大规模提高反馈质量:利用机器学习实现以学习者为中心的反馈

IF 23.4 Q1 Social Sciences Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100332
Ahmad Ari Aldino , Yi-Shan Tsai , Rafael Ferreira Mello , Dragan Gašević , Guanliang Chen
{"title":"大规模提高反馈质量:利用机器学习实现以学习者为中心的反馈","authors":"Ahmad Ari Aldino ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreira Mello ,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević ,&nbsp;Guanliang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In higher education, delivering effective feedback is pivotal for enhancing student learning but remains challenging due to the scale and diversity of student populations. Learner-centered feedback, a robust approach to effective feedback that tailors to individual student needs, encompasses three key dimensions—<span>Future Impact</span>, <span>Sensemaking</span>, and <span>Agency</span>, which collectively include eight specific components, thereby enhancing its relevance and impact in the learning process. However, providing consistent and effective learner-centered feedback at scale is challenging for educators. This study addresses this challenge by automating the analysis of feedback content to promote effective learner-centered feedback principles. We gathered a large-scale dataset of 16,531 feedback entries from 95 courses from one Master's and one Bachelor's program within a large faculty at an Australian university, with each entry labeled in accordance with the learner-centered feedback framework. Employing a range of machine learning and deep learning techniques, including Random Forest, XGBoost, BERT, and GPT-3.5, we systematically investigated the effectiveness of different approaches for constructing classifiers to accurately categorize feedback into various learner-centered components. The results demonstrated that the BERT-based classifiers outperformed other models in most feedback categories (achieving Cohen's <em>κ</em> up to 0.956 and F1 score up to 0.998), but showed relatively low performance in categories with less training data. This automated analysis aids in scrutinizing feedback quality, thereby supporting educators in enhancing their feedback practices to be more aligned with learner-centered principles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34469,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":23.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Feedback Quality at Scale: Leveraging Machine Learning for Learner-Centered Feedback\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Ari Aldino ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreira Mello ,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević ,&nbsp;Guanliang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In higher education, delivering effective feedback is pivotal for enhancing student learning but remains challenging due to the scale and diversity of student populations. Learner-centered feedback, a robust approach to effective feedback that tailors to individual student needs, encompasses three key dimensions—<span>Future Impact</span>, <span>Sensemaking</span>, and <span>Agency</span>, which collectively include eight specific components, thereby enhancing its relevance and impact in the learning process. However, providing consistent and effective learner-centered feedback at scale is challenging for educators. This study addresses this challenge by automating the analysis of feedback content to promote effective learner-centered feedback principles. We gathered a large-scale dataset of 16,531 feedback entries from 95 courses from one Master's and one Bachelor's program within a large faculty at an Australian university, with each entry labeled in accordance with the learner-centered feedback framework. Employing a range of machine learning and deep learning techniques, including Random Forest, XGBoost, BERT, and GPT-3.5, we systematically investigated the effectiveness of different approaches for constructing classifiers to accurately categorize feedback into various learner-centered components. The results demonstrated that the BERT-based classifiers outperformed other models in most feedback categories (achieving Cohen's <em>κ</em> up to 0.956 and F1 score up to 0.998), but showed relatively low performance in categories with less training data. This automated analysis aids in scrutinizing feedback quality, thereby supporting educators in enhancing their feedback practices to be more aligned with learner-centered principles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":23.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高等教育中,提供有效的反馈对于提高学生的学习至关重要,但由于学生群体的规模和多样性,仍然具有挑战性。以学习者为中心的反馈是一种针对个别学生需求的有效反馈的稳健方法,它包括三个关键维度——未来影响、意义制造和代理,它们共同包括八个具体组成部分,从而增强其在学习过程中的相关性和影响力。然而,对教育者来说,大规模地提供一致和有效的以学习者为中心的反馈是一项挑战。本研究通过对反馈内容的自动化分析来解决这一挑战,以促进有效的以学习者为中心的反馈原则。我们收集了一个大型数据集,其中包括来自澳大利亚一所大学一个大型学院的一个硕士和一个学士项目的95门课程的16,531个反馈条目,每个条目都按照以学习者为中心的反馈框架进行了标记。采用一系列机器学习和深度学习技术,包括随机森林、XGBoost、BERT和GPT-3.5,我们系统地研究了构建分类器的不同方法的有效性,以准确地将反馈分类为各种以学习者为中心的组件。结果表明,基于bert的分类器在大多数反馈类别中表现优于其他模型(Cohen’s κ高达0.956,F1得分高达0.998),但在训练数据较少的类别中表现相对较低。这种自动化的分析有助于仔细检查反馈质量,从而支持教育工作者增强他们的反馈实践,使其更符合以学习者为中心的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing Feedback Quality at Scale: Leveraging Machine Learning for Learner-Centered Feedback
In higher education, delivering effective feedback is pivotal for enhancing student learning but remains challenging due to the scale and diversity of student populations. Learner-centered feedback, a robust approach to effective feedback that tailors to individual student needs, encompasses three key dimensions—Future Impact, Sensemaking, and Agency, which collectively include eight specific components, thereby enhancing its relevance and impact in the learning process. However, providing consistent and effective learner-centered feedback at scale is challenging for educators. This study addresses this challenge by automating the analysis of feedback content to promote effective learner-centered feedback principles. We gathered a large-scale dataset of 16,531 feedback entries from 95 courses from one Master's and one Bachelor's program within a large faculty at an Australian university, with each entry labeled in accordance with the learner-centered feedback framework. Employing a range of machine learning and deep learning techniques, including Random Forest, XGBoost, BERT, and GPT-3.5, we systematically investigated the effectiveness of different approaches for constructing classifiers to accurately categorize feedback into various learner-centered components. The results demonstrated that the BERT-based classifiers outperformed other models in most feedback categories (achieving Cohen's κ up to 0.956 and F1 score up to 0.998), but showed relatively low performance in categories with less training data. This automated analysis aids in scrutinizing feedback quality, thereby supporting educators in enhancing their feedback practices to be more aligned with learner-centered principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Human-AI collaboration in higher education: Exploring the impact of technology expectations and distrust Decoding divides: The role of socioeconomic status and personality traits in AI divides and educational inequality Scaffolding critical thinking with generative AI: Design principles for integrating large language models in higher education Opening the blackbox of LLM-based automated essay scoring: Insights into feature weighting patterns and score validity Engagement in LLM chatbot-supported learning: The pivotal roles of GenAI competency and emotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1