从过度消费到债务拖欠:我们应该责怪移动支付吗?

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108533
Lini Zhang , Haidong Zhao
{"title":"从过度消费到债务拖欠:我们应该责怪移动支付吗?","authors":"Lini Zhang ,&nbsp;Haidong Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates whether the use of mobile payments makes consumers more vulnerable to debt delinquency and explores whether this relationship works through excessive spending. Based on a large nationally representative sample of the U.S. population, the results show that mobile payment users are more likely to be delinquent than non-users. By examining the three main sources of indebtedness (mortgages, student loans, and credit card debt) in the U.S., this study concludes that the use of mobile payments not only leads to delinquency in credit card debt but spills over into delinquency in mortgages and student loans. Further evidence reveals the underlying transmission mechanism by demonstrating that mobile payment usage is related to debt delinquency both directly and indirectly through provoking excessive spending. The findings suggest that while enjoying the benefits of mobile payments, consumers should be wary of the severe adverse consequences of using them. Implications for consumers, financial service providers, financial educators, and financial planners are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108533"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From excessive spending to debt delinquency: Should we blame mobile payments?\",\"authors\":\"Lini Zhang ,&nbsp;Haidong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates whether the use of mobile payments makes consumers more vulnerable to debt delinquency and explores whether this relationship works through excessive spending. Based on a large nationally representative sample of the U.S. population, the results show that mobile payment users are more likely to be delinquent than non-users. By examining the three main sources of indebtedness (mortgages, student loans, and credit card debt) in the U.S., this study concludes that the use of mobile payments not only leads to delinquency in credit card debt but spills over into delinquency in mortgages and student loans. Further evidence reveals the underlying transmission mechanism by demonstrating that mobile payment usage is related to debt delinquency both directly and indirectly through provoking excessive spending. The findings suggest that while enjoying the benefits of mobile payments, consumers should be wary of the severe adverse consequences of using them. Implications for consumers, financial service providers, financial educators, and financial planners are provided.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108533\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了使用移动支付是否使消费者更容易拖欠债务,并探讨了这种关系是否通过过度消费而起作用。基于美国人口的全国性代表性样本,结果显示,移动支付用户比非用户更有可能出现拖欠。通过对美国债务的三个主要来源(抵押贷款、学生贷款和信用卡债务)的研究,本研究得出结论,使用移动支付不仅会导致信用卡债务拖欠,还会蔓延到抵押贷款和学生贷款的拖欠。进一步的证据揭示了潜在的传导机制,表明移动支付的使用直接或间接地通过引发过度消费与债务违约相关。调查结果表明,消费者在享受移动支付带来的好处的同时,也应该警惕使用它们的严重不良后果。对消费者、金融服务提供者、金融教育者和金融规划师的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From excessive spending to debt delinquency: Should we blame mobile payments?
This study investigates whether the use of mobile payments makes consumers more vulnerable to debt delinquency and explores whether this relationship works through excessive spending. Based on a large nationally representative sample of the U.S. population, the results show that mobile payment users are more likely to be delinquent than non-users. By examining the three main sources of indebtedness (mortgages, student loans, and credit card debt) in the U.S., this study concludes that the use of mobile payments not only leads to delinquency in credit card debt but spills over into delinquency in mortgages and student loans. Further evidence reveals the underlying transmission mechanism by demonstrating that mobile payment usage is related to debt delinquency both directly and indirectly through provoking excessive spending. The findings suggest that while enjoying the benefits of mobile payments, consumers should be wary of the severe adverse consequences of using them. Implications for consumers, financial service providers, financial educators, and financial planners are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
When conversational AI personalises too much: Refining privacy calculus for bundled interactional cues in AI-mediated disclosure A dual-component framework of interactive attention: Gaze markers of expertise and engagement in split-attention gameplay From social trust to AI technology acceptance: A panel study of AI-Powered autonomous vehicle adoption in Singapore The role of arousal and valence in predictions of short video virality: A psychophysiological perspective Longitudinal changes in gamers’ profiles and gaming disorder risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1