可可肥料建议:一种offtake模型方法

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463
Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano , Lotte Suzanne Woittiez , Joost van Heerwaarden , Leonard Rusinamhodzi , Stefan Hauser , Ken E. Giller
{"title":"可可肥料建议:一种offtake模型方法","authors":"Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano ,&nbsp;Lotte Suzanne Woittiez ,&nbsp;Joost van Heerwaarden ,&nbsp;Leonard Rusinamhodzi ,&nbsp;Stefan Hauser ,&nbsp;Ken E. Giller","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T4 (1227 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T2 (917 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 127463"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach\",\"authors\":\"Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano ,&nbsp;Lotte Suzanne Woittiez ,&nbsp;Joost van Heerwaarden ,&nbsp;Leonard Rusinamhodzi ,&nbsp;Stefan Hauser ,&nbsp;Ken E. Giller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T4 (1227 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T2 (917 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003848\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西非的可可产量多年来一直在增加,但由于肥料使用有限、维护不善和虫害防治不足等因素,产量停滞不前。关于可可矿物质营养的现有知识是有限的,各国和各地区的肥料建议过时且不一致。本研究旨在开发和描述一种基于营养输出(豆荚和豆类)和树内固定的可可N, P, K吸收模型。该模型被用于计算在Côte科特迪瓦、加纳、尼日利亚和喀麦隆进行的195个农场试验的肥料用量。我们比较了可可产量对肥料用量的反应,使用承载量模型得出了每个国家对国家建议的反应。在每个农场,划定了四个处理地块。治疗:T1 = 农民当前的做法,T2 = 除草+ 修剪+ 杀虫剂应用+ 杀菌剂应用(没有化肥的应用程序),T3 = 除草+ 修剪+ 杀虫剂应用+ 杀菌剂应用+ 当前国家肥料推荐和T4 = 除草+ 修剪+应用+  杀虫剂杀菌剂应用+ 承购基于模型的肥料推荐。从2021年9月到2022年8月记录了产量,并使用2020/2021年和2022/2023年的两种不同情景价格进行了经济评估。结果表明,施用化肥对可可产量有积极影响,其中T3(1109 kg ha - 1)和T4(1227 kg ha - 1)的产量显著高于T1(912 kg ha - 1)和T2(917 kg ha - 1)。T4对T3的总体产量效应也为正;然而,只有在Côte科特迪瓦,这种差异才显著。经济评估表明,在所有国家,基于承购模型(T4)的处理的总回报高于国家建议(T3)。然而,由于化肥价格上涨,收益从20/21-22/23下降。我们的研究结果表明,使用摄取模型方法可以更准确地估计可可的营养需求。然而,尽管可可农场收购价仍然很低,但农民购买肥料的投资能力仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach
Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha−1) and T4 (1227 kg ha−1) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha−1) and T2 (917 kg ha−1). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Genotype-by-environment interaction and grain yield stability analysis of spring faba bean under rainfed conditions in Northwest China: Identifying ideotypes and key monthly rainfall constraints A data driven approach to assessing the increased soil compaction risks from combine harvesters over time Development of a lucerne model in APSIM next generation: 4 N dynamics and forage quality of genotypes with different fall dormancies Oat genetic gain and phenotypic plasticity of yield and grain quality traits over five decades of breeding in Australia Integrated maize yield and phosphorus use efficiency through optimized root growth and photosynthesis performance under drip phosphorus fertigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1