住房和社区的生命周期评估:系统回顾

IF 18 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115249
L. Ruiz-Valero , A. Arceo , T. Kesik , M. Touchie , W. O'Brien
{"title":"住房和社区的生命周期评估:系统回顾","authors":"L. Ruiz-Valero ,&nbsp;A. Arceo ,&nbsp;T. Kesik ,&nbsp;M. Touchie ,&nbsp;W. O'Brien","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Housing accounts for a high proportion of our anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and represents a large environmental footprint, particularly when supporting infrastructure and transportation are included. This review introduces three housing life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks, which are distinguished by the spatial scope of analysis and built environment elements included. The choice of housing LCA framework has possible tradeoffs affecting the environmental impact quantification and selection of lower impact housing built form or housing development type. The objective of this systematic review is to compare previous standard housing LCAs, holistic housing LCAs, and neighborhoods LCAs related to the four stages of LCA (goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation). This paper presents quantitative analyses of housing GHG emissions from the reviewed studies which indicate that standard housing LCA underestimates average GHG emissions by 43 % due to exclusion of mobility, and by 11 % due to exclusion of open spaces, and networks. The interpretation of which housing built form has lower GHG emissions switches between standard and holistic housing LCAs. This review recommends the use of holistic housing and neighborhood LCAs to fully assess the environmental impacts of early-stage housing and neighborhood planning. However, these frameworks require standardization, including functional unit definition, scoping of system boundary, and treatment of temporal uncertainty and variability in housing contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 115249"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of housing and neighbourhoods: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"L. Ruiz-Valero ,&nbsp;A. Arceo ,&nbsp;T. Kesik ,&nbsp;M. Touchie ,&nbsp;W. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Housing accounts for a high proportion of our anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and represents a large environmental footprint, particularly when supporting infrastructure and transportation are included. This review introduces three housing life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks, which are distinguished by the spatial scope of analysis and built environment elements included. The choice of housing LCA framework has possible tradeoffs affecting the environmental impact quantification and selection of lower impact housing built form or housing development type. The objective of this systematic review is to compare previous standard housing LCAs, holistic housing LCAs, and neighborhoods LCAs related to the four stages of LCA (goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation). This paper presents quantitative analyses of housing GHG emissions from the reviewed studies which indicate that standard housing LCA underestimates average GHG emissions by 43 % due to exclusion of mobility, and by 11 % due to exclusion of open spaces, and networks. The interpretation of which housing built form has lower GHG emissions switches between standard and holistic housing LCAs. This review recommends the use of holistic housing and neighborhood LCAs to fully assess the environmental impacts of early-stage housing and neighborhood planning. However, these frameworks require standardization, including functional unit definition, scoping of system boundary, and treatment of temporal uncertainty and variability in housing contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"210 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009754\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124009754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

住房在我们的人为温室气体(GHG)排放中占很大比例,并代表着巨大的环境足迹,特别是在包括配套基础设施和交通在内的情况下。本文介绍了住宅生命周期评估(LCA)的三种框架,它们在分析的空间范围和所包含的建筑环境要素方面有所不同。住房LCA框架的选择可能会影响环境影响量化和选择影响较小的住房建筑形式或住房开发类型。本系统综述的目的是比较以往的标准住房LCA、整体住房LCA和与LCA的四个阶段(目标和范围定义、生命周期清单、影响评估和解释)相关的社区LCA。本文从所回顾的研究中对住房温室气体排放进行了定量分析,结果表明,由于排除了流动性,标准住房LCA低估了平均温室气体排放量43%,由于排除了开放空间和网络,平均温室气体排放量低估了11%。对于哪种住房建筑形式具有较低的温室气体排放的解释在标准住房和整体住房lca之间切换。本综述建议使用整体住房和社区lca来全面评估早期住房和社区规划的环境影响。然而,这些框架需要标准化,包括功能单元定义,系统边界范围,以及处理住房环境中的时间不确定性和可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life cycle assessment of housing and neighbourhoods: A systematic review
Housing accounts for a high proportion of our anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and represents a large environmental footprint, particularly when supporting infrastructure and transportation are included. This review introduces three housing life cycle assessment (LCA) frameworks, which are distinguished by the spatial scope of analysis and built environment elements included. The choice of housing LCA framework has possible tradeoffs affecting the environmental impact quantification and selection of lower impact housing built form or housing development type. The objective of this systematic review is to compare previous standard housing LCAs, holistic housing LCAs, and neighborhoods LCAs related to the four stages of LCA (goal and scope definition, life cycle inventory, impact assessment, and interpretation). This paper presents quantitative analyses of housing GHG emissions from the reviewed studies which indicate that standard housing LCA underestimates average GHG emissions by 43 % due to exclusion of mobility, and by 11 % due to exclusion of open spaces, and networks. The interpretation of which housing built form has lower GHG emissions switches between standard and holistic housing LCAs. This review recommends the use of holistic housing and neighborhood LCAs to fully assess the environmental impacts of early-stage housing and neighborhood planning. However, these frameworks require standardization, including functional unit definition, scoping of system boundary, and treatment of temporal uncertainty and variability in housing contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Structural dynamics of the renewable energy economy: A longitudinal input-output insights for a resilient transition Innovation based on the co-evolution of institutions and firms: An integrative literature review of the electric vehicle transition A scoping review on psychology-driven demand side management: From behavioral insights to energy system flexibility A waste-valorising pathway for circular hydrogen economies Unleashing the potential of carbon dioxide: Advanced cooling strategies for next-generation small-scale high heat-flux electronics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1