恢复贝类礁的社会生态历史,用于现代管理和恢复

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107540
Brad Martin , Charlie Huveneers , Simon Reeves , Ryan Baring
{"title":"恢复贝类礁的社会生态历史,用于现代管理和恢复","authors":"Brad Martin ,&nbsp;Charlie Huveneers ,&nbsp;Simon Reeves ,&nbsp;Ryan Baring","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (<em>Ostrea angasi</em>), razor clam (<em>Pinna bicolor</em>), and hammer oyster (<em>Malleus meridianus</em>) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising &gt;2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 107540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviving shellfish reef socio-ecological histories for modern management and restoration\",\"authors\":\"Brad Martin ,&nbsp;Charlie Huveneers ,&nbsp;Simon Reeves ,&nbsp;Ryan Baring\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (<em>Ostrea angasi</em>), razor clam (<em>Pinna bicolor</em>), and hammer oyster (<em>Malleus meridianus</em>) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising &gt;2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096456912500002X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096456912500002X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的三个世纪里,沿海资源的开发和管理发生了重大变化,与此同时,全球自然生态系统及其社会生态服务功能也在下降。贝类生态系统在全球温带和热带沿海生态系统中遭受了巨大的衰退。由于人们越来越意识到贝类珊瑚礁的丧失及其生态重要性,恢复贝类珊瑚礁的努力也在增加。然而,成功的保护需要对生态系统特征、压力源和社会文化支持有充分的了解。反过来,这些信息可以支持海岸管理,恢复目标,并有助于促进利益相关者的支持。然而,由于生态制度的变化和知识来源的分散,建立证据基础可能是困难的。在这里,综合了来自不同文献记录的数据,以综合南澳大利亚过去贝类生态系统的分布、管理和社会生态服务。具体而言,我们比较了平牡蛎(Ostrea angasi),蛏子(Pinna bicolor)和锤牡蛎(Malleus meridianus)生态系统的现有记录及其共生。根据历史记录,我们记录了140个潜在的贝类礁位置,这些生态系统以前在南澳大利亚沿海水域的2630平方公里。本综述还整理了在欧洲殖民影响之前和之后有关贝类捕捞的文献。我们估计,在1849年至1915年间,在20世纪40年代它们的功能灭绝之前,全州范围内有超过4300万只扁平牡蛎被商业捕捞。平牡蛎礁的减少促使南澳大利亚最早的渔业立法(1853年)和海洋恢复努力,包括渔业关闭(1875年),贝类迁移(1887年)和海洋保护区(1912年)。历史记录表明,由于破坏性底栖生物捕捞活动、环境压力因素和海洋资源管理变化的累积影响,贝类礁在过去约200年里逐渐减少。通过重建过去的贝类珊瑚礁分布和社会文化联系,本综述确定了基于证据的机会和关键知识缺口,以指导未来的研究和管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reviving shellfish reef socio-ecological histories for modern management and restoration
Significant changes in the exploitation and management of coastal resources over the past three centuries have coincided with global declines in natural ecosystems and their socio-ecological services. Shellfish ecosystems have suffered enormous declines across temperate and tropical coastal ecosystems worldwide. Efforts to restore shellfish reefs have increased due to growing awareness of their loss and ecological importance. However, successful conservation requires robust knowledge of ecosystem characteristics, stressors, and socio-cultural support. In turn, this information can underpin coastal management, restoration targets, and help foster stakeholder support. Establishing evidence-bases can, however, be difficult due to ecological regime shifts and fragmented knowledge sources. Here, data from diverse literature records were integrated to synthesise South Australia's past shellfish ecosystem distribution, management, and socio-ecological services. Specifically, we contrasted available accounts of flat oyster (Ostrea angasi), razor clam (Pinna bicolor), and hammer oyster (Malleus meridianus) ecosystems, and their co-occurrence. Based on historical records, we documented 140 potential shellfish reef locations, with these ecosystems previously characterising >2630 square kilometres of South Australia's coastal waters. This review also collates literature concerning shellfish harvesting, both prior to, and following European colonial influence. We estimate that over 43 million flat oysters were commercially harvested statewide between 1849 and 1915, prior to their functional extinction by the 1940s. Flat oyster reef declines motivated South Australia's earliest fisheries legislation (est. 1853) and marine restoration efforts, including fishery closures (est. 1875), shellfish translocation (est. 1887), and marine reserves (est. 1912). Historical records indicate that shellfish reefs, of multiple ecosystem-forming bivalves, diminished over the past ≈200 years due to cumulative impacts of destructive benthic fishing practices, environmental stressors, and changes in marine resource management. By reconstructing past shellfish reef distributions and socio-cultural connections, this review identifies evidence-based opportunities and key knowledge gaps to guide future research and management efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Green competition at sea: Dynamic modeling of alternative fuel adoption and fleet competitiveness Co-created citizen science as an approach to sustainable coastal monitoring and governance Impacts of multilateral trade facilitation policy on non-indigenous species spread risk and economic outcomes Beach law in the anthropocene Prediction and interpretation of vessel transit time through port breakwaters using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1