{"title":"用仪器中子活化法结合内标法分析固体样品中的总氟","authors":"Tsutomu Miura","doi":"10.1016/j.talo.2025.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is a valuable technique for quantifying F; however, it is associated with significant measurement uncertainty, which can be reduced by combining INAA with the internal standard method. In this study, known amounts of Sc were added to both samples and calibration standards to compensate for variations in the fluence rates of the irradiated neutrons and measurements of the γ-rays. The <sup>46m</sup>Sc produced during neutron irradiation was used as the internal standard. Data were collected using two approaches: a single irradiation for 5 s followed by a 10 s γ-ray measurement, and a cyclic method involving five repetitions of the single irradiation and γ-ray measurements. Normalization of the counting rate using the internal standard effectively eliminated day-to-day variations, and a reliable relationship was established between the normalized signal and the amount of F. The proposed method produced a robust and highly linear calibration plot, enabling the accurate quantification of the mass fraction of F. The analytical performance of the proposed method was validated using certified reference materials before using it to quantify the mass fraction of F in commercially available synthetic polymer resins. The cyclic irradiation method, which required approximately 30 min for measurement, yielded a lower expanded uncertainty in the mass fraction of F compared with the single irradiation method, in which measurements were completed within 30 s. Consequently, the single irradiation method was more suitable for screening, whereas the cyclic irradiation method was more suitable for the precise quantification of F.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":436,"journal":{"name":"Talanta Open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total fluorine analysis in solid samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis coupled with the internal standard method\",\"authors\":\"Tsutomu Miura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.talo.2025.100409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is a valuable technique for quantifying F; however, it is associated with significant measurement uncertainty, which can be reduced by combining INAA with the internal standard method. In this study, known amounts of Sc were added to both samples and calibration standards to compensate for variations in the fluence rates of the irradiated neutrons and measurements of the γ-rays. The <sup>46m</sup>Sc produced during neutron irradiation was used as the internal standard. Data were collected using two approaches: a single irradiation for 5 s followed by a 10 s γ-ray measurement, and a cyclic method involving five repetitions of the single irradiation and γ-ray measurements. Normalization of the counting rate using the internal standard effectively eliminated day-to-day variations, and a reliable relationship was established between the normalized signal and the amount of F. The proposed method produced a robust and highly linear calibration plot, enabling the accurate quantification of the mass fraction of F. The analytical performance of the proposed method was validated using certified reference materials before using it to quantify the mass fraction of F in commercially available synthetic polymer resins. The cyclic irradiation method, which required approximately 30 min for measurement, yielded a lower expanded uncertainty in the mass fraction of F compared with the single irradiation method, in which measurements were completed within 30 s. Consequently, the single irradiation method was more suitable for screening, whereas the cyclic irradiation method was more suitable for the precise quantification of F.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Talanta Open\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Talanta Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831925000128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Talanta Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666831925000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
仪器中子活化分析(INAA)是一种有价值的定量分析方法。然而,它与显著的测量不确定度相关,可以通过将INAA与内标法相结合来降低测量不确定度。在本研究中,在样品和校准标准中都添加了已知数量的Sc,以补偿辐照中子的影响率和γ射线测量值的变化。中子辐照过程中产生的46mSc作为内标。数据收集采用两种方法:单次辐照5 s,然后进行10 s γ射线测量,以及循环法,包括5次重复的单次辐照和γ射线测量。使用内标准对计数率进行归一化,有效地消除了日常变化,并在归一化信号与f的量之间建立了可靠的关系。在使用该方法定量市售合成聚合物树脂中F的质量分数之前,使用经过认证的标准物质验证了该方法的分析性能。循环辐照法的测量时间约为30分钟,与单次辐照法相比,F质量分数的扩展不确定度较低,单次辐照法的测量时间在30秒内完成。因此,单次辐照法更适合筛选,而循环辐照法更适合F的精确定量。
Total fluorine analysis in solid samples by instrumental neutron activation analysis coupled with the internal standard method
Instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) is a valuable technique for quantifying F; however, it is associated with significant measurement uncertainty, which can be reduced by combining INAA with the internal standard method. In this study, known amounts of Sc were added to both samples and calibration standards to compensate for variations in the fluence rates of the irradiated neutrons and measurements of the γ-rays. The 46mSc produced during neutron irradiation was used as the internal standard. Data were collected using two approaches: a single irradiation for 5 s followed by a 10 s γ-ray measurement, and a cyclic method involving five repetitions of the single irradiation and γ-ray measurements. Normalization of the counting rate using the internal standard effectively eliminated day-to-day variations, and a reliable relationship was established between the normalized signal and the amount of F. The proposed method produced a robust and highly linear calibration plot, enabling the accurate quantification of the mass fraction of F. The analytical performance of the proposed method was validated using certified reference materials before using it to quantify the mass fraction of F in commercially available synthetic polymer resins. The cyclic irradiation method, which required approximately 30 min for measurement, yielded a lower expanded uncertainty in the mass fraction of F compared with the single irradiation method, in which measurements were completed within 30 s. Consequently, the single irradiation method was more suitable for screening, whereas the cyclic irradiation method was more suitable for the precise quantification of F.