上海滨江生态廊道水陆衔接设置材料类型对土壤细菌群落结构的影响

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107501
Wei Guan , Songshuo Li , Qing Wang , Chenyan Sha , Jinghua Su , Min Wang , Ming Nie , Meng Lu
{"title":"上海滨江生态廊道水陆衔接设置材料类型对土壤细菌群落结构的影响","authors":"Wei Guan ,&nbsp;Songshuo Li ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Chenyan Sha ,&nbsp;Jinghua Su ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Nie ,&nbsp;Meng Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of accelerated global urbanization, the construction of urban riverside ecological corridors increases the aesthetics of cities as well as people's recreational experience. The setup of water-land junction from different materials in riverside ecological corridors may have effects on the soil physicochemical properties and the structure of bacterial communities. Despite their relevance and importance to human well-being, urban soil microbes of riverside ecological corridors are poorly understood. In this study, the two most common material types of water-land junction in Shanghai, natural soil and artificial concrete are selected for the comparison. The results showed that natural soil water-land junction had a higher soil water content, organic carbon and total nitrogen than artificial concrete due to the influence of the river. Meanwhile, the difference of soil properties between the two types junctions is more obvious in topsoil and near river areas. The artificial concrete junction had a higher homogeneity among its own sites due to the obstruction of material-energy exchange between water and land, with only variations in pH and soil bulk density. Therefore, there are significant differences in the bacterial composition and structure of the sites between the two types of corridors, especially in the abundance of Actinomycetales, Rhizobiales, Gaiellales, etc., which are more sensitive to soil moisture and nutrients. In general, according to our analysis, natural soil water-land junction corridors are superior to artificial concrete from the perspective of soil ecology, which can provide a certain scientific basis for urban waterside managers and corridor builders in terms of urbanization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107501"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of materials types of water-land junction settings on soil bacterial community structure in Shanghai riverside ecological corridor\",\"authors\":\"Wei Guan ,&nbsp;Songshuo Li ,&nbsp;Qing Wang ,&nbsp;Chenyan Sha ,&nbsp;Jinghua Su ,&nbsp;Min Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Nie ,&nbsp;Meng Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the context of accelerated global urbanization, the construction of urban riverside ecological corridors increases the aesthetics of cities as well as people's recreational experience. The setup of water-land junction from different materials in riverside ecological corridors may have effects on the soil physicochemical properties and the structure of bacterial communities. Despite their relevance and importance to human well-being, urban soil microbes of riverside ecological corridors are poorly understood. In this study, the two most common material types of water-land junction in Shanghai, natural soil and artificial concrete are selected for the comparison. The results showed that natural soil water-land junction had a higher soil water content, organic carbon and total nitrogen than artificial concrete due to the influence of the river. Meanwhile, the difference of soil properties between the two types junctions is more obvious in topsoil and near river areas. The artificial concrete junction had a higher homogeneity among its own sites due to the obstruction of material-energy exchange between water and land, with only variations in pH and soil bulk density. Therefore, there are significant differences in the bacterial composition and structure of the sites between the two types of corridors, especially in the abundance of Actinomycetales, Rhizobiales, Gaiellales, etc., which are more sensitive to soil moisture and nutrients. In general, according to our analysis, natural soil water-land junction corridors are superior to artificial concrete from the perspective of soil ecology, which can provide a certain scientific basis for urban waterside managers and corridor builders in terms of urbanization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107501\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003264\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球城市化加速的背景下,城市滨江生态廊道的建设增加了城市的审美,也增加了人们的休闲体验。河滨生态廊道中不同材质的水陆交汇处设置可能对土壤理化性质和细菌群落结构产生影响。尽管河滨生态廊道的城市土壤微生物对人类福祉具有相关性和重要性,但人们对其了解甚少。本研究选取了上海地区最常见的两种水陆结合部材料类型——天然土壤和人工混凝土进行对比。结果表明:受河流的影响,天然土壤水陆结合部土壤含水量、有机碳和总氮均高于人工混凝土;同时,表土和临河地区两类连接点的土壤性质差异更为明显。人工混凝土节点由于阻碍了水与土地之间的物质-能量交换,其自身站点之间的均匀性较高,只有pH和土壤容重的变化。因此,两种廊道站址的细菌组成和结构存在显著差异,特别是放线菌、根瘤菌、盖菌等对土壤水分和养分更为敏感的菌群丰度差异较大。总的来说,根据我们的分析,从土壤生态学的角度来看,天然土壤水陆交汇廊道优于人工混凝土,这可以为城市水边管理者和城市化廊道建设者提供一定的科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of materials types of water-land junction settings on soil bacterial community structure in Shanghai riverside ecological corridor
In the context of accelerated global urbanization, the construction of urban riverside ecological corridors increases the aesthetics of cities as well as people's recreational experience. The setup of water-land junction from different materials in riverside ecological corridors may have effects on the soil physicochemical properties and the structure of bacterial communities. Despite their relevance and importance to human well-being, urban soil microbes of riverside ecological corridors are poorly understood. In this study, the two most common material types of water-land junction in Shanghai, natural soil and artificial concrete are selected for the comparison. The results showed that natural soil water-land junction had a higher soil water content, organic carbon and total nitrogen than artificial concrete due to the influence of the river. Meanwhile, the difference of soil properties between the two types junctions is more obvious in topsoil and near river areas. The artificial concrete junction had a higher homogeneity among its own sites due to the obstruction of material-energy exchange between water and land, with only variations in pH and soil bulk density. Therefore, there are significant differences in the bacterial composition and structure of the sites between the two types of corridors, especially in the abundance of Actinomycetales, Rhizobiales, Gaiellales, etc., which are more sensitive to soil moisture and nutrients. In general, according to our analysis, natural soil water-land junction corridors are superior to artificial concrete from the perspective of soil ecology, which can provide a certain scientific basis for urban waterside managers and corridor builders in terms of urbanization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
A planning framework for restoring resilient ecological networks in karst regions: Multi-objective configuration and geological resistance modification in the Qianzhong Urban Agglomeration, Guizhou, China Degradation-dependent mitigation of nitrogen-induced community destabilization by phosphorus addition in alpine grasslands Review of the removal and impact mechanisms and long-term management of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in constructed wetlands A study of pilot Sludge Treatment Reed Beds for the dewatering of surplus activated sludge from a winery wastewater treatment plant Effects of ecological restoration measures on phosphorus fractions in cut slope soils of the Western Sichuan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1