Brad Martin , Charlie Huveneers , Simon Reeves , Ryan Baring
{"title":"恢复贝类礁的社会生态历史,用于现代管理和恢复","authors":"Brad Martin , Charlie Huveneers , Simon Reeves , Ryan Baring","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (<em>Ostrea angasi</em>), razor clam (<em>Pinna bicolor</em>), and hammer oyster (<em>Malleus meridianus</em>) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising >2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 107540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviving shellfish reef socio-ecological histories for modern management and restoration\",\"authors\":\"Brad Martin , Charlie Huveneers , Simon Reeves , Ryan Baring\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (<em>Ostrea angasi</em>), razor clam (<em>Pinna bicolor</em>), and hammer oyster (<em>Malleus meridianus</em>) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising >2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096456912500002X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096456912500002X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reviving shellfish reef socio-ecological histories for modern management and restoration
Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (Ostrea angasi), razor clam (Pinna bicolor), and hammer oyster (Malleus meridianus) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising >2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.