人工智能(AI)在近端间龋坏检测中的应用

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.023
Dr. Jennie Caldwell , Mr. Brandon Crowther , Dr. Anita Gohel
{"title":"人工智能(AI)在近端间龋坏检测中的应用","authors":"Dr. Jennie Caldwell ,&nbsp;Mr. Brandon Crowther ,&nbsp;Dr. Anita Gohel","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Untreated caries are a prevalent health condition worldwide. Management of caries includes preventive and restoring teeth and function when necessary. In recent years, significant progress has been made with the introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms in dentistry, which includes diagnosis of incipient and advanced carious lesions. The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Overjet Caries Assist (OCA), a radiologic automated concurrent read computer-assisted detection software, on incipient enamel and dentinal caries.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>In total, 1142 proximal surfaces were assessed in 200 bitewing images by an oral radiology resident and a calibrated dental student. The presence of incipient decay was recorded and then OCA was used. Caries successfully identified by the software, incorrectly identified, and missed lesions were recorded. The same process was then performed on 535 proximal surfaces in 50 bitewing images, and the presence of dentinal decay was recorded and the same recording process above was repeated. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The data revealed a sensitivity of nearly 70% for incipient caries and a specificity of approximately 98%. The sensitivity of dentin caries was found to be nearly 94%, with a specificity of 97%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In general, human sensitivity of detection of proximal carious lesions ranges from 24% to 43% and specificity is 89% to 97%. Our results indicate that OCA is overall accurate, with greater sensitivity and specificity on proximal carious lesions and markedly high sensitivity for dentinal lesions. Artificial intelligence models have the ability to provide a reliable tool in assisting in the diagnosis of caries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 3","pages":"Pages e75-e76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in interproximal decay detection\",\"authors\":\"Dr. Jennie Caldwell ,&nbsp;Mr. Brandon Crowther ,&nbsp;Dr. Anita Gohel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Untreated caries are a prevalent health condition worldwide. Management of caries includes preventive and restoring teeth and function when necessary. In recent years, significant progress has been made with the introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms in dentistry, which includes diagnosis of incipient and advanced carious lesions. The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Overjet Caries Assist (OCA), a radiologic automated concurrent read computer-assisted detection software, on incipient enamel and dentinal caries.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>In total, 1142 proximal surfaces were assessed in 200 bitewing images by an oral radiology resident and a calibrated dental student. The presence of incipient decay was recorded and then OCA was used. Caries successfully identified by the software, incorrectly identified, and missed lesions were recorded. The same process was then performed on 535 proximal surfaces in 50 bitewing images, and the presence of dentinal decay was recorded and the same recording process above was repeated. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The data revealed a sensitivity of nearly 70% for incipient caries and a specificity of approximately 98%. The sensitivity of dentin caries was found to be nearly 94%, with a specificity of 97%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In general, human sensitivity of detection of proximal carious lesions ranges from 24% to 43% and specificity is 89% to 97%. Our results indicate that OCA is overall accurate, with greater sensitivity and specificity on proximal carious lesions and markedly high sensitivity for dentinal lesions. Artificial intelligence models have the ability to provide a reliable tool in assisting in the diagnosis of caries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"volume\":\"139 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e75-e76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324008162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的未经治疗的龋齿是世界范围内普遍存在的健康问题。龋齿的管理包括预防和必要时恢复牙齿和功能。近年来,人工智能算法在牙科领域的应用取得了重大进展,包括早期和晚期龋齿的诊断。本研究的目的是确定Overjet龋齿辅助(OCA),一种放射学自动并发读取计算机辅助检测软件,对早期牙釉质和牙本质龋齿的敏感性和特异性。研究设计:一名口腔放射科住院医师和一名校准过的牙科学生共评估了200张咬痕图像中的1142个近端表面。记录初期衰变的存在,然后使用OCA。记录软件成功识别、错误识别和遗漏的龋齿。然后对50张咬翼图像中的535个近端表面进行相同的处理,记录是否存在牙本质蛀牙,并重复上述相同的记录过程。进行敏感性和特异性计算。结果该方法对早期龋的敏感性接近70%,特异性约为98%。牙本质龋的敏感性接近94%,特异性为97%。结论一般情况下,人类对近端龋齿病变的检测灵敏度为24% ~ 43%,特异性为89% ~ 97%。我们的结果表明,OCA总体上是准确的,对近端龋齿病变具有更高的敏感性和特异性,对牙本质病变具有明显的高敏感性。人工智能模型有能力提供一种可靠的工具来协助龋齿的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in interproximal decay detection

Objective

Untreated caries are a prevalent health condition worldwide. Management of caries includes preventive and restoring teeth and function when necessary. In recent years, significant progress has been made with the introduction of artificial intelligence algorithms in dentistry, which includes diagnosis of incipient and advanced carious lesions. The objective of this study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of Overjet Caries Assist (OCA), a radiologic automated concurrent read computer-assisted detection software, on incipient enamel and dentinal caries.

Study Design

In total, 1142 proximal surfaces were assessed in 200 bitewing images by an oral radiology resident and a calibrated dental student. The presence of incipient decay was recorded and then OCA was used. Caries successfully identified by the software, incorrectly identified, and missed lesions were recorded. The same process was then performed on 535 proximal surfaces in 50 bitewing images, and the presence of dentinal decay was recorded and the same recording process above was repeated. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were performed.

Results

The data revealed a sensitivity of nearly 70% for incipient caries and a specificity of approximately 98%. The sensitivity of dentin caries was found to be nearly 94%, with a specificity of 97%.

Conclusion

In general, human sensitivity of detection of proximal carious lesions ranges from 24% to 43% and specificity is 89% to 97%. Our results indicate that OCA is overall accurate, with greater sensitivity and specificity on proximal carious lesions and markedly high sensitivity for dentinal lesions. Artificial intelligence models have the ability to provide a reliable tool in assisting in the diagnosis of caries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a 10-year cohort study Contemporary strategies for active learning in oral and maxillofacial surgery education Effectiveness of computer-guided versus conventional arthrocentesis in the management of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review of clinical studies Evaluation of bone repair using sticky bone in preradiotherapy extraction sockets of head and neck cancer patients: a pre- and postradiotherapy follow-up Treatment planning software to protect dental structure, salivary glands, and nontarget tissue in head and neck cancer patients: a scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1