负面企业社会责任事件的供应链传染效应:股票市场反应视角

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101080
Jinyan Shi , Mengzhu Deng , Jimeng Yang , Rongjia Zhang
{"title":"负面企业社会责任事件的供应链传染效应:股票市场反应视角","authors":"Jinyan Shi ,&nbsp;Mengzhu Deng ,&nbsp;Jimeng Yang ,&nbsp;Rongjia Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) events substantially expose supply chains to risk. Understanding the effects of such events on suppliers and customers is crucial for strengthening the resilience of supply chain systems. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2021, we employ the event study method to demonstrate that negative CSR events create a contagion effect in supply chains. Such contagion effect is asymmetric, affecting the capital market performance of customers more negatively than it does that of suppliers. Further analysis indicates that both the closeness of supply chain relationships and the level of economic policy uncertainty reinforce the contagion effect. The mechanism analysis suggests that the contagion effect originates from the damaged reputation of suppliers or customers and the reduction in shared investment value. In addition, the contagion effect is stronger when the core company is nonstate-owned and has a lower social responsibility score. These findings contribute to the understanding of CSR contagion effects from the perspective of supply chain relationships. Meanwhile, our study highlights that companies can focus on CSR events to strengthen their supply chain CSR management and improve the overall security and stability of supply chain systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101080"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain contagion effects of negative CSR events: A stock market reaction perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jinyan Shi ,&nbsp;Mengzhu Deng ,&nbsp;Jimeng Yang ,&nbsp;Rongjia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) events substantially expose supply chains to risk. Understanding the effects of such events on suppliers and customers is crucial for strengthening the resilience of supply chain systems. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2021, we employ the event study method to demonstrate that negative CSR events create a contagion effect in supply chains. Such contagion effect is asymmetric, affecting the capital market performance of customers more negatively than it does that of suppliers. Further analysis indicates that both the closeness of supply chain relationships and the level of economic policy uncertainty reinforce the contagion effect. The mechanism analysis suggests that the contagion effect originates from the damaged reputation of suppliers or customers and the reduction in shared investment value. In addition, the contagion effect is stronger when the core company is nonstate-owned and has a lower social responsibility score. These findings contribute to the understanding of CSR contagion effects from the perspective of supply chain relationships. Meanwhile, our study highlights that companies can focus on CSR events to strengthen their supply chain CSR management and improve the overall security and stability of supply chain systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325000079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325000079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

负面的企业社会责任(CSR)事件实质上暴露了供应链的风险。了解此类事件对供应商和客户的影响对于加强供应链系统的弹性至关重要。本文以2016 - 2021年中国a股上市公司为样本,运用事件研究方法,论证了企业社会责任负面事件在供应链中产生传染效应。这种传染效应是不对称的,对客户资本市场绩效的负面影响大于对供应商资本市场绩效的负面影响。进一步分析表明,供应链关系的密切程度和经济政策的不确定性水平都强化了传染效应。机制分析表明,传染效应源于供应商或客户声誉受损和共同投资价值减少。此外,当核心企业是非国有企业且社会责任得分较低时,传染效应更强。这些发现有助于从供应链关系的角度理解企业社会责任的传染效应。同时,我们的研究强调企业可以通过关注CSR事件来加强供应链CSR管理,提高供应链系统的整体安全性和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supply chain contagion effects of negative CSR events: A stock market reaction perspective
Negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) events substantially expose supply chains to risk. Understanding the effects of such events on suppliers and customers is crucial for strengthening the resilience of supply chain systems. Using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2016 to 2021, we employ the event study method to demonstrate that negative CSR events create a contagion effect in supply chains. Such contagion effect is asymmetric, affecting the capital market performance of customers more negatively than it does that of suppliers. Further analysis indicates that both the closeness of supply chain relationships and the level of economic policy uncertainty reinforce the contagion effect. The mechanism analysis suggests that the contagion effect originates from the damaged reputation of suppliers or customers and the reduction in shared investment value. In addition, the contagion effect is stronger when the core company is nonstate-owned and has a lower social responsibility score. These findings contribute to the understanding of CSR contagion effects from the perspective of supply chain relationships. Meanwhile, our study highlights that companies can focus on CSR events to strengthen their supply chain CSR management and improve the overall security and stability of supply chain systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Marital dividend: How CEO marriage drives long-term investor value appropriation Monitoring roles of CEO-directors: Evidence from corporate misconduct Shock transmission among green financial instruments and major financial assets and commodities in China: A quantile connectedness analysis Fiscal monitoring policy and corporate social responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1