拦洪坝对底栖无脊椎动物的影响:通过影响河床大小和水库及下游断面的扰动

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107509
Ryota Nakamura, Sohei Kobayashi, Sameh Ahmed Kantoush, Tetsuya Sumi
{"title":"拦洪坝对底栖无脊椎动物的影响:通过影响河床大小和水库及下游断面的扰动","authors":"Ryota Nakamura,&nbsp;Sohei Kobayashi,&nbsp;Sameh Ahmed Kantoush,&nbsp;Tetsuya Sumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The impacts of Flood Retention Dams (FRDs), designed solely for flood control and featuring bottom outlets at the riverbed level, on benthic invertebrate communities have not been sufficiently elucidated. This study investigated the impact of FRDs on benthic invertebrate communities downstream and reservoirs, focusing on differences in riverbed conditions and bed disturbances caused by reservoir sedimentation. We compared benthic invertebrate communities and riverbed conditions at upstream, reservoir, and downstream sites from seven FRDs in Japan. The average community similarity between the upstream and downstream sites across the seven dams was 0.73, comparable to unregulated streams. They were not related to the duration of dam operation, indicating minimal long-term impacts on downstream communities. However, the community similarity between the upstream and reservoir sites was notably lower, at 0.66. Reservoir sites had smaller grain sizes and softer substrates with narrower interstitial spaces than upstream sites. Consequently, taxes that inhabit or move across stone surfaces were more common in reservoirs. Conversely, taxa that prefer stable beds and larger body sizes were less frequent. Additionally, we found that reservoir sedimentation fluctuations, which indicates riverbed disturbance pattern, influence the similarity of invertebrate communities between upstream and downstream sites. To conclude, FRDs have negligible impacts on benthic invertebrate communities at DS sites; smaller grain sizes modulate these communities at RS sites. Predicting reservoir sedimentation fluctuations supports the design of FRDs with minimal impacts on benthic invertebrates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of flood retention dams on benthic invertebrates by affecting bed material size and disturbance in reservoir and downstream sections\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Nakamura,&nbsp;Sohei Kobayashi,&nbsp;Sameh Ahmed Kantoush,&nbsp;Tetsuya Sumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The impacts of Flood Retention Dams (FRDs), designed solely for flood control and featuring bottom outlets at the riverbed level, on benthic invertebrate communities have not been sufficiently elucidated. This study investigated the impact of FRDs on benthic invertebrate communities downstream and reservoirs, focusing on differences in riverbed conditions and bed disturbances caused by reservoir sedimentation. We compared benthic invertebrate communities and riverbed conditions at upstream, reservoir, and downstream sites from seven FRDs in Japan. The average community similarity between the upstream and downstream sites across the seven dams was 0.73, comparable to unregulated streams. They were not related to the duration of dam operation, indicating minimal long-term impacts on downstream communities. However, the community similarity between the upstream and reservoir sites was notably lower, at 0.66. Reservoir sites had smaller grain sizes and softer substrates with narrower interstitial spaces than upstream sites. Consequently, taxes that inhabit or move across stone surfaces were more common in reservoirs. Conversely, taxa that prefer stable beds and larger body sizes were less frequent. Additionally, we found that reservoir sedimentation fluctuations, which indicates riverbed disturbance pattern, influence the similarity of invertebrate communities between upstream and downstream sites. To conclude, FRDs have negligible impacts on benthic invertebrate communities at DS sites; smaller grain sizes modulate these communities at RS sites. Predicting reservoir sedimentation fluctuations supports the design of FRDs with minimal impacts on benthic invertebrates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003343\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424003343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仅为防洪而设计的拦洪水坝(FRDs)在河床水平设有底部出口,对底栖无脊椎动物群落的影响尚未得到充分阐明。本研究探讨了淡水灾害对下游和水库底栖无脊椎动物群落的影响,重点研究了河床条件的差异和水库沉积引起的河床扰动。我们比较了日本7个河流保护区上游、水库和下游地点的底栖无脊椎动物群落和河床条件。七座大坝的上游和下游站点之间的平均群落相似性为0.73,与不受管制的河流相当。它们与大坝运行时间无关,表明对下游社区的长期影响最小。上游与水库样地的群落相似度较低,为0.66。水库遗址比上游遗址粒度更小,基质更软,间隙更窄。因此,在岩石表面栖息或移动的税种在水库中更为常见。相反,喜欢稳定床层和较大体型的类群较少出现。此外,我们发现水库沉降波动反映了河床扰动模式,影响了上游和下游站点之间无脊椎动物群落的相似性。综上所述,保护区对底栖无脊椎动物群落的影响可以忽略不计;较小的颗粒尺寸调节了RS站点的这些群落。预测水库沉降波动有助于在对底栖无脊椎动物影响最小的情况下设计frd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impacts of flood retention dams on benthic invertebrates by affecting bed material size and disturbance in reservoir and downstream sections
The impacts of Flood Retention Dams (FRDs), designed solely for flood control and featuring bottom outlets at the riverbed level, on benthic invertebrate communities have not been sufficiently elucidated. This study investigated the impact of FRDs on benthic invertebrate communities downstream and reservoirs, focusing on differences in riverbed conditions and bed disturbances caused by reservoir sedimentation. We compared benthic invertebrate communities and riverbed conditions at upstream, reservoir, and downstream sites from seven FRDs in Japan. The average community similarity between the upstream and downstream sites across the seven dams was 0.73, comparable to unregulated streams. They were not related to the duration of dam operation, indicating minimal long-term impacts on downstream communities. However, the community similarity between the upstream and reservoir sites was notably lower, at 0.66. Reservoir sites had smaller grain sizes and softer substrates with narrower interstitial spaces than upstream sites. Consequently, taxes that inhabit or move across stone surfaces were more common in reservoirs. Conversely, taxa that prefer stable beds and larger body sizes were less frequent. Additionally, we found that reservoir sedimentation fluctuations, which indicates riverbed disturbance pattern, influence the similarity of invertebrate communities between upstream and downstream sites. To conclude, FRDs have negligible impacts on benthic invertebrate communities at DS sites; smaller grain sizes modulate these communities at RS sites. Predicting reservoir sedimentation fluctuations supports the design of FRDs with minimal impacts on benthic invertebrates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
A planning framework for restoring resilient ecological networks in karst regions: Multi-objective configuration and geological resistance modification in the Qianzhong Urban Agglomeration, Guizhou, China Restoring ecosystem services in mature salt marshes through topsoil removal Synergistic remediation of petroleum-contaminated soil using compost-immobilized laccase and Medicago sativa L Bioretention system infiltration: Insights into temporal evolution and impacts of design parameters A Species distribution modelling approach to evaluate the resilience of soil bioengineering solutions for slope stabilization under future climate scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1