Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano , Lotte Suzanne Woittiez , Joost van Heerwaarden , Leonard Rusinamhodzi , Stefan Hauser , Ken E. Giller
{"title":"可可肥料建议:一种offtake模型方法","authors":"Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano , Lotte Suzanne Woittiez , Joost van Heerwaarden , Leonard Rusinamhodzi , Stefan Hauser , Ken E. Giller","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T4 (1227 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T2 (917 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 127463"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach\",\"authors\":\"Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano , Lotte Suzanne Woittiez , Joost van Heerwaarden , Leonard Rusinamhodzi , Stefan Hauser , Ken E. Giller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T4 (1227 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and T2 (917 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003848\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124003848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
西非的可可产量多年来一直在增加,但由于肥料使用有限、维护不善和虫害防治不足等因素,产量停滞不前。关于可可矿物质营养的现有知识是有限的,各国和各地区的肥料建议过时且不一致。本研究旨在开发和描述一种基于营养输出(豆荚和豆类)和树内固定的可可N, P, K吸收模型。该模型被用于计算在Côte科特迪瓦、加纳、尼日利亚和喀麦隆进行的195个农场试验的肥料用量。我们比较了可可产量对肥料用量的反应,使用承载量模型得出了每个国家对国家建议的反应。在每个农场,划定了四个处理地块。治疗:T1 = 农民当前的做法,T2 = 除草+ 修剪+ 杀虫剂应用+ 杀菌剂应用(没有化肥的应用程序),T3 = 除草+ 修剪+ 杀虫剂应用+ 杀菌剂应用+ 当前国家肥料推荐和T4 = 除草+ 修剪+应用+ 杀虫剂杀菌剂应用+ 承购基于模型的肥料推荐。从2021年9月到2022年8月记录了产量,并使用2020/2021年和2022/2023年的两种不同情景价格进行了经济评估。结果表明,施用化肥对可可产量有积极影响,其中T3(1109 kg ha - 1)和T4(1227 kg ha - 1)的产量显著高于T1(912 kg ha - 1)和T2(917 kg ha - 1)。T4对T3的总体产量效应也为正;然而,只有在Côte科特迪瓦,这种差异才显著。经济评估表明,在所有国家,基于承购模型(T4)的处理的总回报高于国家建议(T3)。然而,由于化肥价格上涨,收益从20/21-22/23下降。我们的研究结果表明,使用摄取模型方法可以更准确地估计可可的营养需求。然而,尽管可可农场收购价仍然很低,但农民购买肥料的投资能力仍然有限。
Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach
Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha−1) and T4 (1227 kg ha−1) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha−1) and T2 (917 kg ha−1). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics:
crop physiology
crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management
agroclimatology and modelling
plant-soil relationships
crop quality and post-harvest physiology
farming and cropping systems
agroecosystems and the environment
crop-weed interactions and management
organic farming
horticultural crops
papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings
In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.