网络零售平台自有品牌引入与厂商渠道选择的互动关系

IF 13.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104208
Qihuan Chu, Ziqiong Zhang, Tung-Ju Wu, Zili Zhang
{"title":"网络零售平台自有品牌引入与厂商渠道选择的互动关系","authors":"Qihuan Chu,&nbsp;Ziqiong Zhang,&nbsp;Tung-Ju Wu,&nbsp;Zili Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recently, the issue of whether to introduce private label brands to online retail platforms and the interaction between this decision and manufacturers' channel selection has garnered extensive interest. However, these studies assume that manufacturers exclusively distribute their products through the agency or reselling channels, ignoring the situation where some manufacturers use dual channels. Therefore, we develop a Stackelberg game model to examine the strategic interaction between introducing an online retail platform's private label brand and a manufacturer's channel selection under different pricing strategies. Our findings indicate that introducing private label brands by online retail platforms hurts manufacturers' profits. When manufacturers opt for various pricing strategies, the equilibrium outcomes diverge significantly. Specifically, under the differential pricing strategy, the platform's decision depends on product substitutability, and the manufacturer never chooses the agency mode. Under the uniform pricing strategy, the platform's optimal decision is always to introduce a private label brand, and the manufacturer never chooses the reselling mode. In addition, the analysis demonstrates that platforms that introduce private label brands can alleviate the double marginalization. Our findings provide insights for managers of online retail platforms to decide on introducing private label brands and for manufacturers to make channel selection decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104208"},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction between online retail platforms' private label brand introduction and manufacturers' channel selection\",\"authors\":\"Qihuan Chu,&nbsp;Ziqiong Zhang,&nbsp;Tung-Ju Wu,&nbsp;Zili Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recently, the issue of whether to introduce private label brands to online retail platforms and the interaction between this decision and manufacturers' channel selection has garnered extensive interest. However, these studies assume that manufacturers exclusively distribute their products through the agency or reselling channels, ignoring the situation where some manufacturers use dual channels. Therefore, we develop a Stackelberg game model to examine the strategic interaction between introducing an online retail platform's private label brand and a manufacturer's channel selection under different pricing strategies. Our findings indicate that introducing private label brands by online retail platforms hurts manufacturers' profits. When manufacturers opt for various pricing strategies, the equilibrium outcomes diverge significantly. Specifically, under the differential pricing strategy, the platform's decision depends on product substitutability, and the manufacturer never chooses the agency mode. Under the uniform pricing strategy, the platform's optimal decision is always to introduce a private label brand, and the manufacturer never chooses the reselling mode. In addition, the analysis demonstrates that platforms that introduce private label brands can alleviate the double marginalization. Our findings provide insights for managers of online retail platforms to decide on introducing private label brands and for manufacturers to make channel selection decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924005046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924005046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,是否将自有品牌引入在线零售平台以及这一决定与制造商渠道选择之间的互动问题引起了广泛的关注。然而,这些研究假设制造商只通过代理或转售渠道分销其产品,忽略了一些制造商使用双重渠道的情况。因此,我们建立了一个Stackelberg博弈模型来考察在不同定价策略下,在线零售平台引入自有品牌与制造商渠道选择之间的战略互动关系。我们的研究结果表明,在线零售平台引入自有品牌损害了制造商的利润。当制造商选择不同的定价策略时,均衡结果存在显著差异。具体而言,在差别定价策略下,平台的决策取决于产品的可替代性,制造商从不选择代理模式。在统一定价策略下,平台的最优决策始终是引入自有品牌,制造商从不选择转售模式。此外,分析表明,平台引入自有品牌可以缓解双重边缘化。我们的研究结果为在线零售平台的管理者决定引入自有品牌和制造商做出渠道选择决策提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interaction between online retail platforms' private label brand introduction and manufacturers' channel selection
Recently, the issue of whether to introduce private label brands to online retail platforms and the interaction between this decision and manufacturers' channel selection has garnered extensive interest. However, these studies assume that manufacturers exclusively distribute their products through the agency or reselling channels, ignoring the situation where some manufacturers use dual channels. Therefore, we develop a Stackelberg game model to examine the strategic interaction between introducing an online retail platform's private label brand and a manufacturer's channel selection under different pricing strategies. Our findings indicate that introducing private label brands by online retail platforms hurts manufacturers' profits. When manufacturers opt for various pricing strategies, the equilibrium outcomes diverge significantly. Specifically, under the differential pricing strategy, the platform's decision depends on product substitutability, and the manufacturer never chooses the agency mode. Under the uniform pricing strategy, the platform's optimal decision is always to introduce a private label brand, and the manufacturer never chooses the reselling mode. In addition, the analysis demonstrates that platforms that introduce private label brands can alleviate the double marginalization. Our findings provide insights for managers of online retail platforms to decide on introducing private label brands and for manufacturers to make channel selection decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Beauty framed: How image format and faith shape female consumer responses to attractive model images in Muslim society What drives sustainable consumption behavior? Empirical evidence from a three-stage hybrid analysis incorporating bibliometric, PLS-SEM, and NCA evidence How immersive design features and relational cohesion jointly form consumer game loyalty The beauty premium in online services: Driving trial adoption but not repeat purchases? Evidence from AI-based big data analysis Hierarchical mechanisms of consumer adoption of AI-powered shopping guides: An integrated ISM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and Bayesian Network approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1