在Instagram和TikTok上推广电子烟的影响者的全球联系:一项社交网络分析

IF 8.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108545
Julia Vassey , Ho-Chun Herbert Chang , Tom Valente , Jennifer B. Unger
{"title":"在Instagram和TikTok上推广电子烟的影响者的全球联系:一项社交网络分析","authors":"Julia Vassey ,&nbsp;Ho-Chun Herbert Chang ,&nbsp;Tom Valente ,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Unger","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021–2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and more active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times as high density, 281 times as high transitivity, and 86 times as high reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 108545"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: A social network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Julia Vassey ,&nbsp;Ho-Chun Herbert Chang ,&nbsp;Tom Valente ,&nbsp;Jennifer B. Unger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021–2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and more active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times as high density, 281 times as high transitivity, and 86 times as high reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004138\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224004138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接触社交媒体上的电子烟营销是青少年使用电子烟的一个风险因素。烟草品牌利用网红在社交媒体上推广电子烟;然而,网红营销并没有得到充分的研究。该研究通过全球纳米和微影响者(拥有约1000至10万名粉丝的影响者)与Instagram和TikTok上的观众在社交媒体帖子上的评论来探索网络连接和互动。我们在Instagram (N = 104)和TikTok (N = 100)网红以及Instagram (N = 55,622)和TikTok (N = 68,673)上在2021-2022年评论这些网红帖子的用户(包括评论彼此帖子的网红)之间构建了定向的单方网络。未被归类为网红的用户对帖子的评论没有被收集。与TikTok网络(密度是前者的1.48倍、传递性是后者的281倍、互惠性是后者的86倍)相比,Instagram网络更密集(互联性更强)、更活跃。Instagram和TikTok网络都包含异性恋关系(即来自亚洲、北美和欧洲等不同地理区域的网红相互连接),这表明来自不同地理区域的网红参与(评论)彼此的内容,可能会让观众接触到各种各样的电子烟内容。推广电子烟并发布有关生活方式话题(如健身、时尚、游戏)的网红在Instagram和TikTok网络中占据了比主要关注电子烟推广的网红更重要的位置,这可能会让对烟草相关内容不感兴趣的用户接触到有害的电子烟图像。研究结果强调,有必要加强对年轻人流行的社交媒体平台上的网红营销监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worldwide connections of influencers who promote e-cigarettes on Instagram and TikTok: A social network analysis
Exposure to e-cigarette marketing on social media is a risk factor for e-cigarette use among youth. Tobacco brands use influencers to promote e-cigarettes on social media; however, influencer marketing has not been sufficiently studied. This study explored network connections and interactions through comments on social media posts between global nano- and micro-influencers (influencers with approximately 1,000 to 100,000 followers) and their audiences on Instagram and TikTok. We constructed directed unipartite networks among Instagram (N = 104) and TikTok (N = 100) influencers and users on Instagram (N = 55,622) and TikTok (N = 68,673) who commented on these influencers' posts in 2021–2022 (including influencers who commented on each other's posts). Comments to posts of users who were not classified as influencers were not collected. The Instagram network was denser (more interconnected) and more active compared to the TikTok network (1.48 times as high density, 281 times as high transitivity, and 86 times as high reciprocity). Both Instagram and TikTok networks contained heterophilic ties (i.e., influencers from different geographic regions such as Asia, North America and Europe connected to each other), indicating that influencers from different geographic regions engage with (comment on) each other's content, potentially exposing audiences to a wide variety of e-cigarette content. Influencers who promote e-cigarettes and post about lifestyle topics (e.g., fitness, fashion, gaming) occupy more central positions in the Instagram and TikTok networks than influencers who focus primarily on e-cigarette promotion, potentially exposing users who are not interested in tobacco-related content to harmful imagery of e-cigarettes. The findings emphasize the need for strengthening influencer marketing regulation on social media platforms popular among youth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of a context-aware mobile app with adaptive feedback for promoting behavioral change in problematic smartphone use: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial Modeling misinformation herd immunity from a multi-mechanism integration perspective: The role of selective exposure and echo chamber effect From pixels to perceptions: Predicting video game ratings through reviews and metadata Tell me who its founders are and I'll tell you what your online community looks like: Online community founders' personality and community attributes Making sense of scent: Cultural styles, cognitive schemas, and the situated logic of online perfume reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1