反馈效应或挤出效应:金融化对实体企业主营业务绩效的影响

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2025.103879
Di Zheng , Guang Yang , Lei Lei , Pinghua Li
{"title":"反馈效应或挤出效应:金融化对实体企业主营业务绩效的影响","authors":"Di Zheng ,&nbsp;Guang Yang ,&nbsp;Lei Lei ,&nbsp;Pinghua Li","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Facing the current trend of the virtualization of the real economy, this paper examines the influence of financialization on the main business performance of real enterprises. Theoretically, corporate financialization often stems from the motives of “reservoir” and “speculative arbitrage”, which in turn lead to the “feed-back effect” or the “crowding-out effect. Collecting data from China's A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2022, this study constructs a micro-level indicator of corporate financialization and empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of financialization on their main business performance. The findings reveal that, overall, financialization has a detrimental impact on their main business performance, indicating that the “crowding-out effect” outweighs the “feed-back effect”. This conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests. Further mechanistic tests demonstrate that financialization does not act as a “reservoir” to reserve liquidity funds; rather, it inhibits corporate innovation investments and real capital investments, thereby diminishing the main business performance of real enterprises. This research, from the micro-level perspective, proves the influence of financialization on the development of real enterprises to be negative. It also offers empirical support for government to strengthen financial regulation of real enterprises and guide capital to “return from virtual to real”.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103879"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feed-back effect or crowding-out effect: The influence of financialization on the main business performance of real enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Di Zheng ,&nbsp;Guang Yang ,&nbsp;Lei Lei ,&nbsp;Pinghua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2025.103879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Facing the current trend of the virtualization of the real economy, this paper examines the influence of financialization on the main business performance of real enterprises. Theoretically, corporate financialization often stems from the motives of “reservoir” and “speculative arbitrage”, which in turn lead to the “feed-back effect” or the “crowding-out effect. Collecting data from China's A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2022, this study constructs a micro-level indicator of corporate financialization and empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of financialization on their main business performance. The findings reveal that, overall, financialization has a detrimental impact on their main business performance, indicating that the “crowding-out effect” outweighs the “feed-back effect”. This conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests. Further mechanistic tests demonstrate that financialization does not act as a “reservoir” to reserve liquidity funds; rather, it inhibits corporate innovation investments and real capital investments, thereby diminishing the main business performance of real enterprises. This research, from the micro-level perspective, proves the influence of financialization on the development of real enterprises to be negative. It also offers empirical support for government to strengthen financial regulation of real enterprises and guide capital to “return from virtual to real”.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000425\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面对当前实体经济虚拟化的趋势,本文考察了金融化对实体企业主营业务绩效的影响。从理论上讲,企业金融化往往源于“储层”和“投机性套利”的动机,进而导致“反馈效应”或“挤出效应”。本研究以2012 - 2022年中国a股上市公司为样本,构建了企业金融化微观指标,实证检验了金融化对企业主营业务绩效的影响及机制。研究结果表明,总体而言,金融化对其主营业务绩效的影响是不利的,表明“挤出效应”大于“反馈效应”。经过一系列稳健性检验,这一结论仍然是稳健性的。进一步的机制测试表明,金融化并不充当储备流动性资金的“储库”;相反,它抑制了企业的创新投资和实体资本投资,从而降低了实体企业的主营业务绩效。本研究从微观层面证明了金融化对实体企业发展的负面影响。为政府加强对实体企业的金融监管,引导资本“脱虚返实”提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feed-back effect or crowding-out effect: The influence of financialization on the main business performance of real enterprises
Facing the current trend of the virtualization of the real economy, this paper examines the influence of financialization on the main business performance of real enterprises. Theoretically, corporate financialization often stems from the motives of “reservoir” and “speculative arbitrage”, which in turn lead to the “feed-back effect” or the “crowding-out effect. Collecting data from China's A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2022, this study constructs a micro-level indicator of corporate financialization and empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of financialization on their main business performance. The findings reveal that, overall, financialization has a detrimental impact on their main business performance, indicating that the “crowding-out effect” outweighs the “feed-back effect”. This conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness tests. Further mechanistic tests demonstrate that financialization does not act as a “reservoir” to reserve liquidity funds; rather, it inhibits corporate innovation investments and real capital investments, thereby diminishing the main business performance of real enterprises. This research, from the micro-level perspective, proves the influence of financialization on the development of real enterprises to be negative. It also offers empirical support for government to strengthen financial regulation of real enterprises and guide capital to “return from virtual to real”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
The impact of local government debt on leverage adjustment speed: Evidence from China Digital financial usage and agricultural scale operation performance in China Digital transformation and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China Digital-intelligent technologies, green ambidextrous innovation, and green transformation in manufacturing enterprises Economic and regulatory drivers of consumer-centric product innovation: A case study of Chinese smartphones in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1