ASF distribution for lower carbon numbers at high ɑ values were considered. For each scenario, alternative configurations utilizing different reactor structural parameters, employing various heat transfer methods, were investigated through mathematical modeling. Multi-objective optimization, aiming to maximize conversion and minimizing costs, was conducted to determine the optimal design and operating conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Significant Findings</h3><div>Overall, compared to single-stage configurations, dual-stage configurations offer opportunities for cost reduction and process intensification across all four scenarios. When utilizing counter-current heat exchange, higher conversion can be achieved at a lower cost with moderate conversion levels. In contrast, configurations with co-current heat exchange tend to enhance conversion by extending the reactor length once conversion exceeds 30 %. Furthermore, when using a dual-stage configuration to produce longer hydrocarbons, it is not appropriate to produce shorter hydrocarbons as intermediates that exit from the first reactor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 105989"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of alternative reactor configurations for the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction via direct hydrogenation of carbon dioxide\",\"authors\":\"Liang J. Jhuang , Cheng-Jui Yang , Bor-Yih Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtice.2025.105989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Converting CO<sub>2</sub> into various fuels (e.g., light hydrocarbons, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel) through the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction is a promising option in a future decarbonized economy.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Four scenarios characterized by different chain propagation probabilities (α) described by the Anderson-Schultz-Flory (ASF) distribution were developed, corresponding to the production of light hydrocarbons (α=0.3), gasoline (α=0.65), jet fuel (α=0.75), and diesel (α=0.85). Deviations from the standard ASF distribution for lower carbon numbers at high ɑ values were considered. For each scenario, alternative configurations utilizing different reactor structural parameters, employing various heat transfer methods, were investigated through mathematical modeling. Multi-objective optimization, aiming to maximize conversion and minimizing costs, was conducted to determine the optimal design and operating conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Significant Findings</h3><div>Overall, compared to single-stage configurations, dual-stage configurations offer opportunities for cost reduction and process intensification across all four scenarios. When utilizing counter-current heat exchange, higher conversion can be achieved at a lower cost with moderate conversion levels. In contrast, configurations with co-current heat exchange tend to enhance conversion by extending the reactor length once conversion exceeds 30 %. Furthermore, when using a dual-stage configuration to produce longer hydrocarbons, it is not appropriate to produce shorter hydrocarbons as intermediates that exit from the first reactor.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"volume\":\"169 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107025000409\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107025000409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploration of alternative reactor configurations for the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction via direct hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Background
Converting CO2 into various fuels (e.g., light hydrocarbons, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel) through the Fischer-Tropsch (FT) reaction is a promising option in a future decarbonized economy.
Method
Four scenarios characterized by different chain propagation probabilities (α) described by the Anderson-Schultz-Flory (ASF) distribution were developed, corresponding to the production of light hydrocarbons (α=0.3), gasoline (α=0.65), jet fuel (α=0.75), and diesel (α=0.85). Deviations from the standard ASF distribution for lower carbon numbers at high ɑ values were considered. For each scenario, alternative configurations utilizing different reactor structural parameters, employing various heat transfer methods, were investigated through mathematical modeling. Multi-objective optimization, aiming to maximize conversion and minimizing costs, was conducted to determine the optimal design and operating conditions.
Significant Findings
Overall, compared to single-stage configurations, dual-stage configurations offer opportunities for cost reduction and process intensification across all four scenarios. When utilizing counter-current heat exchange, higher conversion can be achieved at a lower cost with moderate conversion levels. In contrast, configurations with co-current heat exchange tend to enhance conversion by extending the reactor length once conversion exceeds 30 %. Furthermore, when using a dual-stage configuration to produce longer hydrocarbons, it is not appropriate to produce shorter hydrocarbons as intermediates that exit from the first reactor.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.