加强蒸汽气化的预测模型:化学计量学、平衡、数据驱动和混合方法的比较研究

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115151
Juan Moreno , Martha Cobo , Felipe Buendia , Nestor Sánchez
{"title":"加强蒸汽气化的预测模型:化学计量学、平衡、数据驱动和混合方法的比较研究","authors":"Juan Moreno ,&nbsp;Martha Cobo ,&nbsp;Felipe Buendia ,&nbsp;Nestor Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Steam gasification offers a pathway to generate synthesis gas (syngas) rich in hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), a crucial element in efforts to decarbonize and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, the intricate web of reactions involved in the process demands predictive tools to enable its large-scale application. While models based on stoichiometry, chemical equilibrium, and data algorithms have made strides, previous works lack comprehensive comparative studies on their efficacy and adaptability. This study addresses this gap by developing and juxtaposing four models: stoichiometric, equilibrium-based, data-driven, and a hybrid approach to forecast steam gasification products against experimental data gleaned from a systematic literature review. Among these models, the hybrid variant emerges as the most accurate in predicting syngas composition, boasting an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.63 and an average R<sup>2</sup> of 0.59. Moreover, it yields predictions for tar, char, and gas with respective RMSEs of 42.79 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> syngas, 72.99 g/kg biomass, and 0.33 Nm<sup>3</sup> syngas/kg biomass. Notably, the robust validation process of this model enhances its versatility while maintaining commendable prediction accuracy compared to the existing literature. Future enhancements could entail integrating advanced kinetic and equilibrium expressions and incorporating fresh experimental data into the training phases of data-driven models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115151"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing predictive models for steam gasification: A comparative study of stoichiometric, equilibrium, data-driven, and hybrid approaches\",\"authors\":\"Juan Moreno ,&nbsp;Martha Cobo ,&nbsp;Felipe Buendia ,&nbsp;Nestor Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Steam gasification offers a pathway to generate synthesis gas (syngas) rich in hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), a crucial element in efforts to decarbonize and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, the intricate web of reactions involved in the process demands predictive tools to enable its large-scale application. While models based on stoichiometry, chemical equilibrium, and data algorithms have made strides, previous works lack comprehensive comparative studies on their efficacy and adaptability. This study addresses this gap by developing and juxtaposing four models: stoichiometric, equilibrium-based, data-driven, and a hybrid approach to forecast steam gasification products against experimental data gleaned from a systematic literature review. Among these models, the hybrid variant emerges as the most accurate in predicting syngas composition, boasting an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.63 and an average R<sup>2</sup> of 0.59. Moreover, it yields predictions for tar, char, and gas with respective RMSEs of 42.79 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> syngas, 72.99 g/kg biomass, and 0.33 Nm<sup>3</sup> syngas/kg biomass. Notably, the robust validation process of this model enhances its versatility while maintaining commendable prediction accuracy compared to the existing literature. Future enhancements could entail integrating advanced kinetic and equilibrium expressions and incorporating fresh experimental data into the training phases of data-driven models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒸汽气化为产生富含氢的合成气(syngas)提供了一条途径,这是脱碳和减少温室气体排放的关键因素。然而,该过程中涉及的复杂反应网络需要预测工具来实现其大规模应用。虽然基于化学计量学、化学平衡和数据算法的模型取得了长足的进步,但以往的工作缺乏对其有效性和适应性的全面比较研究。本研究通过开发和并列四种模型来解决这一差距:化学计量、基于平衡、数据驱动和混合方法,根据系统文献综述收集的实验数据预测蒸汽气化产品。在这些模型中,混合模型在预测合成气成分方面最准确,平均均方根误差(RMSE)为5.63,平均R2为0.59。此外,它还预测焦油、木炭和天然气的rmse分别为42.79 g/Nm3合成气、72.99 g/kg生物质和0.33 Nm3合成气/kg生物质。值得注意的是,与现有文献相比,该模型的鲁棒验证过程增强了其通用性,同时保持了值得称道的预测精度。未来的改进可能需要整合先进的动力学和平衡表达式,并将新的实验数据纳入数据驱动模型的训练阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing predictive models for steam gasification: A comparative study of stoichiometric, equilibrium, data-driven, and hybrid approaches
Steam gasification offers a pathway to generate synthesis gas (syngas) rich in hydrogen (H2), a crucial element in efforts to decarbonize and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, the intricate web of reactions involved in the process demands predictive tools to enable its large-scale application. While models based on stoichiometry, chemical equilibrium, and data algorithms have made strides, previous works lack comprehensive comparative studies on their efficacy and adaptability. This study addresses this gap by developing and juxtaposing four models: stoichiometric, equilibrium-based, data-driven, and a hybrid approach to forecast steam gasification products against experimental data gleaned from a systematic literature review. Among these models, the hybrid variant emerges as the most accurate in predicting syngas composition, boasting an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 5.63 and an average R2 of 0.59. Moreover, it yields predictions for tar, char, and gas with respective RMSEs of 42.79 g/Nm3 syngas, 72.99 g/kg biomass, and 0.33 Nm3 syngas/kg biomass. Notably, the robust validation process of this model enhances its versatility while maintaining commendable prediction accuracy compared to the existing literature. Future enhancements could entail integrating advanced kinetic and equilibrium expressions and incorporating fresh experimental data into the training phases of data-driven models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural dynamics of the renewable energy economy: A longitudinal input-output insights for a resilient transition Innovation based on the co-evolution of institutions and firms: An integrative literature review of the electric vehicle transition A scoping review on psychology-driven demand side management: From behavioral insights to energy system flexibility A waste-valorising pathway for circular hydrogen economies Unleashing the potential of carbon dioxide: Advanced cooling strategies for next-generation small-scale high heat-flux electronics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1