揭示中国医疗废物处置的未来环境负担及缓解途径

IF 10.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108116
Yunchang Ding , Qiuxia Zou , Zeguo Yang , Sha Liang , Huijie Hou , Wenbo Yu , Yufei Yang , Huabo Duan , Jiakuan Yang
{"title":"揭示中国医疗废物处置的未来环境负担及缓解途径","authors":"Yunchang Ding ,&nbsp;Qiuxia Zou ,&nbsp;Zeguo Yang ,&nbsp;Sha Liang ,&nbsp;Huijie Hou ,&nbsp;Wenbo Yu ,&nbsp;Yufei Yang ,&nbsp;Huabo Duan ,&nbsp;Jiakuan Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid expansion of healthcare facilities plays a critical role in achieving health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3. However, managing the increasing volume of medical waste (MW) presents a major challenge for nations worldwide. This study conducts a comparative life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts and costs of various MW disposal pathways within the context of China. Particular focus is placed on carbon emission intensity, alongside national-level estimations and projections of total emissions. The results reveal that sterilization combined with waste-to-energy (WtE) technology has the lowest environmental impact, averaging 568 (±71) kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq per tonne of MW. In contrast, the landfill and WtE combination yields the highest economic benefit, with profits reaching $155 per tonne when accounting for local government subsidies. Nationally, MW disposal-related carbon emissions in China are projected to peak at approximately 2.50 (±0.13) million tonnes CO<sub>2</sub> eq by 2036. However, with effective management and significant mitigation efforts, these emissions could decrease by up to 78 % compared to the business-as-usual scenario by 2050.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108116"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the future environmental burdens of medical waste disposal in China and mitigation pathways\",\"authors\":\"Yunchang Ding ,&nbsp;Qiuxia Zou ,&nbsp;Zeguo Yang ,&nbsp;Sha Liang ,&nbsp;Huijie Hou ,&nbsp;Wenbo Yu ,&nbsp;Yufei Yang ,&nbsp;Huabo Duan ,&nbsp;Jiakuan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid expansion of healthcare facilities plays a critical role in achieving health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3. However, managing the increasing volume of medical waste (MW) presents a major challenge for nations worldwide. This study conducts a comparative life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts and costs of various MW disposal pathways within the context of China. Particular focus is placed on carbon emission intensity, alongside national-level estimations and projections of total emissions. The results reveal that sterilization combined with waste-to-energy (WtE) technology has the lowest environmental impact, averaging 568 (±71) kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq per tonne of MW. In contrast, the landfill and WtE combination yields the highest economic benefit, with profits reaching $155 per tonne when accounting for local government subsidies. Nationally, MW disposal-related carbon emissions in China are projected to peak at approximately 2.50 (±0.13) million tonnes CO<sub>2</sub> eq by 2036. However, with effective management and significant mitigation efforts, these emissions could decrease by up to 78 % compared to the business-as-usual scenario by 2050.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"215 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924007067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924007067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保健设施的迅速扩大在实现与卫生有关的联合国可持续发展目标3方面发挥着关键作用。然而,管理日益增加的医疗废物量是世界各国面临的一项重大挑战。本研究通过比较生命周期评估,评估中国不同兆瓦特处置途径的环境影响和成本。特别侧重于碳排放强度,以及国家一级的总排放量估计和预测。结果表明,灭菌与废物发电(WtE)技术相结合对环境的影响最小,平均每吨兆瓦568(±71)千克二氧化碳当量。相比之下,垃圾填埋和垃圾处理的结合产生了最高的经济效益,考虑到地方政府的补贴,每吨利润达到155美元。在全国范围内,预计到2036年,中国与兆瓦级处置相关的碳排放量将达到峰值,约为250万吨(±0.13万吨)二氧化碳当量。然而,通过有效的管理和重大的缓解努力,到2050年,与一切照旧情景相比,这些排放量可减少高达78%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uncovering the future environmental burdens of medical waste disposal in China and mitigation pathways
The rapid expansion of healthcare facilities plays a critical role in achieving health-related United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3. However, managing the increasing volume of medical waste (MW) presents a major challenge for nations worldwide. This study conducts a comparative life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impacts and costs of various MW disposal pathways within the context of China. Particular focus is placed on carbon emission intensity, alongside national-level estimations and projections of total emissions. The results reveal that sterilization combined with waste-to-energy (WtE) technology has the lowest environmental impact, averaging 568 (±71) kg CO2 eq per tonne of MW. In contrast, the landfill and WtE combination yields the highest economic benefit, with profits reaching $155 per tonne when accounting for local government subsidies. Nationally, MW disposal-related carbon emissions in China are projected to peak at approximately 2.50 (±0.13) million tonnes CO2 eq by 2036. However, with effective management and significant mitigation efforts, these emissions could decrease by up to 78 % compared to the business-as-usual scenario by 2050.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Untangling textile waste flows: A detailed product and material flow analysis of Dutch clothing waste Solvent and HF-free removal of polyvinylidene fluoride binder from spent lithium-ion battery cathode materials via attrition milling and liquid–liquid particle separation Odor and ammonia emission control in livestock farming: Technologies, effectiveness, and scale-based application strategies - a review Using kernel density estimation and the Dirichlet distribution for uncertainty quantification of building material emissions Assessing historic material losses in European waste from electrical and electronic equipment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1