气候变化、管理措施和土地利用对内蒙古植被动态的中长期独立贡献及对生态恢复的启示

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107504
Yongguang Zhai , Yasong Wang , Lei Hao , Wenchao Qi
{"title":"气候变化、管理措施和土地利用对内蒙古植被动态的中长期独立贡献及对生态恢复的启示","authors":"Yongguang Zhai ,&nbsp;Yasong Wang ,&nbsp;Lei Hao ,&nbsp;Wenchao Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To counteract the detrimental impacts of vegetation degradation, the Chinese authorities have initiated numerous ecological restoration projects (ERPs) in Inner Mongolia (IM) since the 1990s. However, the medium- and long-term consequences of these ERPs on vegetation dynamics remain uncertain. This study employed net primary production (NPP) as an indicator to quantify the independent contribution of climate change, management measures and land conversion to vegetation dynamics through scenario modeling over four six-year periods (2001–2006, 2006–2011, 2011–2016, 2016–2021). The findings of the study indicated that human activities were the main driver of changes in NPP in Inner Mongolia across all three six-year periods (2006–2011, 2011–2016 and 2016–2021), with the exception of the period from 2001 to 2006,during which climate change was identified as the dominant factor in this period. The primary variables influencing the net primary production (NPP) of diverse vegetation types, including grassland, crops, and forests, have undergone notable shifts over time. Nevertheless, human activities have consistently been the primary driver of NPP changes in desert ecosystems. During the study period, the observed increase in NPP of IM vegetation was primarily attributable to the implementation of management measures in human activities. This phenomenon was observed consistently across the three main vegetation classes: grassland, forest and desert. In contrast, land conversion was identified as the primary driver of the increase in NPP in cropland during the periods 2001–2006 and 2011–2016. This understanding is crucial for the development of more effective policies and measures for ecological restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107504"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medium- and long-term independent contributions of climate change, management measures and land conversion to vegetation dynamics and inspiration for ecological restoration in Inner Mongolia, China\",\"authors\":\"Yongguang Zhai ,&nbsp;Yasong Wang ,&nbsp;Lei Hao ,&nbsp;Wenchao Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To counteract the detrimental impacts of vegetation degradation, the Chinese authorities have initiated numerous ecological restoration projects (ERPs) in Inner Mongolia (IM) since the 1990s. However, the medium- and long-term consequences of these ERPs on vegetation dynamics remain uncertain. This study employed net primary production (NPP) as an indicator to quantify the independent contribution of climate change, management measures and land conversion to vegetation dynamics through scenario modeling over four six-year periods (2001–2006, 2006–2011, 2011–2016, 2016–2021). The findings of the study indicated that human activities were the main driver of changes in NPP in Inner Mongolia across all three six-year periods (2006–2011, 2011–2016 and 2016–2021), with the exception of the period from 2001 to 2006,during which climate change was identified as the dominant factor in this period. The primary variables influencing the net primary production (NPP) of diverse vegetation types, including grassland, crops, and forests, have undergone notable shifts over time. Nevertheless, human activities have consistently been the primary driver of NPP changes in desert ecosystems. During the study period, the observed increase in NPP of IM vegetation was primarily attributable to the implementation of management measures in human activities. This phenomenon was observed consistently across the three main vegetation classes: grassland, forest and desert. In contrast, land conversion was identified as the primary driver of the increase in NPP in cropland during the periods 2001–2006 and 2011–2016. This understanding is crucial for the development of more effective policies and measures for ecological restoration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742400329X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092585742400329X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了抵消植被退化的不利影响,自20世纪90年代以来,中国当局在内蒙古启动了许多生态恢复项目(ERPs)。然而,这些erp对植被动态的中长期影响仍不确定。本研究以净初级生产力(NPP)为指标,通过4个6年期(2001-2006年、2006-2011年、2011-2016年、2016-2021年)的情景模拟,量化了气候变化、管理措施和土地利用对植被动态的独立贡献。结果表明,人类活动是2006 - 2011年、2011-2016年和2016-2021年3个6年期间内蒙古NPP变化的主要驱动因素,但2001 - 2006年期间气候变化被确定为主导因素。随着时间的推移,影响草地、农作物和森林等不同植被类型净初级产量(NPP)的主要变量发生了显著变化。然而,人类活动一直是沙漠生态系统NPP变化的主要驱动力。研究期间,IM植被NPP的增加主要归因于人类活动管理措施的实施。这一现象在草地、森林和沙漠这三种主要植被类别中都得到了一致的观察。相比之下,在2001-2006年和2011-2016年期间,土地转换被确定为农田NPP增加的主要驱动因素。这一认识对于制定更有效的生态恢复政策和措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medium- and long-term independent contributions of climate change, management measures and land conversion to vegetation dynamics and inspiration for ecological restoration in Inner Mongolia, China
To counteract the detrimental impacts of vegetation degradation, the Chinese authorities have initiated numerous ecological restoration projects (ERPs) in Inner Mongolia (IM) since the 1990s. However, the medium- and long-term consequences of these ERPs on vegetation dynamics remain uncertain. This study employed net primary production (NPP) as an indicator to quantify the independent contribution of climate change, management measures and land conversion to vegetation dynamics through scenario modeling over four six-year periods (2001–2006, 2006–2011, 2011–2016, 2016–2021). The findings of the study indicated that human activities were the main driver of changes in NPP in Inner Mongolia across all three six-year periods (2006–2011, 2011–2016 and 2016–2021), with the exception of the period from 2001 to 2006,during which climate change was identified as the dominant factor in this period. The primary variables influencing the net primary production (NPP) of diverse vegetation types, including grassland, crops, and forests, have undergone notable shifts over time. Nevertheless, human activities have consistently been the primary driver of NPP changes in desert ecosystems. During the study period, the observed increase in NPP of IM vegetation was primarily attributable to the implementation of management measures in human activities. This phenomenon was observed consistently across the three main vegetation classes: grassland, forest and desert. In contrast, land conversion was identified as the primary driver of the increase in NPP in cropland during the periods 2001–2006 and 2011–2016. This understanding is crucial for the development of more effective policies and measures for ecological restoration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
A planning framework for restoring resilient ecological networks in karst regions: Multi-objective configuration and geological resistance modification in the Qianzhong Urban Agglomeration, Guizhou, China Restoring ecosystem services in mature salt marshes through topsoil removal Synergistic remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil using compost-immobilized laccase and Medicago sativa L Bioretention system infiltration: Insights into temporal evolution and impacts of design parameters A Species distribution modelling approach to evaluate the resilience of soil bioengineering solutions for slope stabilization under future climate scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1